Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2016-1
Density characteristics of laser-sintered three-dimensional printing parts investigated by using an integrated finite element analysis–based evolutionary algorithm approach
An integrated finite element analysis–evolutionary algorithm simulation approach is proposed in this work to model the density characteristics of the three-dimensional printing, specifically for selective laser sintering process. The approach consists of modeling sintering phenomenon by finite element analysis simulation, which is further fed into an evolutionary algorithm cluster comprising genetic programming. The integrated approach is useful to model the functional relationship of density characteristic of selective laser sintering–fabricated components with respect to laser power, scan velocity and scan spacing. Performance of the proposed model is evaluated against the actual results obtained from the literature. We find that our proposed finite element analysis–evolutionary algorithm model is able to model the selective laser sintering process very well, which can be used to complement the analytically and experimentally obtained results. For the validation of the robustness of the model, we also conducted sensitivity and parametric analyses and investigated the specific influence, and variation, of each of the input process parameters on the density of the selective laser sintering–fabricated component. It was found that scan spacing has the least influence, whereas scan velocity has the highest influence on the density of the selective laser sintering–fabricated component. Non-linear relationships unveiled between the process parameters highlight the capability of the model in simulating the density characteristic of the complex selective laser sintering process in uncertain input conditions.
DeckardCRMcClureP. Selective laser sintering, 1988. Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin.
2.
GargATaiKSavalaniMM. State-of-the-art in empirical modelling of rapid prototyping processes. Rapid Prototyping J2014; 20: 164–178.
3.
RaghunathNPandeyPM. Improving accuracy through shrinkage modelling by using Taguchi method in selective laser sintering. Int J Mach Tool Manu2007; 47: 985–995.
4.
BugedaGCerveraMLomberaG. Numerical prediction of temperature and density distributions in selective laser sintering processes. Rapid Prototyping J1999; 5: 21–26.
5.
NelsonJCXueSBarlowJW. Model of the selective laser sintering of bisphenol-A polycarbonate. Ind Eng Chem Res1993; 32: 2305–2317.
6.
SinghAKPrakashRS. DOE based three-dimensional finite element analysis for predicting density of a laser-sintered part. Rapid Prototyping J2010; 16: 460–467.
7.
TontowiAEChildsTHC. Density prediction of crystalline polymer sintered parts at various powder bed temperatures. Rapid Prototyping J2001; 7: 180–184.
8.
ShenXYaoJWangY. Density prediction of selective laser sintering parts based on artificial neural network. In: YinF-LWangJGuoC (eds) Advances in neural networks—ISNN 2004. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2004, pp.832–840.
9.
LiX-fDongJ-hZhangY-z. Modeling and applying of RBF neural network based on fuzzy clustering and pseudo-inverse method. In: International conference on information engineering and computer science (ICIECS 2009), Wuhan, China, 19–20 December 2009, pp.1–4. New York: IEEE.
10.
Cong-ZhongCJun-FangPYu-FengW. Density prediction of selective laser sintering parts based on support vector regression. Acta Phys Sin2009; 58(6): S8–S14.
11.
ChatterjeeANKumarSSahaP. An experimental design approach to selective laser sintering of low carbon steel. J Mater Process Tech2003; 136: 151–157.
12.
LiaoHShieJ. Optimization on selective laser sintering of metallic powder via design of experiments method. Rapid Prototyping J2007; 13: 156–162.
13.
KruthJPKumarS. Statistical analysis of experimental parameters in selective laser sintering. Adv Eng Mater2005; 7: 750–755.
14.
BealVEPaggiRASalmoriaGV. Statistical evaluation of laser energy density effect on mechanical properties of polyamide parts manufactured by selective laser sintering. J Appl Polym Sci2009; 113: 2910–2919.
15.
YildizAR. A comparative study of population-based optimization algorithms for turning operations. Inform Sciences2012; 210: 81–88.
16.
YildizAR. Comparison of evolutionary-based optimization algorithms for structural design optimization. Eng Appl Artif Intel2013; 26: 327–333.
17.
YildizAR. A new hybrid differential evolution algorithm for the selection of optimal machining parameters in milling operations. Appl Soft Comput2013; 13: 1561–1566.
18.
YildizAR. A new hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm for robust optimal design and manufacturing. Appl Soft Comput2013; 13: 2906–2912.
19.
YildizAR. Optimization of cutting parameters in multi-pass turning using artificial bee colony-based approach. Inform Sciences2013; 220: 399–407.
20.
YildizAR. Hybrid Taguchi-differential evolution algorithm for optimization of multi-pass turning operations. Appl Soft Comput2013; 13: 1433–1439.
21.
YildizAR. Cuckoo search algorithm for the selection of optimal machining parameters in milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2013; 64: 55–61.
22.
YildizAR. A novel hybrid immune algorithm for global optimization in design and manufacturing. Robot Cim Int Manuf2009; 25: 261–270.
23.
YildizAR. An effective hybrid immune-hill climbing optimization approach for solving design and manufacturing optimization problems in industry. J Mater Process Tech2009; 209: 2773–2780.
24.
GandomiAHAlaviAH. Multi-stage genetic programming: a new strategy to nonlinear system modeling. Inform Sciences2011; 181: 5227–5239.
25.
GargAGargATaiK. An integrated SRM-multi-gene genetic programming approach for prediction of factor of safety of 3-D soil nailed slopes. Eng Appl Artif Intel2014; 30: 30–40.
26.
GargASriramSTaiK. Empirical analysis of model selection criteria for genetic programming in modeling of time series system. In: 2013 IEEE conference on computational intelligence for financial engineering & economics (CIFEr), Singapore, 16–19 April 2013, pp.90–94. New York: IEEE.
27.
GargAVijayaraghavanVWongCH. An embedded simulation approach for modeling the thermal conductivity of 2D nanoscale material. Simul Model Pract Th2014; 44: 1–13.
28.
VijayaraghavanVGargAWongCH. Measurement of properties of graphene sheets subjected to drilling operation using computer simulation. Measurement2014; 50: 50–62.
29.
VijayaraghavanVGargAWongCH. Estimation of mechanical properties of nanomaterials using artificial intelligence methods. Appl Phys A: Mater2014; 116: 1099–1107.
30.
SchererGW. Sintering of low-density glasses: I, theory. J Am Ceram Soc1977; 60: 236–239.
31.
SchererGW. Sintering of low-density glasses: III, effect of a distribution of pore sizes. J Am Ceram Soc1977; 60: 243–246.
32.
SchererGWBachmanDL. Sintering of low-density glasses: II, experimental study. J Am Ceram Soc1977; 60: 239–243.
33.
MackenzieJKShuttleworthR. A phenomenological theory of sintering. Proc Phys Soc B1949; 62: 833.
34.
ChildsTHCBerzinsMRyderGR. Selective laser sintering of an amorphous polymer—simulations and experiments. Proc IMechE, Part B: J Engineering Manufacture1999; 213: 333–349.
35.
RistićMMMilosevićSD. Frenkel’s theory of sintering. Sci Sinter2006; 16: 7–11.
KozaJR. Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.
39.
GargATaiK. Review of genetic programming in modeling of machining processes. In: 2012 proceedings of international conference on modelling, identification & control (ICMIC), Wuhan, China, 24–26 June 2012, pp.653–658. New York: IEEE.
40.
GargAGargATaiK. A multi-gene genetic programming model for estimating stress-dependent soil water retention curves. Computat Geosci2014; 18(1): 45–56.
41.
GargAGargATaiK. Estimation of factor of safety of rooted slope using an evolutionary approach. Ecol Eng2014; 64: 314–324.
42.
GargATaiK. Genetic programming for modeling vibratory finishing process: role of experimental designs and fitness functions. In: Swarm, evolutionary, and memetic computing, Chennai, India, 19–21 December 2013, pp.23–31. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
43.
GargATaiKGuptaA. A modified multi-gene genetic programming approach for modelling true stress of dynamic strain aging regime of austenitic stainless steel 304. Meccanica2014; 49(5): 1193–1209.
44.
GargATaiKSavalaniM. Formulation of bead width model of an SLM prototype using modified multi-gene genetic programming approach. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2014; 73: 375–388.
45.
GargATaiKVijayaraghavanV. Mathematical modelling of burr height of the drilling process using a statistical-based multi-gene genetic programming approach. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2014; 73: 113–126.
46.
VijayaraghavanVGargAWongCH. An integrated computational approach for determining the elastic properties of boron nitride nanotubes. Int J Mech Mater Des. Epub ahead of print 13June2014. DOI: 10.1007/s10999-014-9262-1.
47.
WilliamsJDDeckardCR. Advances in modeling the effects of selected parameters on the SLS process. Rapid Prototyping J1998; 4: 90–100.
48.
PrakashRSGhoshAJSinghAK. Numerical slicing and optimum hatching of parametric B-Rep solids in layered manufacturing. International Journal of Computer Aided Engineering and Technology2008; 1:105–124.
