Fault diagnosis of various rotating equipment plays a significant role in industries as it guarantees safety, reliability and prevents breakdown and loss of any source of energy. Early identification is a fundamental aspect for diagnosing the faults which saves both time and costs and in fact it avoids perilous conditions. Investigations are being carried out for intelligent fault diagnosis using machine learning approaches. This article analyses various machine learning approaches used for fault diagnosis of rotating equipment. In addition to this, a detailed study of different machine learning strategies which are incorporated on various rotating equipment in the context of fault diagnosis is also carried out. Mainly, the benefits and advance patterns of deep neural network which are applied to multiple components for fault diagnosis are inspected in this study. Finally, different algorithms are proposed to propagate the quality of fault diagnosis and the conceivable research ideas of applying machine learning approaches on various rotating equipment are condensed in this article.
LiuRYangBZioE, et al.
Artificial intelligence for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery: a review. Mech Syst Sign Process2018;
108: 33–47.
2.
XieYZhangT.Fault diagnosis for rotating machinery based on convolutional neural network and empirical mode decomposition. Shock Vibrat2017;
2017: 1–12.
3.
KablaAMokraniK.Bearing fault diagnosis using Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT) and support vector machine (SVM). Mech Indus2016;
17: 308.
4.
LiJWangHWangX, et al.
Rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on improved adaptive parameterless empirical wavelet transform and sparse denoising. Measurement2020;
152: 107392.
5.
YangBLiuRChenX.Fault diagnosis for a wind turbine generator bearing via sparse representation and shift-invariant K-SVD. IEEE Trans Indust Inform2017;
13: 1321–1331.
6.
LeeMH.Insights from machine learning techniques for predicting the efficiency of fullerene derivatives‐based ternary organic solar cells at ternary blend design. Adv Energ Mater2019;
9: 1900891.
7.
FengHWangYZhuJ, et al. Multi-kernel learning based autonomous fault diagnosis for centrifugal pumps. In: 2018 International conference on control, automation and information sciences (ICCAIS), 24 October 2018. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp. 548–553.
8.
JiangWLiZLiJ, et al.
Study on a fault identification method of the hydraulic pump based on a combination of voiceprint characteristics and extreme learning machine. Processes2019;
7: 894.
9.
SuXTomovicMMZhuD.Diagnosis of gradual faults in high-speed gear pairs using machine learning. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2019;
41: 195.
10.
BanerjeeSSamynathanBAbrahamJ, et al. Real-time error detection in nonlinear control systems using machine learning assisted state-space encoding. In: IEEE transactions on dependable and secure computing, 4 March 2019.
11.
WeiYLiYXuM, et al.
A review of early fault diagnosis approaches and their applications in rotating machinery. Entropy2019;
21: 409.
12.
YadavPChauhanSTiwariP, et al. Mode selection in variational mode decomposition and its application in fault diagnosis of rolling element bearing. In: Reliability, safety and hazard assessment for Risk-Based technologies. Singapore: Springer, 2020, pp. 663–670.
13.
XinYLiSWangJ, et al.
Intelligent fault diagnosis method for rotating machinery based on vibration signal analysis and hybrid multi-object deep CNN. IET Sci Measure Technol2020;
14: 407–415.
14.
ChaconJLKappatosVBalachandranW, et al.
A novel approach for incipient defect detection in rolling bearings using acoustic emission technique. Appl Acoust2015;
89: 88–100.
15.
YassaNRachekM.Modeling and detecting the stator winding inter turn fault of permanent magnet synchronous motors using stator current signature analysis. Math Comput Simul2020;
167: 325–339.
16.
SharmaAJigyasuRMathewL, et al. Bearing fault diagnosis using weighted K-nearest neighbor. In: 2018 2nd International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), 11 May 2018. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp. 1132–1137.
17.
VermaVRatolJSSinghA. Bearing fault detection using ensemble empirical mode decomposition integrated with Teager Kaiser energy method. Int J Technol Computing2019; 4: 167–171.
18.
WangHYuZGuoL.Real-time online fault diagnosis of rolling bearings based on KNN algorithm. J Phys Conf Ser2020;
1486: 032019.
19.
CasoEFernandez-del-RinconAGarciaP, et al.
Monitoring of misalignment in low speed geared shafts with acoustic emission sensors. Appl Acoust2020;
159: 107092.
20.
SanchezRVLuceroPMacancelaJC, et al. Gear crack level classification by using knn and time-domain features from acoustic emission signals under different motor speeds and loads. In: Proceedings-2018 international conference on sensing, diagnostics, prognostics, and control, SDPC 2018, 11 March 2019.
21.
WangD.K-nearest neighbors based methods for identification of different gear crack levels under different motor speeds and loads: revisited. Mech Syst Sign Process2016;
70–71: 201–208.
22.
KhazaeeMAhmadiHOmidM, et al.
Classifier fusion of vibration and acoustic signals for fault diagnosis and classification of planetary gears based on Dempster–Shafer evidence theory. Proc IMechE, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering2014;
228: 21–32.
23.
Ranganatha Chakravarthy HS, Sai Charan B, Uma Shankar S, et al. Electrical fault detection using machine learning algorithm for centrifugal water pumps. In 2019 IEEE international conference on environment and electrical engineering and 2019 IEEE industrial and commercial power systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe), Geneva, Italy. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–6.
24.
ALTobiMABevanGWallaceP, et al.
Fault diagnosis of a centrifugal pump using MLP-GABP and SVM with CWT. Eng Sci Technol Int J2019;
22: 854–861.
25.
Alamelu ManghaiTMJegadeeshwaranR.Vibration based brake health monitoring using wavelet features: a machine learning approach. J Vibrat Control2019;
25: 2534–2550.
26.
SuXTomovicMMZhuD.Diagnosis of gradual faults in high-speed gear pairs using machine learning. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2019;
41: 1–11.
27.
MiljkovićD.Brief review of motor current signature analysis. HDKBR Info Mag2015;
5: 14–26.
28.
KumarAKumarR.Time-frequency analysis and support vector machine in automatic detection of defect from vibration signal of centrifugal pump. Measurement2017;
108: 119–133.
29.
XiaoSZhangZSongM.Fault diagnosis method of gear based on lifting wavelet packet and combined optimization BP neural network. Vibroeng Proc2019;
29: 18–23.
30.
ChenZZhaoFZhouJ, et al.
Fault diagnosis of loader gearbox based on an Ica and SVM algorithm. Int J Environ Res Public Health2019;
16: 4868.
31.
YouLFanWLiZ, et al.
A fault diagnosis model for rotating machinery using VWC and MSFLA-SVM based on vibration signal analysis. Shock Vibrat2019;
2019: 1–16.
32.
YangDMiaoJZhangF, et al.
Bearing fault diagnosis using a support vector machine optimized by an improved ant lion optimizer. Shock Vibrat2019;
2019: 1–20.
33.
MonteiroRPCerradaMCabreraDR, et al.
Using a support vector machine based decision stage to improve the fault diagnosis on gearboxes. Comput Intell Neurosci2019;
2019: 1383752.
34.
IslamMMKimJM.Reliable multiple combined fault diagnosis of bearings using heterogeneous feature models and multiclass support vector machines. Reliabil Eng Syst Saf2019;
184: 55–66.
35.
HanDZhaoNShiP.Gear fault feature extraction and diagnosis method under different load excitation based on EMD, PSO-SVM and fractal box dimension. J Mech Sci Technol2019;
33: 487–494.
36.
GongWChenHZhangZ, et al.
A novel deep learning method for intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on improved CNN-SVM and multichannel data fusion. Sensors2019;
19: 1693.
37.
YanHMuHYiX, et al.
Fault diagnosis of wind turbine based on PCA and GSA-SVM. In: 2019 prognostics and system health management conference (phm-Paris), 2 May 2019. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp. 13–17.
38.
QiYShenCWangd, et al.
Stacked sparse autoencoder-based deep network for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. IEEE Access2017;
5: 15066–15079.
39.
LiJLiXHeD, et al.
A novel method for early gear pitting fault diagnosis using stacked SAE and GBRBM. Sensors2019;
19: 758.
40.
LiXLiJHeD, et al.
Gear pitting fault diagnosis using raw acoustic emission signal based on deep learning [diagnostyka pittingu kół zębatych na podstawie surowego sygnału emisji akustycznej w oparciu o głębokie uczenie maszynowe]. EiN2019;
21: 403–410.
41.
KanePVAndhareAB.End of the assembly line gearbox fault inspection using artificial neural network and support vector machines. Int J Acoust Vibrat2019;
24: 68–84.
42.
LiXLiJQuY, et al.
Gear pitting fault diagnosis using integrated CNN and GRU network with both vibration and acoustic emission signals. Appl Sci2019;
9: 768.
43.
ElyassamiYBenjellounKEr-RajouanyM.Gear fault diagnosis and classification using data vibration. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci2017;
12: 5617–5625.
44.
GaiJShenJWangH, et al.
A parameter-optimized DBN using Goa and its application in fault diagnosis of gearbox. Shock Vibrat2020;
2020: 1–11.
45.
WangSXiangJZhongY, et al.
A data indicator-based deep belief networks to detect multiple faults in axial piston pumps. Mech Syst Sig Process2018;
112: 154–170.
46.
ShaoHJiangHZhaoH, et al.
A novel deep autoencoder feature learning method for rotating machinery fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Sig Process2017;
95: 187–204.
47.
VerstraeteDFerradaADroguettEL, et al.
Deep learning enabled fault diagnosis using time-frequency image analysis of rolling element bearings. Shock Vibrat2017;
2017: 1–17.
48.
GanMWangCZhuC׳a.Construction of hierarchical diagnosis network based on deep learning and its application in the fault pattern recognition of rolling element bearings. Mech Syst Sig Process2016;
72–73: 92–104.
49.
HeMHeD.Deep learning based approach for bearing fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Industry Appl2017;
53: 3057–3065.
50.
MaoWFengWLiangX.A novel deep output kernel learning method for bearing fault structural diagnosis. Mech Syst Sig Process2019;
117: 293–318.
51.
TaoJLiuYYangD.Bearing fault diagnosis based on deep belief network and multisensor information fusion. Shock Vibrat2016;
2016: 1–9.
52.
LiCSanchezRVZuritaG, et al.
Gearbox fault diagnosis based on deep random forest fusion of acoustic and vibratory signals. Mech Syst Sig Process2016;
76–77: 283–293.
53.
YaoBZhenPWuL, et al.
Rolling element bearing fault diagnosis using improved manifold learning. IEEE Access2017;
5: 6027–6035.
54.
CaiJLiX.Gear fault diagnosis based on empirical mode decomposition and 1.5 dimension spectrum. Shock Vibrat2016;
2016: 1–10.
55.
VijayKKGovindM. Study of improper chamfering and pitting defects of spur gear faults using frequency domain technique. Int J Scientif Dev Res2016; 1: 543–549.
56.
ChenKZhouXCFangJQ, et al.
Fault feature extraction and diagnosis of gearbox based on EEMD and deep briefs network. Int J Rotat Mach2017;
2017: 1–10.
57.
SamantaB.Gear fault detection using artificial neural networks and support vector machines with genetic algorithms. Mech Syst Sig Process2004;
18: 625–644.
58.
HeidariMHomaeiHGolestanianH, et al.
Fault diagnosis of gearboxes using wavelet support vector machine, least square support vector machine and wavelet packet transform. J Vibroeng2016;
18: 860–875.
59.
MedinaRMacancelaJCLuceroP, et al.
Vibration signal analysis using symbolic dynamics for gearbox fault diagnosis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2019;
104: 2195–2214.
60.
LiuXHuangHXiangJ.A personalized diagnosis method to detect faults in gears using numerical simulation and extreme learning machine. Knowledge-Based Syst2020;
195: 105653.
61.
LoCCLeeCHHuangWC.Prognosis of bearing and gear wears using convolutional neural network with hybrid loss function. Sensors2020;
20: 3539.
62.
AbdulZKAl-TalabaniAKRamadanDO.A hybrid temporal feature for gear fault diagnosis using the long short term memory. IEEE Sensors J. 2020.
63.
SongYYYingLU.Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry2015;
27: 130–135.
64.
PrajwalaTR.A comparative study on decision tree and random forest using R tool. Int J Adv Res Comput Commun Eng2015;
4: 196–199.
65.
DietterichTG.Ensemble methods in machine learning. In: International workshop on multiple classifier systems.
Berlin, Heidelberg:
Springer, 2000, pp. 1–15.
66.
RenYZhangLSuganthanPN.Ensemble classification and regression-recent developments, applications and future directions. IEEE Comput Intellig Magaz2016;
11: 41–53.
67.
ZhouFHuPYangS, et al.
A multimodal feature fusion-based deep learning method for online fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Sensors2018;
18: 3521.
68.
JaberAAAliKM.Artificial neural network based fault diagnosis of a Pulley-Belt rotating system. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inform Technol2019;
9: 544–551.
69.
ZhouQYanPLiuH, et al.
Research on a configurable method for fault diagnosis knowledge of machine tools and its application. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2018;
95: 937–960.
70.
PandarakoneSEMasukoMMizunoY, et al.
Deep neural network based bearing fault diagnosis of induction motor using fast Fourier transform analysis. In: 2018 IEEE energy conversion congress and exposition (ECCE). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp. 3214–3221.
71.
LiHZhaoJNiX, et al.
Fault diagnosis for machinery based on feature extraction and general regression neural network. Int J Syst Assurance Eng Manage2018;
9: 1034–1046.
72.
XuGLiuMJiangZ, et al.
Bearing fault diagnosis method based on deep convolutional neural network and random forest ensemble learning. Sensors2019;
19: 1088.
73.
XueXLiCCaoS, et al.
Fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings with a two-step scheme based on permutation entropy and random forests. Entropy2019;
21: 96.
74.
ZhaoBYuanQZhangH.An improved scheme for Vibration-Based rolling bearing fault diagnosis using feature integration and AdaBoost tree-based ensemble classifier. Appl Sci2020;
10: 1802.
75.
WangZWangJCaiW, et al.
Application of an improved ensemble local mean decomposition method for gearbox composite fault diagnosis. Complexity2019;
2019: 1–17.
76.
GuoJWuJZhangS, et al.
Generative transfer learning for intelligent fault diagnosis of the wind turbine gearbox. Sensors2020;
20: 1361.
77.
JiaFLeiYLinJ, et al.
Deep neural networks: a promising tool for fault characteristic mining and intelligent diagnosis of rotating machinery with massive data. Mech Syst Sig Process2016;
72-73: 303–315.
78.
ShaoSMcAleerSYanR, et al.
Highly accurate machine fault diagnosis using deep transfer learning. IEEE Trans Indust Inform2019;
15: 2446–2455.
79.
QianWLiSWangJ, et al. A new deep transfer learning network for fault diagnosis of rotating machine under variable working conditions. In: 2018 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Chongqing). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp. 1010–1016.
80.
AfrasiabiSAfrasiabiMParangB, et al.
Real-time bearing fault diagnosis of induction motors with accelerated deep learning approach. In: 2019 10th international power electronics, drive systems and technologies conference (PEDSTC). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE (pp. 155–159).
81.
MaSChuFHanQ.Deep residual learning with demodulated time-frequency features for fault diagnosis of planetary gearbox under nonstationary running conditions. Mech Syst Sig Process2019;
127: 190–201.
82.
HanJHChoiDJHongSK, et al. Motor fault diagnosis using CNN based deep learning algorithm considering motor rotating speed. In: 2019 IEEE 6th international conference on industrial engineering and applications (ICIEA). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2019, pp. 440–445.
83.
XueyiLIJialinLIYongzhiQU, et al.
Semi-supervised gear fault diagnosis using raw vibration signal based on deep learning. Chin J Aeronaut2020;
33: 418–426.
84.
LuCWangZZhouB.Intelligent fault diagnosis of rolling bearing using hierarchical convolutional network based health state classification. Adv Eng Informat2017;
32: 139–151.
85.
GuoXChenLShenC.Hierarchical adaptive deep convolution neural network and its application to bearing fault diagnosis. Measurement2016;
93: 490–502.
86.
WenLLiXGaoL, et al.
A new convolutional neural network-based data-driven fault diagnosis method. IEEE Trans Indust Electron2018;
65: 5990–5998.
87.
ShaoHJiangHWangF, et al.
Rolling bearing fault diagnosis using adaptive deep belief network with dual-tree complex wavelet packet. ISA Trans2017;
69: 187–201.
88.
HoangDTKangHJ. Deep belief network and Dempster-Shafer evidence theory for bearing fault diagnosis. In: 2018 IEEE 27th international symposium on industrial electronics (ISIE). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, pp. 841–846.
89.
LiangTWuSDuanW, et al.
Bearing fault diagnosis based on improved ensemble learning and deep belief network. J Phys Conf Ser2018;
1074: 1–7.
90.
PanHHeXTangS, et al.
An improved bearing fault diagnosis method using one-dimensional CNN and LSTM. J Mech Eng2018;
64: 443–452.
91.
ZhouQChenGJiangW, et al.
Automatically detecting excavator anomalies based on machine learning. Symmetry2019;
11: 957.
92.
ZhangWPengGLiC, et al.
A new deep learning model for fault diagnosis with good anti-noise and domain adaptation ability on raw vibration signals. Sensors2017;
17: 425.
93.
DuanYWangCChenY, et al.
Improving the accuracy of fault frequency by means of local mean decomposition and ratio correction method for rolling bearing failure. Appl Sci2019;
9: 1888.
94.
ShiJDuGDingR, et al.
Time frequency representation enhancement via frequency matching linear transform for bearing condition monitoring under variable speeds. Appl Sci2019;
9: 3828.
95.
YinJLeiMZhengH, et al.
The average coding length of huffman coding based signal processing and its application in fault severity recognition. Appl Sci2019;
9: 5051.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
