Indian process industries have come a long way to modify their technological aspects. Although consumption of processed beverages and food is booming around the globe, Indian process industries such as sugar mills are still struggling to make the best out of their resources. So, it is needful to implement a valuable strategy such as overall equipment effectiveness, which is a product of performance, quality and availability. This execution will enhance performance as well as production by mitigating the faults in the processes, operations and activities.
This study presents overall equipment effectiveness as a metric approach for measuring performance. Since limited literature is available regarding overall equipment effectiveness implementation in the processing units in India; there is great scope of this study and its benefits. This study will enhance the knowledge of the stakeholders as well as researchers and will encourage overall equipment effectiveness implementation in this sector.
SolomonS. The Indian sugar industry: an overview. Sugar Tech2011; 13: 255–265.
2.
SuzukiT. Overview of TPM in process industries. In TPM In process industries.United Kingdom: Routledge, 2017, pp. 19–38.
3.
KanoH. The sugar plantation in India and Indonesia: industrial production, 1770–2010. In: UlbeBosma (ed). Studies in comparative world history, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. pp. xii + 323. ISBN 10: 110703969X; ISBN 13: 978–1107039698. International Journal of Asian Studies. 2015 Jan;12:115–7.
4.
GangwarLSSolomonSAnwarSI. Technological and policy options for modernization of jaggery industry in India. Energy (kcal)2015; 383: 398.
5.
StamatisDH. The OEE primer: understanding overall equipment effectiveness, reliability, and maintainability. Boca Raton, Florida, United States: CRC Press, 2017.
NakajimaS (ed). TPM Development program: implementing total productive maintenance. New York, NY, United States: Productivity Press, 1989.
8.
DalBTugwellPGreatbanksR. Overall equipment effectiveness as a measure of operational improvement–a practical analysis. Int J Oper Prod Manage2000; 20: 1488–1502.
9.
SinghSSinghKMahajanV,et al.Justification of overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) in Indian sugar mill industry for attaining core excellence. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovation2020; 8: 34–36.
10.
ScottDPisaR. Can overall factory effectiveness prolong Mooer's law?Solid State Technol1998; 41: 75–81.
11.
OechsnerRPfefferMPfitznerL,et al.From overall equipment efficiency (OEE) to overall Fab effectiveness (OFE). Mater Sci Semicond. Process2002; 5: 333–339.
12.
ForeSZuzeL. Improvement of overall equipment effectiveness through total productive maintenance. World Acad Sci Eng Technol2010; 61: 2010.
13.
SinghSKhambaJSSinghD. Analysis and directions of OEE and its integration with different strategic tools. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering2021; 235: 594–605.
14.
IvancicFMalaviyaAPetersL. An automatic rule base generation method for fuzzy pattern recognition with multiphased clustering. In 1998 Second International Conference. Knowledge-Based Intelligent Electronic Systems. Proceedings KES’98 (Cat. No. 98EX111).IEEE1998 Apr 21; Vol. 3, pp. 66–75.
15.
MuthiahKMHuangSH. Overall throughput effectiveness (OTE) metric for factory-level performance monitoring and bottleneck detection. Int J Prod Res2007; 45: 4753–4769.
16.
MathurADangayachGSMittalML,et al.Performance measurement in automated manufacturing. Measuring Business Excellence2011; 15: 77–91.
17.
MackCA. Fifty years of Moore's law. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf2011; 24: 202–207.
18.
Garza-ReyesJAEldridgeSBarberKD, et al.Overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) and process capability (PC) measures. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management2010; 27: 48–62.
19.
BaluchNHAbdullahCSMohtarS. Measuring OEE in Malaysian palm oil mills. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business2012; 4: 733–743.
20.
HuangSHDismukesJPShiJ,et al.Manufacturing productivity improvement using effectiveness metrics and simulation analysis. Int J Prod Res2003; 41: 513–527.
21.
BamberCJCastkaPSharpJM,et al.Cross-functional team working for overall equipment effectiveness (OEE). J Qual Maint Eng. 2003; 9: 223–238.
22.
JonssonPLesshammarM. Evaluation and improvement of manufacturing performance measurement systems-the role of OEE. Int J Oper Prod Manage1999; 19: 55–78.
23.
WilliamsonDLynch-WoodGRamsayJ. Drivers of environmental behaviour in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. J Bus Ethics2006; 67: 317–330.
24.
NeelyA. The performance measurement revolution: why now and what next?Int J Oper Prod Manage1999; 19: 205–228.
25.
AmaratungaDBaldryD. A conceptual framework to measure facilities management performance. Property Management2003; 21: 171–189.
26.
SinghKSinghS. Eliminating obstacles in TPM implementation in sugarmill industry. International Journal2018; 6: 332–334.
27.
KobbacyKAMurthyDP (eds). Complex system maintenance handbook. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media, 2008; Vol. 1, pp. 3–18.
28.
AnderssonCBellgranM. Combining Overall equipment Efficiency (OEE) and productivity measures as drivers for production improvements. In Proceedings of the 4th Swedish Production Symposium (SPS11), 2011 May 3, pp. 3–5.
29.
TaylorBWDavisKR. Corporate productivity-getting it all together. Ind Eng1977; 9: 32–36.
BragliaMFrosoliniMZammoriF. Overall equipment effectiveness of a manufacturing line (OEEML). J Manuf Technol Manag2009; 20: 8–29.
32.
SinghSKhambaJSSinghD. Interpretive structural modeling to evaluate the key barriers inhibiting successful implementation of overall equipment effectiveness. Int J Prod Qual Manage (Accepted: 2020 July 26). DOI: 10.1504/IJPQM.2020.10034306.
33.
ParidaAKumarU. Maintenance performance measurement (MPM): issues and challenges. J Qual Maint Eng2006; 12: 239–251.
34.
AhujaIPKhambaJS. An assessment of maintenance management initiatives in the Indian manufacturing industry. Int J Technol Policy Manage2008; 8: 250–278.
35.
CainelliGMazzantiMZoboliR. Environmentally oriented innovative strategies and firm performance in services. Micro-evidence from Italy. International Review of Applied Economics2011; 25: 61–85.
36.
De ToniANassimbeniG. Strategic and operational choices for small subcontracting firms. Int J Oper Prod Manage1996; 16: 41–55.
37.
Garza-ReyesJA. From measuring overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) to overall resource effectiveness (ORE). J Qual Maint Eng2015; 21: 506–527.
38.
BagozziRPGopinathMNyerPU. The role of emotions in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science1999; 27: 184–206.
39.
GautamA. A study on performance appraisal system practiced in sugar mills, and its impact on employees’ motivation. A case study of Simbhawli Sugar Limited, India”. Asian Journal of Management Research, Reasearch Article2014.
40.
Ghafoorpoor YazdiPAziziAHashemipourM. An empirical investigation of the relationship between overall equipment efficiency (OEE) and manufacturing sustainability in industry 4.0 with time study approach. Sustainability2018; 10: 303.
41.
GibbonsPM. Improving overall equipment efficiency using a lean Six Sigma approach. Int J Six Sigma Competit Adv2006; 2: 207–232.
42.
HansenRC. Overall equipment effectiveness: a powerful production/maintenance tool for increased profits. South Norwalk, Connecticut (since 2013), New York City (1883): Industrial Press Inc, 2001.
43.
HylandPBeckettR. Engendering an innovative culture and maintaining operational balance. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development2005.
44.
IranzadehS. Investigating the relationship between RPN parameters in fuzzy PFMEA and OEE in a sugar factory. J Loss Prev Process Ind2019; 60: 221–232.
45.
KatakiRHiloidhariMBaruahD,et al.Cogeneration of heat and electricity from biomass in India: current status and future challenges. In: Sustainable Biofuels Development in India 2017, pp.135–164. Cham: Springer.
46.
KeoghWStewartV. Identifying the skill requirements of the workforce in SMEs: findings from a european social fund project. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development2001.
47.
KerrMPKnottDSMossMA,et al.Assessing the value of human factors initiatives. Appl Ergon2008; 39: 305–315.
48.
DomingoRAguadoS. Overall environmental equipment effectiveness as a metric of a lean and green manufacturing system. Sustainability2015; 7: 9031–9047.
49.
McKoneKESchroederRGCuaKO. The impact of total productive maintenance practices on manufacturing performance. J Oper Manage2001; 19: 39–58.
50.
MuchiriPPintelonL. Performance measurement using overall equipment effectiveness (OEE): literature review and practical application discussion. Int J Prod Res2008; 46: 3517–3535.
51.
SinghSKhambaJSSinghD. Analyzing the Role of Six Big Losses in OEE to Enhance the Performance: Literature Review and Directions. Advances in Industrial and Production Engineering: Select Proceedings of FLAME 20202021 Mar 21; p. 411.
