The core objective of the presented analysis is to explore the mixed convection and magnetohydrodynamics effects on tangent hyperbolic nanofluid flow generated by elongating surface. Mechanisms of thermal radiation and chemical reaction are incorporated in energy and concentration equations respectively. Moreover, the Soret-Dufour phenomenon is also taken into consideration. Mathematical formulation is floated under the assumption of boundary layer theory. Formulated partial differential (PD) system reduces into nonlinear ordinary differential (OD) system with the help of suitable transformations which has been solved with a technique named finite element method (FEM) and outcomes are justified through grid-free and convergence phenomenon. The characteristics of numerous effective parameters are displayed graphically and discussed. Furthermore, the physical quantities like local Nusselt number, Sherwood number and skin friction coefficient are tabulated numerically and analyzed. Solute concentration profile shown reverse trend for distinct values of and diminishes whereas boosted the .
NadeemSSadafHAkbarNS. Effects of nanoparticles on the peristaltic motion of tangent hyperbolic fluid model in an annulus. Alexandria Eng J2015; 54: 843–851.
2.
MahantheshBKumarPBSGireeshaBJ, et al. Nonlinear convective and radiated flow of tangent hyperbolic liquid due to stretched surface with convective condition. Results Phy2017; 7: 2404–2410.
3.
HayatTKhanMIWaqasM, et al. Stagnation point flow of hyperbolic tangent fluid with soret-dufour effects. Results Phy2017; 7: 2711–2717.
4.
RehmanKUMalikAAMalikMY, et al. Mutual effects of thermal radiations and thermal stratification on tangent hyperbolic fluid flow yields by both cylindrical and flat surfaces. Case Stud Thermal Eng2017; 10: 244–254.
5.
KhanMHussainAMalikMY, et al. Boundary layer flow of MHD tangent hyperbolic nanofluid over a stretching sheet: A numerical investigation. Results Phy2017; 7: 2837–2844.
6.
UllahZZamanG. Lie group analysis of magnetohydrodynamic tangent hyperbolic fluid flow towards a stretching sheet with slip conditions. Heliyon2017; 3: e00443.
7.
KumarKGGireeshaBJKrishanamurthyMR, et al. An unsteady squeezed flow of a tangent hyperbolic fluid over a sensor surface in the presence of variable thermal conductivity. Results Phy2017; 7: 3031–3036.
8.
IbrahimW. Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) flow of a tangent hyperbolic fluid with nanoparticles past a stretching sheet with second order slip and convective boundary condition. Results Phy2017; 7: 3723–3731.
9.
Al-KhaledKKhanSUKhanI. Chemically reactive bioconvection flow of tangent hyperbolic nanoliquid with gyrotactic microorganisms and nonlinear thermal radiation. Heliyon2020; 6: e03117.
10.
NawazMAlsaediAHayatT, et al. Dufour and soret effects in an axisymmetric stagnation point flow of second grade fluid with newtonian heating. J Mech2013; 29: 27–34.
11.
Al-MudhafAFRashadAMAhmedSE, et al. Soret and dufour effects on unsteady double diffusive natural convection in porous trapezoidal enclosures. Int J Mech Sci2018; 140: 172–178.
12.
LiuQFengXBXuXT, et al. Multiple-relaxation-time lattice boltzmann model for double-diffusive convection with dufour and soret effects. Int J Heat Mass Transf2019; 139: 713–719.
13.
XuHLuoZLouQ, et al. Lattice boltzmann simulations of the double-diffusive natural convection and oscillation characteristics in an enclosure with soret and dufour effects. Int J Thermal Sci2019; 136: 159–171.
14.
SardarHAhmadLKhanM, et al. Investigation of mixed convection flow of carreau nanofluid over a wedge in the presence of soret and dufour effects. Int J Heat Mass Transf2019; 137: 809–822.
15.
ShojaeiAAmiriAJArdahaieSSHosseinzadehKhGanjiDD, et al. Hydrothermal analysis of non-newtonian second grade fluid flow on radiative stretching cylinder with soret and dufour effects. Case Stud Thermal Eng2019; 13: 100384.
16.
KhanMIHayatTAfzalS, et al. Theoretical and numerical investigation of carreau–yasuda fluid flow subject to soret and dufour effects. Comput Methods Programs Biomed2020; 186: 105145.
17.
BekezhanovaVBGoncharovaON. Influence of the dufour and soret effects on the characteristics of evaporating liquid flows. Int J Heat Mass Transf2020; 154: 119696.
18.
HayatTSajjadRMuhammadT, et al. On MHD nonlinear stretching flow of powell–eyring nanomaterial. Results Phys2017; 7: 535–543.
19.
ZeeshanAEllahiRNawazM. Shape effect of nano size particles in unsteady mixed convection flow of nano fluid over disk with entropy generation. J Process Mech Eng2017; 4: 871–879.
20.
HayatTSajjadRAlsaediA, et al. On squeezed flow of couple stress nanofluid between two parallel plates. Results Phys2017; 7: 553–561.
21.
NawazMRanaSQureshiIH, et al. Three-dimensional heat transfer in the mixture of nanoparticles and micropolar MHD plasma with Hall and ion slip effects. AIP Adv2018; 8: 105109.
22.
RanaSNawazM. Investigation of enhancement of heat transfer in sutterby nanofluid using koo-kleinstreuer and li (KKL) correlations and cattaneo-christov heat flux model. Phys Scripta2019; 94: 115213.
23.
SaifRSHayatTEllahiR, et al. Darcy–forchheimer flow of nanofluid due to a curved stretching surface. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow2019; 29: 2–20.
24.
QureshiIHNawazMShahzadA. Numerical study of dispersion of nanoparticles in magnetohydrodynamic liquid with Hall and ion slip currents. AIP Adv2019; 9: 025219.
25.
MaskeenMMZeeshanAMehmoodOU, et al. Heat transfer enhancement in hydromagnetic alumina–copper/water hybrid nanofluid flow over a stretching cylinder. J Therm Analy Calori2019; 138: 1127–1136.
26.
KaneezHAlebraheemJElmoasryA, et al. Numerical investigation on transport of momenta and energy in micropolar fluid suspended with dusty, mono and hybrid nano-structures. AIP Adv2020; 10: 045120.
27.
AlolaiyanHRiazARazaqA, et al. Effects of double diffusion convection on third grade nanofluid through a curved compliant peristaltic channel. Coatings2020; 10: 154.
28.
SaifRSMuhammadTSadiaH, et al. Hydromagnetic flow of jeffrey nanofluid due to a curved stretching surface. Physica A2020; 551: 124060.
29.
KumarBSethGSNandkeolyarR. Successive linearisation approach to analyse thermally radiative stagnation point micropolar nanofluid flow with regression model. Pramana2019; 93; 12. DOI: 10.1007/s12043-019-1834-z
30.
PeiraviMMAlinejadJGanjiDD, et al. 3D optimization of baffle arrangement in a multi-phase nanofluid natural convection based on numerical simulation. Int J Numerical Methods Heat Fluid Flow2020; 30: 2583–2605.
31.
PeiraviMMAlinejadJGanjiDD, et al. Numerical study of fins arrangement and nanofluids effects on three-dimensional natural convection in the cubical enclosure. Transp Phenom Nano Micro Scales2019; 7: 97–112.
32.
KumarBSethGSNandkeolyarR. Quadratic multiple regression model and spectral relaxation approach to analyse stagnation point nanofluid flow with second-order slip. Proc I Mech E Part E: J Process Mech Eng2020; 234: 3–14.
33.
AlinejadJPeiraviMM. Numerical analysis of secondary droplets characteristics due to drop impacting on 3D cylinders considering dynamic contact angle. Meccanica2020; 55: 1975–2002.
34.
SinhaVKKumarBSethGS, et al. Outlining the impact of thermal radiation on micropolar nanofluid viscous dissipative flow: A spectral method based numerical simulation with regression analysis. AIP Conference Proc2020; 2253: 020024.
35.
PeiraviMMAlinejadJ. Nano particles distribution characteristics in multi-phase heat transfer between 3D cubical enclosures mounted obstacles. Alexandria Eng J2021; 60: 5025–5038.
36.
RaoSS. The finite element method in engineering. 4th edElesivers Butterworth-Heinemann, (Coral Gables, FL, USA), 2005; ISBN: 9780080470504: 688.
37.
NawazMZubairT. Finite element study of three dimensional radiative nano-plasma flow subject to Hall and ion slip currents. Results Phys2017; 7: 4111–4122.
38.
QureshiIHNawazMRanaS, et al. Investigation of variable thermo-physical properties of viscoelastic rheology: A galerkin finite element approach. AIP Advances2018; 8: 075027.
39.
SheikholeslamiMZeeshanAMajeedA. Control volume based finite element simulation of magnetic nanofluid flow and heat transport in non-darcy medium. J Mol Liq2018; 268: 354–364.
40.
NawazMRanaSQureshiIH. Computational fluid dynamic simulations for dispersion of nanoparticles in a magnetohydrodynamic liquid: A galerkin finite element method. RSC Adv2018; 8: 38324–38335.
41.
QureshiIHNawazMRanaS, et al. Galerkin finite element study on the effects of variable thermal conductivity and variable mass diffusion conductance on heat and mass transfer. Commun Theoretical Phys2018; 70: 049.
42.
LiangYJMcQuienJSIarveEV. Implementation of the regularized extended finite element method in abaqus framework for fracture modeling in laminated composites. Eng Fract Mech2020; 230: 106989.
43.
HatamiTJohnerJCFKurdianAR, et al. A step-by-step finite element method for solving the external mass transfer control model of the supercritical fluid extraction process: A case study of extraction from fennel. The J Supercritical Fluids2020; 160: 104797.
44.
LongfeiL. A split-step finite-element method for incompressible navier-stokes equations with high-order accuracy up-to the boundary. J Computat Phys2020; 408: 109274.
45.
NawazMAwaisM. Triple diffusion of species in fluid regime using tangent hyperbolic rheology. J Thermal Analysis and Cal2020; 146: 775–785.
46.
KhanMHussainAMalikMY, et al. Boundary layer flow of MHD tangent hyperbolic nanofluid over a stretching sheet: A numerical investigation. Results Phys2017; 7: 2837–2844.
