This experimental study examines how cutting parameters influence surface roughness (Ra), kerf width (KW), heat-affected zone (HAZ), and material removal rate (MRR) during CO2 laser cutting of polyethylene (PE) material. The aim is to determine the optimal cutting conditions by integrating fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. Control factors (i.e. focal length, power, and cutting speed) were varied in a full factorial experimental design. Criterion weights for the responses were calculated with the help of the AHP method in fuzzy environment, resulting in weights of 0.442 for Ra, 0.102 for KW, 0.287 for HAZ, and 0.169 for MRR. These weights were integrated into MCDM methods (i.e. combined compromise solution [CoCoSo], technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution [TOPSIS], and Vlsekriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje [VIKOR]) to rank the experiments and identify the optimal parameters. The optimal cutting condition was found to be a focal length of 8 mm, power of 90 W, and cutting speed of 12 mm/s. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were applied for analysis of the consistency among the hybrid approaches, with results indicating a very strong positive relationship between them. This comprehensive approach ensures precise and efficient laser cutting of PE, contributing valuable insights to the field of manufacturing and materials processing.
OzdemirOKoksalDKemikliogluU. Load-carrying capacity of hot-pressed thermoplastic composite joints. Mater Test2022; 64: 1614–1626.
2.
GovernmentRMOkekeET. Effect of particle size on the properties of avocado pear wood fiber/low-density polyethylene composite enhanced by pretreatment. Mater Test2024; 66: 22–35.
3.
AlateyahAIEl-TaybanyYEl-SanabaryS, et al.Experimental investigation and optimization of turning polymers using RSM, GA, hybrid FFD-GA, and MOGA methods. Polymers (Basel)2022; 14: 3585.
4.
GillSKGuptaMSatsangiPS. Prediction of cutting forces in machining of unidirectional glass fiber reinforced plastics composite. Front Mech Eng2013; 8: 187–200.
5.
OyewandeOEOlabiyiODAkinyemiML. Molecular dynamics simulations and ion beam treatment of polyethylene. J Phys Conf Ser2019; 1299: 012115.
6.
MasoudFSapuanSMMohd AriffinMKA, et al.Cutting processes of natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Polymers (Basel)2020; 12: 1332.
7.
DerOBertolaV. An experimental investigation of oil–water flow in a serpentine channel. Int J Multiphase Flow2020; 129: 103327.
8.
DerOEdwardsonSMarengoM, et al.Engineered composite polymer sheets with enhanced thermal conductivity. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2019; 613: 012008.
9.
MushtaqRTWangYRehmanM, et al.State-of-the-art and trends in CO2 laser cutting of polymeric materials: a review. Materials (Basel)2020; 13: 3839.
10.
LibreraERivaGSafarzadehH, et al.On the use of areal roughness parameters to assess surface quality in laser cutting of stainless steel with CO2 and fiber sources. Procedia CIRP2015; 33: 532–537.
11.
DerOAlqahtaniAAMarengoM, et al.Characterization of polypropylene pulsating heat stripes: effects of orientation, heat transfer fluid, and loop geometry. Appl Therm Eng2021; 184: 116304.
12.
PalanisamyCEzhumalaiN. Effect of CO2 laser cutting parameters on dimensional accuracy and heat affected zone study on epoxy. AIP Conf Proc2024; 3240: 020003.
13.
AyMSarsılmazF. Optimization of friction stir welding process parameters using multi-criteria decision making approach. Mater Test2023; 65: 603–615.
14.
ChenXLiTZhaiK, et al.Using orthogonal experimental method optimizing surface quality of CO2 laser cutting process for PMMA microchannels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2017; 88: 2727–2733.
15.
DerOOrduMBaşarG. Multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters for polyethylene thermoplastic material by integrating data envelopment analysis and SWARA-based CoCoSo approach. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi2024; 7: 638–661.
16.
ÖztürkİBaşkaraT. B-pillar design optimization under a crushing load. Mater Test2023; 65: 973–981.
17.
DerOOrduMBasarG. Optimization of cutting parameters in manufacturing of polymeric materials for flexible two-phase thermal management systems. Mater Test2024; 66: 1700–1719.
18.
EltawahniHAOlabiAGBenyounisKY. Effect of process parameters and optimization of CO2 laser cutting of ultra high-performance polyethylene. Mater Des2010; 31: 4029–4038.
19.
ChoudhuryIAShirleyS. Laser cutting of polymeric materials: an experimental investigation. Opt Laser Technol2010; 42: 503–508.
20.
DavimJPBarricasNConceiçãoM, et al.Some experimental studies on CO2 laser cutting quality of polymeric materials. J Mater Process Technol2008; 198: 99–104.
21.
DerOBaşarGOrduM. Statistical investigation of the effect of CO2 laser cutting parameters on kerf width and heat affected zone in thermoplastic materials. J Mater Mechatron A2023; 4: 459–474.
22.
RasoanaivoRGYazdaniMZaratéP, et al.Combined compromise for ideal solution (CoCoFISo): a multi-criteria decision-making based on the CoCoSo method algorithm. Expert Syst Appl2024; 251: 124079.
23.
AttriSDSinghSDharA, et al.Multi-attribute sustainability assessment of wastewater treatment technologies using combined fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making techniques. J Clean Prod2022; 357: 131849.
24.
ZhangNWeiG. Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem based on hesitant fuzzy set. Appl Math Modell2013; 37: 4938–4947.
25.
LiuQ. Identifying and correcting the defects of the Saaty analytic hierarchy/network process: a comparative study of the Saaty analytic hierarchy/network process and the Markov chain-based analytic network process. Oper Res Perspect2022; 9: 100244.
26.
DuránOAguiloJ. Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a fuzzy-AHP approach. Expert Syst Appl2008; 34: 1787–1794.
27.
AyağZÖzdemirRG. A fuzzy AHP approach to evaluating machine tool alternatives. J Intell Manuf2006; 17: 179–190.
28.
OrduMDerO. Polymeric materials selection for flexible pulsating heat pipe manufacturing using a comparative hybrid MCDM approach. Polymers (Basel)2023; 15: 2933.
29.
AhmedFKilicK. Does fuzzification of pairwise comparisons in analytic hierarchy process add any value?Soft Comput2024; 28: 4267–4284.
30.
EfeB. An integrated fuzzy multi criteria group decision making approach for ERP system selection. Appl Soft Comput2016; 38: 106–117.
31.
YazdaniMZaratePKazimieras ZavadskasE, et al.A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Manage Decis2019; 57: 2501–2519.
32.
EcerFPamucarD. Sustainable supplier selection: a novel integrated fuzzy best worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy CoCoSo with Bonferroni (CoCoSo’B) multi-criteria model. J Clean Prod2020; 266: 121981.
33.
PengXZhangXLuoZ. Pythagorean fuzzy MCDM method based on CoCoSo and CRITIC with score function for 5G industry evaluation. Artif Intell Rev2020; 53: 3813–3847.
34.
JahanshahlooGRLotfiFHIzadikhahM. Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data. Appl Math Comput2006; 181: 1544–1551.
35.
ZavadskasEKMardaniATurskisZ, et al.Development of TOPSIS method to solve complicated decision-making problems: an overview on developments from 2000 to 2015. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making2016; 15: 645–682.
36.
VahdaniBMousaviSMTavakkoli-MoghaddamR. Group decision making based on novel fuzzy modified TOPSIS method. Appl Math Modell2011; 35: 4257–4269.
37.
San CristóbalJR. Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the Vikor method. Renewable Energy2011; 36: 498–502.
38.
SayadiMKHeydariMShahanaghiK. Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers. Appl Math Modell2009; 33: 2257–2262.
39.
OpricovicSTzengGH. Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur J Oper Res2007; 178: 514–529.
40.
CaiazzoFCurcioFDaurelioG, et al.Laser cutting of different polymeric plastics (PE, PP and PC) by a CO2 laser beam. J Mater Process Technol2005; 159: 279–285.
41.
NinikasKKechagiasJSalonitisK. The impact of process parameters on surface roughness and dimensional accuracy during CO2 laser cutting of PMMA thin sheets. J Manuf Mater Process2021; 5: 74.
42.
BussayasripattPPoungsiriKYipyintumC, et al.Performance of additively manufactured Ti6Al4 V ELI finger joints: biomechanical testing and evaluation for arthritis management. Mater Test2024; 66: 1–8.
43.
ChenSL. The effects of high-pressure assistant-gas flow on high-power CO2 laser cutting. J Mater Process Technol1999; 88: 57–66.
44.
GhanyKANewishyM. Cutting of 1.2 mm thick austenitic stainless steel sheet using pulsed and CW Nd:YAG laser. J Mater Process Technol2005; 168: 438–447.
45.
HossainAHossainANukmanY, et al.A fuzzy logic-based prediction model for kerf width in laser beam machining. Mater Manuf Processes2016; 31: 679–684.
46.
MoradiMMehrabiOAzdastT, et al.Enhancement of low power CO2 laser cutting process for injection molded polycarbonate. Opt Laser Technol2017; 96: 208–218.
47.
HaddadiEMoradiMKarimzad GhavidelA, et al.Experimental and parametric evaluation of cut quality characteristics in CO2 laser cutting of polystyrene. Optik (Stuttg)2019; 184: 103–114.
48.
TamrinKFMoghadasiKSheikhNA. Experimental and numerical investigation on multi-pass laser cutting of natural fibre composite. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2020; 107: 1483–1504.
49.
TabarMYHashemzadehMRejaniAR. CO2 laser cutting of reinforced polyester (CGFRP and GFRP) sheets: an experimental investigation into specific point energy, cutting volume efficiency and material removal rate (MRR). J Manuf Processes2023; 97: 137–147.
50.
BakiogluGAtahanAO. AHP integrated TOPSIS and VIKOR methods with Pythagorean fuzzy sets to prioritize risks in self-driving vehicles. Appl Soft Comput2021; 99: 106948.
51.
WangQChengTLuY, et al.Underground mine safety and health: a hybrid MEREC–CoCoSo system for the selection of best sensor. Sensors2024; 24: 1285.
52.
GürgenSÇakırFHSofuoğluMA, et al.Multi-criteria decision-making analysis of different non-traditional machining operations of Ti6Al4 V. Soft Comput2019; 23: 5259–5272.
53.
KalitaKMadhuSRamachandranM, et al.Experimental investigation and parametric optimization of a milling process using multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative analysis. Int J Interact Des Manuf2023; 17: 453–467.
54.
LukicDCepRVukmanJ, et al.Multi-criteria selection of the optimal parameters for high-speed machining of aluminum alloy Al7075 thin-walled parts. Metals (Basel)2020; 10: 1570.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
