Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Superimposition of horizontal and vertical curves may hamper train ride comfort and running stability and inflate maintenance costs. However, designing a track plan without superimposed curves is difficult owing to fixed points that have to be either avoided because of geographical conditions or traversed so that existing structures are utilized. This article presents a method to optimize the alignment of horizontal curves to enhance train ride comfort and running stability when horizontal and vertical curves are superimposed in the case of railway construction/renovation. An algorithm was developed to determine the combined range of radius–transition curve lengths (R−L_t) for feasible horizontal curves that pass fixed points; it was verified through a comparison with Kufver's iterative method using Inrail software. To determine the horizontal curves for optimal ride comfort when horizontal and vertical (convex) curves are superimposed under feasible R−L_t boundary conditions, a solution algorithm was developed using the object function of ride comfort (P_CT). Finally, the simplified analysis method using P_CT was verified via vehicle/track interaction analysis.

Keywords

superimposition ride comfort optimization railway alignment transition curve

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

European Standard. Railway applications – track alignment design parameters – track gauges 1435 mm and wider. 2010, BS EN 13803-1.

Technical Standard Research Committee for Civil Engineering. 2002, 45–225. Technical standard for railway (civil engineering part).

Baluch

Optimization of transition length increase. Rail Int., 1982, 13(10), 12–19.

Baluch

Increasing the length of the transition curves by a reduction of the main curve radius. Rail Int., 1983, 14(1), 10–15.

Hashimoto

Analysis of relationship between transition curve profile and railway vehicle's vibration. Q. Rep. RTRI Rep. (Jpn), 1989, 30(4), 207–214.

Kufver

Optimization of single horizontal curves in railway alignments. 1997, (Sweden), VTI report 424A.

Kufver

Optimization of horizontal alignments for railways, 2000 (KTH, Sweden), Doctoral Thesis.

Kobayashi

Ishida

Takai

Furukawa

Kato

Suzuki

A study on transition curve length for running safety considering vehicle running characteristics. RTRI Rep. (Jpn), 2000, 14(4), 31–36.

Long

X. Y.

Wei

Q. C.

Zheng

F. Y.

Dynamic analysis of railway transition curves. Proc. IMechE, Part F: J. Rail and Rapid Transit, 2009, 224(N1), 1–14. DOI: 10.1243/095444097JRRT287.

10.

Kufver

Mathematical description of railway alignments and some preliminary comparative studies. 1997, VTI report 420A.

11.

UIC Code 513R. Guidelines for evaluating passenger comfort in relation to vibration in railway vehicles. 1994.

12.

ERRI B 153/RP 21. Application of ISO standard 2631 to railway vehicles. 1993.

13.

2009, BSI. BS EN 12299 railway applications – ride comfort for passengers – measurement and evaluation.

14.

AEA Technology plc. VAMPIRE User Manual, 2003 (United Kingdom).

15.

UIC 518 Leaflet. Testing and approval of railway vehicles from the point of view of their dynamic behavior-safety-track fatigue-ride quality, 3rd edition. 2005, 56–61.

16.

Kufver

Variables and criteria for evaluation of vehicle reactions caused by railway alignment. 1997, VTI report 43-97.