The prolonged whole-body vibration (WBV) may be one of the important factors contributing to low back pain. This study used a validated whole-body model and the WBV evaluation standard (ISO 2631-5:2018) to investigate the effects of car seat, frequency and age on the risk factors of the lumbar spine during prolonged exposure to WBV. The modal frequencies contributing more to the human resonance were first preliminarily predicted by modal analysis, and then sinusoidal excitations with frequencies of 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13 Hz were applied for transient analysis. On this basis, the adverse effects of long-term WBV on the lumbar spine were assessed based on the risk factors defined in the WBV evaluation standard (ISO 2631-5:2018). The transient analysis and risk factor calculation demonstrated that the responses exhibited a pronounced frequency dependence, with the highest response occurring at 4 Hz and 5 Hz excitation for elastic and rigid car seats, respectively. Rigid car seat increased disc von Mises stress and risk factors by 7.6% and 11%, respectively, compared with elastic one. After 5 years from the age of 25, the peak risk factors for human-body exposure to vibration were 0.73 and 0.81 for elastic and rigid car seats, respectively and continued to increase with age. From age 45 onwards, the adverse effects of vibration on the lumbar spine will reach a risk level considered dangerous after 5 years.
FerreiraMl.de LucaKHaileLM.Global, regional, and national burden of low back pain, 1990-2020, its attributable risk factors, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol2023; 5: e316–e329.
2.
BovenziMRuiFNegroC, et al. An epidemiological study of low back pain in professional drivers. J Sound Vib2006; 298: 514–539.
3.
ChenCXiaoBHeX, et al. Prevalence of low back pain in professional drivers: a meta-analysis. Public Health2024; 231: 23–30.
4.
AndrusaitisSFOliveiraRPBarros FilhoTEP. Study of the prevalence and risk factors for low back pain in truck drivers in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Clinics2006; 61: 503–510.
5.
SandoverJ.Dynamic loading as a possible source of low-back disorders. Spine1983; 8: 652–658.
6.
SeidelHBluethnerRHinzB.Effects of sinusoidal whole-body vibration on the lumbar spine: the stress-strain relationship. Int Arch Occup Environ Health1986; 57: 207–223.
7.
GriffinMJErdreichJ.Handbook of human vibration. J Acoust Soc Am1991; 90: 2213–2213.
8.
FritzM.Estimation of spine forces under whole-body vibration by means of a biomechanical model and transfer functions. Aviat Space Environ Med1997; 68: 512–519.
9.
WilderDGAleksievARMagnussonML, et al. Muscular response to sudden load. A tool to evaluate fatigue and rehabilitation. Spine1996; 21: 2628–2639.
10.
ThalheimerE.Practical approach to measurement and evaluation of exposure to whole-body vibration in the workplace. Semin Perinatol1996; 20(1): 77–89.
11.
HanssonTHKellerTSSpenglerDM. Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar spine. II. Fatigue strength during dynamic compressive loading. J Orthop Res Off Publ Orthop Res Soc2010; 5: 479–487.
12.
PopeMHHanssonTH.Vibration of the spine and low back pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res1992; 1992: 49–59.
13.
TariqNKhanZVeqarZ.Effect of whole-body vibration on balance or proprioception in nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J Chiropr Med2023; 22: 284–293.
14.
BovenziMSchustMMenzelG, et al. Relationships of low back outcomes to internal spinal load: a prospective cohort study of professional drivers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2014; 88: 487–499.
15.
RützelSHinzBWölfelHP.Modal description—a better way of characterizing human vibration behavior. J Sound Vib2006; 298: 810–823.
16.
ZhuSDongRLiuZ, et al. A finite element method study of the effect of vibration on the dynamic biomechanical response of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech2024; 111: 106164.
17.
YadavSKHuangCMoF, et al. Analysis of seat cushion comfort by employing a finite element buttock model as a supplement to pressure measurement. Int J Ind Ergon2021; 86: 103211.
18.
DongR-CHeLDuW, et al. Effect of sitting posture and seat on biodynamic responses of internal human body simulated by finite element modeling of body-seat system. J Sound Vib2019; 438: 543–554.
19.
LiuCQiuY.Mechanism associated with the effect of backrest inclination on biodynamic responses of the human body sitting on a rigid seat exposed to vertical vibration. J Sound Vib2021; 510: 116299.
20.
TowardMGRGriffinMJ. Apparent mass of the human body in the vertical direction: effect of seat backrest. J Sound Vib2009; 327: 657–669.
21.
WangWRakhejaSBoileauPÉ.Effects of sitting postures on biodynamic response of seated occupants under vertical vibration. Int J Ind Ergon2004; 34: 289–306.
22.
ZhangXZhangQLiY, et al. Effect of the thickness of polyurethane foams at the seat pan and the backrest on fore-and-aft in-line and vertical cross-axis seat transmissibility when sitting with various contact conditions of backrest during fore-and-aft vibration. Appl Ergon2021; 93: 103354.
23.
ZhangHMengLGongY, et al. The influence of backrest angles on the passenger neck comfort during sleep in the economy class air seat without head support. Int J Ind Ergon2021; 84: 103074.
24.
LiuCQiuY.Localised apparent masses over the interface between a seated human body and a soft seat during vertical whole-body vibration. J Biomech2020; 109: 109887.
25.
DongRTangSChengX, et al. Influence of foot excitation and shin posture on the vibration behavior of the entire spine inside a seated human body. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng2023; 27: 1664–1716. 2023/09/05.
26.
DongRZhuSChengX, et al. Study on the biodynamic characteristics and internal vibration behaviors of a seated human body under biomechanical characteristics. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2024; 23: 1449–1468.
27.
DongRLuZChengX, et al. Detailed development and validation of a finite element model for studying the entire spinal vibration behavior within a seated human body. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2024; 238: 9323–9337.
28.
GuoYLiuZYangX.The dynamic characteristics of sitting human body studied by finite element method. Chin J Appl Mech2022; 40: 1–8.
29.
LiuY-TDongR-CLiuZ, et al. Finite element analysis of the cervical spine: dynamic characteristics and material property sensitivity study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng2024; 28: 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2024.2304285
30.
YuSHDongRCLiuZ, et al. Impact of sacroiliac interosseous ligament tension and laxity on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element study. World Neurosurg2024; 185: e431–e441.
31.
KasraMMerrymanWDLovelessKN, et al. Frequency response of pig intervertebral disc cells subjected to dynamic hydrostatic pressure. J Orthop Res2006; 24: 1967–1973.
32.
FanRXLiuJLiYL, et al. Finite element investigation of the effects of the low-frequency vibration generated by vehicle driving on the human lumbar mechanical properties. Biomed Res Int2018; 2018: 7962414.
33.
de la Hoz-TorresMLAguilarAJRuizDP, et al. Whole body vibration exposure transmitted to drivers of heavy equipment vehicles: A comparative case according to the short- and long-term exposure assessment methodologies defined in ISO 2631-1 and ISO 2631-5. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 5206.
34.
RobbMJMansfieldNJ.Self-reported musculoskeletal problems amongst professional truck drivers. Ergonomics2007; 50: 814–827.
35.
SeidelHBlüthnerRHinzB, et al. On the health risk of the lumbar spine due to whole-body vibration—theoretical approach, experimental data and evaluation of whole-body vibration. J Sound Vib1998; 215: 723–741.
36.
De la Hoz-TorresMLAguilar-AguileraAJMartínez-AiresMD, et al. Assessment of whole-body vibration exposure using ISO2631-1:2008 and ISO2631-5:2018 standards. In: INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings. Institute of Noise Control Engineering2019, pp. 4511–4520 2019.
37.
ZhouZGriffinMJ.Response of the seated human body to whole-body vertical vibration: discomfort caused by sinusoidal vibration. Ergonomics2014; 57: 714–732.
38.
HeWCuiHYangS.Estimation of structural dynamic response induced by individual sit-to-stand loading using acceleration response spectrum approach. Mech Syst Signal Process2024; 211: 111233.
39.
WeiXŽivanovićS.Frequency response function-based explicit framework for dynamic identification in human-structure systems. J Sound Vib2018; 422: 453–470.
40.
GuldenizOYesilOBOkyarF.Yeditepe spine mesh: finite element modeling and validation of a parametric CAD model of lumbar spine. Med Eng Phys2022; 110: 103911.
41.
KimYEGoelVKWeinsteinJN, et al. Effect of disc degeneration at one level on the adjacent level in axial mode. Spine1991; 16: 331–335.
42.
MatsumotoYGriffinMJ.Non-linear characteristics in the dynamic responses of seated subjects exposed to vertical whole-body vibration. J Biomech Eng2002; 124: 527–532.
43.
WilderDGPopeMH.Epidemiological and aetiological aspects of low back pain in vibration environments - an update. Clin Biomech1996; 11: 61–73.
44.
LiJHuangY.The effects of the duration on the subjective discomfort of a rigid seat and a cushioned automobile seat. Int J Ind Ergon2020; 79: 103007.
45.
EbeK.Predicting the overall discomfort of seats from their static and dynamic characteristics. University of Southampton, 1998.
46.
EbeKGriffinMJ.Qualitative models of seat discomfort including static and dynamic factors. Ergonomics2000; 43: 771–790.
47.
EbeKGriffinMJ.Quantitative prediction of overall seat discomfort. Ergonomics2010; 43: 791–806.
48.
TufanoSGriffinMJ.Nonlinearity in the vertical transmissibility of seating: the role of the human body apparent mass and seat dynamic stiffness. Veh Syst Dyn2013; 51: 122–138.
49.
DongRCTangSJChengX, et al. Influence of foot excitation and shin posture on the vibration behavior of the entire spine inside a seated human body. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin2024; 27: 1664–1679.
50.
Somovilla-GómezFLostado-LorzaRCorral-BobadillaM, et al. Improvement in determining the risk of damage to the human lumbar functional spinal unit considering age, height, weight and sex using a combination of FEM and RSM. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2020; 19: 351–387.
51.
TowardMGRGriffinMJ. Apparent mass of the human body in the vertical direction: inter-subject variability. J Sound Vib2011; 330: 827–841.
52.
DongRGWelcomeDEMcDowellTW, et al. Theoretical foundation, methods, and criteria for calibrating human vibration models using frequency response functions. J Sound Vib2015; 356: 195–216.
53.
ZanolaRLDoninCBBertoliniGRF, et al. Biomechanical repercussion of sitting posture on lumbar intervertebral discs: a systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther2024; 38: 384–390.
