Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Despite wide acceptance of the stereotype that women apologize more readily than men, there is little systematic evidence to support this stereotype or its supposed bases (e.g., men’s fragile egos). We designed two studies to examine whether gender differences in apology behavior exist and, if so, why. In Study 1, participants reported in daily diaries all offenses they committed or experienced and whether an apology had been offered. Women reported offering more apologies than men, but they also reported committing more offenses. There was no gender difference in the proportion of offenses that prompted apologies. This finding suggests that men apologize less frequently than women because they have a higher threshold for what constitutes offensive behavior. In Study 2, we tested this threshold hypothesis by asking participants to evaluate both imaginary and recalled offenses. As predicted, men rated the offenses as less severe than women did. These different ratings of severity predicted both judgments of whether an apology was deserved and actual apology behavior.

Keywords

apology gender differences interpersonal relationships interpersonal communication

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barrett

L.F.

Robin

Pietromonaco

P.R.

Eyssell

K.M.

(1998). Are women the “more emotional” sex? Evidence from emotional experiences in social context. Cognition & Emotion, 12, 555–578.

Bavelas

J.B.

(2004). An analysis of formal apologies by Canadian churches to First Nations (Occasional Paper No. 1). (Available from the Centre for Studies in Religion and Society, University of Victoria, Box 1700 Stn CSC, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 2Y2)

Belushi

(2006). Real men don’t apologize. New York, NY: Hyperion.

Bybee

(1998). The emergence of gender differences in guilt during adolescence. In Bybee

(Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 113–125). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Cribb

(2010). When ‘sorry’ is harder than the hardest word. Retrieved March 18, 2010, from http://www.thestar.com/living/article/780853--when-sorry-is-harder-than-the-hardest-word

Darby

B.W.

Schlenker

B.R.

(1982). Children’s reactions to apologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 742–753.

Eisenberg

Lennon

(1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100–131.

Engel

(2001). The power of apology. New York, NY: Wiley.

Gilligan

(1994). In a different voice: Women’s conceptions of self and of morality. New York, NY: Garland.

10.

Hayes

A.F.

(2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420.

11.

Holmes

(1989). Sex differences and apologies: One aspect of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics, 10, 194–213.

12.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237–251.

13.

Keltner

Young

R.C.

Heerey

E.A.

Oemig

Monarch

N.D.

(1998). Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1231–1247.

14.

Lazare

(2004). On apology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

15.

Lutwak

Ferrari

J.R.

(1996). Moral affect and cognitive processes: Differentiating shame from guilt among men and women. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 891–896.

16.

MacDonald

Leary

M.R.

(2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 202–223.

17.

MacKinnon

D.P.

Lockwood

C.M.

Hoffman

J.M.

West

S.G.

Sheets

(2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.

18.

McCullough

M.E.

Worthington

E.L.

Rachal

K.C.

(1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336.

19.

Miller

A.J.

Worthington

E.L.

McDaniel

M.A.

(2008). Gender and forgiveness: A meta-analytic review and research agenda. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 27, 843–876.

20.

Miller

J.B.

(1984). The development of women’s sense of self (Working Paper No. 12). Wellesley, MA: Stone Center for Developmental Services and Studies.

21.

Ohbuchi

Kameda

Agarie

(1989). Apology as aggression control: Its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 219–227.

22.

Preacher

K.J.

Hayes

A.F.

(2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.

23.

Ross

(1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173–220). New York, NY: Academic Press.

24.

Scher

S.J.

Darley

J.M.

(1997). How effective are the things people say to apologize? Effects of the realization of the apology speech act. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 127–140.

25.

Schmitt

Gollwitzer

Forster

Montada

(2004). Effects of objective and subjective account components on forgiving. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 465–485.

26.

Schumann

Ross

(2010). The antecedents, nature and effectiveness of political apologies for historical injustices. In Bobocel

D.R.

Kay

A.C.

Zanna

M.P.

Olson

J.M.

(Eds.), The Ontario Symposium: Vol. 11. The psychology of justice and legitimacy (pp. 299–324). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

27.

Shrout

P.E.

Bolger

. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.

28.

Tamres

L.K.

Janicki

Helgeson

V.S.

(2002). Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 2–30.

29.

Tannen

(1996). I’m sorry, I won’t apologize. Retrieved January 13, 2010, from https://www9.georgetown.edu/faculty/tannend/nyt072196.htm

30.

Tannen

(1999, April/May). Contrite makes right. Civilization, 6, 67–70.

31.

Tannen

(2001). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York, NY: William Morrow.

32.

Unruh

A.M.

(1996). Gender differences in clinical pain experience. Pain, 65, 123–167.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB