Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Researchers have debated the benefits of having accurate knowledge about a close other’s personality. However, the existing research has examined personality knowledge solely in terms of traits. Although trait knowledge may be useful during relationship selection, we hypothesize that once a relationship becomes established, accurate personality knowledge about the other person’s if-then profiles—the person’s characteristic patterns of responses to situations—may be particularly beneficial. We conducted the first study of if-then accuracy in close relationships. To do so, we developed the If-Then Trigger Profile Questionnaire, which consists of 72 descriptions of potentially bothersome interpersonal behaviors. Participants in this study selected a friend to participate with them. Both friends then rated how much each behavior tended to trigger a negative emotional reaction in themselves personally and how much each behavior might trigger a negative emotional reaction in their friend. Findings demonstrated that accurate knowledge about a friend’s if-then trigger profile is associated with reduced feelings of conflict and increased feelings of depth in the relationship.

Keywords

interpersonal relationships social perception relationship quality friendship social cognition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken

L.S.

West

S.G.

(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Back

M.D.

Schmukle

S.C.

Egloff

(2008). How extraverted is honey.bunny77@hotmail.de? Inferring personality traits from e-mail addresses. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1116–1122.

Bernieri

Zuckerman

Koestner

Rosenthal

(1994). Measuring person perception accuracy: Another look at self-other agreement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 367–378.

Biesanz

J.C.

West

S.G.

(2000). Personality coherence: Moderating self-other profile agreement and profile consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 425–437.

Buss

D.M.

Craik

K.H.

(1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90, 105–126.

Conley

T.D.

Roesch

S.C.

Peplau

L.A.

Gold

M.S.

(2009). A test of positive illusions versus shared reality models of relationship satisfaction among gay, lesbian, and heterosexual couples. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 1417–1431.

Fleeson

Gallagher

(2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097–1114.

Fleeson

Noftle

E.E.

(2008). Where does personality have its influence? A supermatrix of consistency concepts. Journal of Personality, 76, 1355–1385.

Fournier

M.A.

Moskowitz

D.S.

Zuroff

D.C.

(2008). Integrating dispositions, signatures, and the interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 531–545.

10.

Funder

D.C.

Kolar

D.W.

Blackman

M.C.

(1995). Agreement among judges of personality: Interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 656–672.

11.

Furr

R.M.

(2009). Profile analysis in person-situation integration. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 196–207.

12.

Gosling

S.D.

S.J.

Mannarelli

Morris

M.E.

(2002). A room with a cue: Judgments of personality based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 379–398.

13.

Gosling

S.D.

Rentfrow

P.J.

Swann

W.B.

Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.

14.

Ickes

(2003). Everyday mind reading: Understanding what other people think and feel. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

15.

Ickes

(2009). Strangers in a strange lab: How personality shapes our initial encounters with others. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

16.

Idson

Mischel

(2001). The personality of familiar and significant people: The lay perceiver as social-cognitive theorist. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 585–596.

17.

Kammrath

L.K.

Mendoza-Denton

Mischel

(2005). Incorporating if . . . then . . . signatures in person perception: Beyond the person-situation dichotomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 605–618.

18.

Kenny

D.A.

Kashy

D.A.

Cook

W.L.

(2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

19.

Kowalski

R.M.

(Ed.). (2001). Behaving badly: Aversive behaviors in interpersonal relationships. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

20.

Mischel

(2009). From personality and assessment (1968) to personality science. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 282–290.

21.

Mischel

Shoda

(1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.

22.

Murray

S.L.

Holmes

J.G.

Bellavia

Griffin

D.W.

Dolderman

(2002). Kindred spirits? The benefits of egocentrism in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 563–581.

23.

Murray

S.L.

Holmes

J.G.

Griffin

D.W.

(1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79–98.

24.

Neff

L.A.

Karney

B.R.

(2005). To know you is to love you: The implications of global adoration and specific accuracy for marital relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 480–497.

25.

Pierce

G.R.

Sarason

I.G.

Sarason

B.R.

(1991). General and relationship-based perceptions of social support: Are two constructs better than one? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 1028–1039.

26.

Smith

R.E.

Shoda

Cumming

S.P.

Smoll

F.L.

(2009). Behavioral signatures at the ballpark: Intraindividual consistency of adults’ situation-behavior patterns and their interpersonal consequences. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 187–195.

27.

Swann

W.B.

Jr. (1984). The quest for accuracy in person perception: A matter of pragmatics. Psychological Review, 91, 457–477.

28.

Willis

Todorov

(2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598.

29.

Wood

Brumbaugh

(2009). Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1226–1244.

30.

Wright

J.C.

Mischel

(1988). Conditional hedges and the intuitive psychology of traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 454–469.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.02 MB

0.00 MB