Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated time perception during apparent biological motion. Pictures of initial, intermediate, and final positions of a single movement were presented, with interstimulus intervals that were constant within trials but varied across trials. Movement paths were manipulated by changing the sequential order of body postures. Increasing the path length produced an increase in perceived movement velocity. To produce an implicit measure of apparent movement dynamics, we also asked participants to judge the duration of a frame surrounding the stimuli. Longer paths with higher apparent movement velocity produced shorter perceived durations. This temporal bias was attenuated for nonbody (Experiment 1) and inverted-body (Experiment 2) control stimuli. As an explanation for these findings, we propose an automatic top-down mechanism of biological-motion perception that binds successive body postures into a continuous percept of movement. We show that this mechanism is associated with velocity-dependent temporal compression. Furthermore, this mechanism operates on-line, bridging the intervals between static stimuli, and is specific to configural processing of body form.

Keywords

human body time perception apparent motion biological motion dance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blake

Shiffrar

(2007). Perception of human motion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 47–73.

Chatterjee

S. H.

Freyd

J. J.

Shiffrar

(1996). Configural processing in the perception of apparent biological motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 916–929.

Downing

P. E.

Jiang

Shuman

Kanwisher

(2001). A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science, 293, 2470–2473.

Flash

Hogan

(1985). The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. Journal of Neuroscience, 5, 688–1703.

Freyd

J. J.

(1983). The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 575–581.

Giese

M. A.

Poggio

(2003). Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 179–192.

Graf

Reitzner

Corves

Casile

Giese

Prinz

(2007). Predicting point-light actions in real-time. NeuroImage, 36, T22–T32.

Grosjean

Shiffrar

Knoblich

(2007). Fitts’s law holds for action perception. Psychological Science, 18, 95–99.

Johansson

(1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201–211.

10.

Kourtzi

Shiffrar

(1999). Dynamic representations of human body movement. Perception, 28, 49–62.

11.

Mather

Radford

West

(1992). Low-level visual processing of biological motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 249, 149–155.

12.

Reed

C. L.

Stone

V. E.

Bozova

Tanaka

(2003). The body inversion effect. Psychological Science, 14, 302–308.

13.

Shiffrar

Freyd

J. J.

(1990). Apparent motion of the human body. Psychological Science, 1, 257–264.

14.

Shiffrar

Freyd

J. J.

(1993). Timing and apparent motion path choice with human body photographs. Psychological Science, 4, 379–384.

15.

Stevens

J. A.

Fonlupt

Shiffrar

Decety

(2000). New aspects of motion perception: Selective neural encoding of apparent human movements. NeuroReport, 11, 109–115.

16.

Thornton

I. M.

Rensink

R. A.

Shiffrar

(2002). Active versus passive processing of biological motion. Perception, 31, 837–853.

17.

Tse

Intriligator

Rivest

Cavanagh

(2004). Attention and the subjective expansion of time. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1171–1189.

18.

Verfaillie

Daems

(2002). Representing and anticipating human actions in vision. Visual Cognition, 9, 217–232.

19.

Wearden

J. H.

Ferrara

(1995). Stimulus spacing effects in temporal bisection by humans. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 289–310.

20.

Wearden

J. H.

Ferrara

(1996). Stimulus range effects in temporal bisection by humans. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 24–44.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

1.91 MB

0.00 MB