A striking example of the constructive nature of visual perception is how the human visual system completes contours of occluded objects. To date, it is unclear whether perceptual completion emerges during early stages of visual processing or whether higher-level mechanisms are necessary. To answer this question, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation to disrupt signaling in V1/V2 and in the lateral occipital (LO) area at different moments in time while participants performed a discrimination task involving a Kanizsa-type illusory figure. Results show that both V1/V2 and higher-level visual area LO are critically involved in perceptual completion. However, these areas seem to be involved in an inverse hierarchical fashion, in which the critical time window for V1/V2 follows that for LO. These results are in line with the growing evidence that feedback to V1/V2 contributes to perceptual completion.
CrouzetS. M.CauchoixM. (2011). When does the visual system need to look back?The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 8706–8707.
2.
DavisG.DriverJ. (1998). Kanizsa subjective figures can act as occluding surfaces at parallel stages of visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 169–184.
3.
Grill-SpectorK.KourtziZ.KanwisherN. (2001). The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Research, 41, 1409–1422.
4.
Grill-SpectorK.MalachR. (2004). The human visual cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 649–677.
5.
HalgrenE.MendolaJ.ChongC. D. R.DaleA. M. (2003). Cortical activation to illusory shapes as measured with magnetoencephalography. NeuroImage, 18, 1001–1009.
6.
HarrisJ. J.SchwarzkopfD. S.SongC.BahramiB.ReesG. (2011). Contextual illusions reveal the limit of unconscious visual processing. Psychological Science, 22, 399–405.
7.
HochsteinS.AhissarM. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron, 36, 791–804.
8.
JuanC. H.WalshV. (2003). Feedback to V1: A reverse hierarchy in vision. Experimental Brain Research, 150, 259–263.
9.
KammerT. (1999). Phosphenes and transient scotomas induced by magnetic stimulation of the occipital lobe: Their topographic relationship. Neuropsychologia, 37, 191–198.
10.
KammerT.NusseckH. (1998). Are recognition deficits following occipital lobe TMS explained by raised detection thresholds?Neuropsychologia, 36, 1161–1166.
KoivistoM.RailoH.RevonsuoA.VanniS.Salminen-VaparantaN. (2011). Recurrent processing in V1/V2 contributes to categorization of natural scenes. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 2488–2492.
13.
KonenC. S.KastnerS. (2008). Two hierarchically organized neural systems for object information in human visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 224–231.
14.
LammeV. A. F. (2003). Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 12–18.
15.
LeeH.VeceraS. P. (2005). Visual cognition influences early vision. Psychological Science, 16, 763–768.
16.
LeeT. S.NguyenM. (2001). Dynamics of subjective contour formation in the early visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 98, 1907–1911.
17.
MacknikS. L.LivingstoneM. S. (1998). Neuronal correlates of visibility and invisibility in the primate visual system. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 144–149.
18.
MaertensM.PollmannS. (2005). fMRI reveals a common neural substrate of illusory and real contours in V1 after perceptual learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1553–1564.
19.
Montaser-KouhsariL.LandyM. S.HeegerD. J.LarssonJ. (2007). Orientation-selective adaptation to illusory contours in human visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 2186–2195.
MurrayM. M.FoxeD. M.JavittD. C.FoxeJ. J. (2004). Setting boundaries: Brain dynamics of modal and amodal illusory shape completion in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 6898–6903.
22.
MurrayM. M.ImberM. L.JavittD. C.FoxeJ. J. (2006). Boundary completion is automatic and dissociable from shape discrimination. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 12043–12054.
23.
MurrayM. M.WylieG. R.HigginsB. A.JavittD. C.SchroederC. E.FoxeJ. J. (2002). The spatiotemporal dynamics of illusory contour processing: Combined high-density electrical mapping, source analysis, and functional magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 5055–5073.
24.
MurrayS. O.KerstenD.OlshausenB. A.SchraterP.WoodsD. L. (2002). Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 15164–15169.
25.
Pascual-LeoneA.WalshV. (2001). Fast backprojections from the motion to the primary visual area necessary for visual awareness. Science, 292, 510–512.
26.
PegnaA. J.KhatebA.MurrayM. M.LandisT.MichelC. M. (2002). Neural processing of illusory and real contours revealed by high-density ERP mapping. NeuroReport, 13, 965–968.
27.
PessoaL.ThompsonE.NoëA. (1998). Finding out about filling-in: A guide to perceptual completion for visual science and the philosophy of perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 723–748.
28.
QiuF. T.von der HeydtR. (2005). Figure and ground in the visual cortex: V2 combines stereoscopic cues with gestalt rules. Neuron, 47, 155–166.
29.
RamsdenB. M.HungC. P.RoeA. W. (2001). Real and illusory contour processing in area V1 of the primate: A cortical balancing act. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 648–665.
30.
RaoR. P. N.BallardD. H. (1999). Predictive coding in the visual cortex: A functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 79–87.
31.
RensinkR. A.EnnsJ. T. (1998). Early completion of occluded objects. Vision Research, 38, 2489–2505.
32.
RitzlA.MarshallJ. C.WeissP. H.ZafirisO.ShahN. J.ZillesK.FinkG. R. (2003). Functional anatomy and differential time courses of neural processing for explicit, inferred, and illusory contours: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 19, 1567–1577.
33.
RoT.BreitmeyerB.BurtonP.SinghalN. S.LaneD. (2003). Feedback contributions to visual awareness in human occipital cortex. Current Biology, 13, 1038–1041.
34.
SeghierM. L.VuilleumierP. (2006). Functional neuroimaging findings on the human perception of illusory contours. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 595–612.
35.
SekulerA. B.PalmerS. E. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 95–111.
36.
ShipleyT. F.KellmanP. J. (1992). Strength of visual interpolation depends on the ratio of physically specified to total edge length. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 97–106.
TehovnikE. J.ToliasA. S.SultanF.SlocumW. M.LogothetisN. K. (2006). Direct and indirect activation of cortical neurons by electrical stimulation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 512–521.
42.
von der HeydtR.PeterhansE.BaumgartnerG. (1984). Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. Science, 224, 1260–1262.
43.
WalshV.Pascual-LeoneA. (2003). Transcranial magnetic stimulation: A neurochronometrics of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44.
WassermannE. M. (1998). Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June5–7, 1996. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 108, 1–16.
45.
WeigeltS.SingerW.MuckliL. (2007). Separate cortical stages in amodal completion revealed by functional magnetic resonance adaptation. BMC Neuroscience, 8, 70. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/8/70
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
