Previous research suggests that people construct mental time lines to represent and reason about time. However, is the ability to represent space truly necessary for representing events along a mental time line? Our results are the first to demonstrate that deficits in spatial representation (as a function of left hemispatial neglect) also result in deficits in representing events along the mental time line. Specifically, we show that patients with left hemispatial neglect have difficulty representing events that are associated with the past and, thus, fall to the left on the mental time line. These results demonstrate that representations of space and time share neural underpinnings and that representations of time have specific spatial properties (e.g., a left and a right side). Furthermore, it appears that intact spatial representations are necessary for at least some types of temporal representation.
AzouviP.SamuelC.Louis-DreyfusA.BernatiT.BartolomeoP.BeisJ.-M.. . . RousseauxM. (2002). Sensitivity of clinical and behavioural tests of spatial neglect after right hemisphere stroke. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 73, 160–166.
2.
BecchioC.BertoneC. (2006). Time and neglect: Abnormal temporal dynamics in unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2775–2782.
3.
BeisJ. M.KellerC.MorinN.BartolomeoP.BernatiT.ChokronS.. . . AzouviP. (2004). Right spatial neglect after left hemisphere stroke: Qualitative and quantitative study. Neurology, 63, 1600–1605.
4.
BisiachE.LuzzattiC. (1978). Unilateral neglect of representational space. Cortex, 14, 129–133.
5.
BoroditskyL. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–28.
6.
BoroditskyL.GabyA. (2010). Remembrances of times east: Absolute spatial representations of time in an aboriginal Australian community. Psychological Science, 21, 1635–1639. doi:10.1177/0956797610386621
7.
BoroditskyL.RamscarM. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13, 185–189.
8.
BuetiD.WalshV. (2009). The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1831–1840.
9.
CalabriaM.Jacquin-CourtoisS.MiozzoA.RossettiY.PadovaniA.CotelliM.MiniussiC. (2011). Time perception in spatial neglect: A distorted representation?Neuropsychology, 25, 193–200.
10.
CienkiA. (1998). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In KoenigJ. P. (Ed.), Discourse and cognition (pp. 189–204). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
11.
ClarkH. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In MooreT. E. (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York, NY: Academic Press.
12.
DoricchiF.GuarigliaP.GaspariniM.TomaiuoloF. (2005). Dissociation between physical and mental number line bisection in right hemisphere brain damage. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1663–1665.
13.
DriverJ.VuilleumierP. (2001). Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction. Cognition, 79, 39–88.
14.
FischerM. H. (2001). Cognition in the bisection task. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 460–462.
FuhrmanO.BoroditskyL. (2010). Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time: Evidence from an implicit nonlinguistic task. Cognitive Science, 34, 1430–1451. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01105.x
17.
GainottiG.MesserliP.TissotR. (1972). Qualitative analysis of unilateral spatial neglect in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 35, 545–550.
18.
GauthierL.DehautF.JoanetteY. (1989). The bells test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11, 49–53.
19.
GeversW.ReynvoetB.FiasW. (2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87, B87–B95.
HusainM.ShapiroK.MartinJ.KennardC. (1997). Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients. Nature, 385, 154–156.
22.
IshiharaM.KellerP. E.RossettiY.PrinzW. (2008). Horizontal spatial representations of time: Evidence for the STEARC effect. Cortex, 44, 454–461.
23.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1980). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. Journal of Philosophy, 77, 453–486.
24.
MilesL. K.NindL. K.MacraeC. N. (2010). Moving through time. Psychological Science, 21, 222–223. doi:10.1177/0956797609359333
25.
NúñezR. E.MotzB. A.TeuscherU. (2006). Time after time: The psychological reality of the ego- and time-reference-point distinction in metaphorical construals of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 21, 133–146.
26.
OliveriM.KochG.SalernoS.TorrieroS.Lo GerfoE.CaltagironeC. (2009). Representation of time intervals in the right posterior parietal cortex: Implications for a mental time line. NeuroImage, 46, 1173–1179.
27.
OuelletM.SantiagoJ.IsraeliZ.GabayS. (2010). Is the future the right time?Experimental Psychology, 57, 308–314. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000036
28.
RodeG.CottonF.RevolP.Jacquin-CourtoisS.RossettiY.BartolomeoP. (2010). Representation and disconnection in imaginal neglect. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2903–2911.
29.
SajA.VerdonV.VocatR.VuilleumierP. (2012). The anatomy underlying acute versus chronic spatial neglect also depends on clinical tests. Brain, 135(2), e207. Retrieved from http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/135/2/e207.full
30.
SajA.VuilleumierP. (2007). Neglect: Remembering the space left behind. Current Biology, 17, R1060–R1062.
31.
SantiagoJ.LupiáñezJ.PerezE.FunesM. J. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 512–516.
32.
SchenkenbergT.BradfordD. C.AjaxE. T. (1980). Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology, 30, 509–517.
33.
TorralboA.SantiagoJ.LupiáñezJ. (2006). Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science, 30, 745–757.
34.
TraugottE. (1978). On the expression of spatiotemporal relations in language. In GreenbergJ. H. (Ed.), Universals of human language. Vol. 3: Word structure (pp. 369–400). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
35.
TverskyB.KugelmassS.WinterA. (1991). Crosscultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 515–557.
36.
VerdonV.SchwartzS.LovbladK. O.HauertC. A.VuilleumierP. (2010). Neuroanatomy of hemispatial neglect and its functional components: A study using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Brain, 133, 880–894.
37.
VuilleumierP. (2007). Hemispatial neglect. In GodefroyO.BogousslavskyJ. (Eds.), The behavioral and cognitive neurology of stroke (pp. 148–197). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
VuilleumierP.OrtigueS.BruggerP. (2004). The number space and neglect. Cortex, 40, 399–410.
39.
VuilleumierP.ValenzaN.MayerE.RéverdinA.LandisT. (1998). Near and far visual space in unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology, 43, 406–410.
40.
WalshV. (2003). Time: The back-door of perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 335–338.
41.
WegerU. W.PrattJ. (2008). Time flies like an arrow: Space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental timeline. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 426–430.
42.
ZorziM.PriftisK.UmiltàC. (2002). Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 417, 138–139.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
