Cognitive skills predict academic performance, so schools that improve academic performance might also improve cognitive skills. To investigate the impact schools have on both academic performance and cognitive skills, we related standardized achievement-test scores to measures of cognitive skills in a large sample (N = 1,367) of eighth-grade students attending traditional, exam, and charter public schools. Test scores and gains in test scores over time correlated with measures of cognitive skills. Despite wide variation in test scores across schools, differences in cognitive skills across schools were negligible after we controlled for fourth-grade test scores. Random offers of enrollment to oversubscribed charter schools resulted in positive impacts of such school attendance on math achievement but had no impact on cognitive skills. These findings suggest that schools that improve standardized achievement-test scores do so primarily through channels other than improving cognitive skills.
AbdulkadirogluA.AngristJ. D.DynarskiS. M.KaneT. J.PathakP. A. (2011). Accountability and flexibility in public schools: Evidence from Boston’s charters and pilots. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 699–748.
2.
AllowayT. P.AllowayR. G. (2010). Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106, 20–29.
3.
AllowayT. P.PassolunghiM. C. (2011). The relationship between working memory, IQ, and mathematical skills in children. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 133–137.
Bergman NutleyS.SoderqvistS.BrydeS.ThorellL. B.HumphreysK.KlingbergT. (2011). Gains in fluid intelligence after training non-verbal reasoning in 4-year-old children: A controlled, randomized study. Developmental Science, 14, 591–601.
6.
BlairC.RazzaR. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78, 647–663.
7.
BormanG. D.HewesG. M.OvermanL. T.BrownS. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73, 125–230.
8.
BrownL.SherbenouR. J.JohnsenS. K. (2010). Test of Nonverbal Intelligence—Fourth edition (Version A). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corp.
9.
BurrageM. S.PonitzC. C.McCreadyE. A.ShahP.SimsB. C.JewkesA. M.MorrisonF. J. (2008). Age- and schooling-related effects on executive functions in young children: A natural experiment. Child Neuropsychology, 14, 510–524.
10.
CampbellF. A.RameyC. T.PungelloE.SparlingJ.Miller-JohnsonS. (2002). Early childhood education: Young adult outcomes from the Abecedarian Project. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 42–57.
11.
CarlssonM.DahlG. B.RoothD.-O. (2012, October). The effect of schooling on cognitive skills (Working Paper No. 18484). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w18484
12.
CaseR.KurlandD. M.GoldbergJ. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 386–404.
13.
CattellR. B. (1967). The theory of fluid intelligence and crystalized intelligence in relation to “culture fair” tests and its verification in children 9–12 years old. Revue de Psychologie Appliquée, 17, 135–154.
14.
CeciS. J. (1991). How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components? A reassessment of the evidence. Developmental Psychology, 27, 703–722.
15.
CeciS. J.WilliamsW. M. (1997). Schooling, intelligence, and income. American Psychologist, 52, 1051–1058.
16.
ChettyR.FriedmanJ. N.HilgerN.SaezE.SchanzenbachD. W.YaganD. (2011). How does your kindergarten classroom affect your earnings? Evidence from Project Star. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 1593–1660.
17.
CowanN. (2005). Working memory capacity: Essays in cognitive psychology. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
18.
CowanN.ElliottE. M.SaultsS. J.MoreyC. C.MattoxS.HismjatullinaA.ConwayA. R. (2005). On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 42–100.
19.
CoyleT. R.PillowD. R.SnyderA. C.KochunovP. (2011). Processing speed mediates the development of general intelligence (g) in adolescence. Psychological Science, 22, 1265–1269.
20.
DanemanM.CarpenterP. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.
21.
de KoningE.HamersJ. H. M.SijtsmaK.VermeerA. (2002). Teaching inductive reasoning in primary education. Developmental Review, 22, 211–241.
EngleR. W.KaneM. J.TuholskiS. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In MiyakeA.ShahP. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24.
EngleR. W.TuholskiS. W.LaughlinJ. E.ConwayA. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.
25.
FryA. F.HaleS. (1996). Processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence. Psychological Science, 7, 237–241.
26.
GathercoleS. E.PickeringS. J.KnightC.StegmannZ. (2004). Working memory skills and educational attainment: Evidence from National Curriculum Assessments at 7 and 14 years of age. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–16.
27.
HanushekE. A.RivkinS. G. (2010). Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review, 100, 267–271.
KailR.SalthouseT. A. (1994). Processing speed as a mental capacity. Acta Psychologica, 86, 199–225.
30.
KailR. V. (2007). Longitudinal evidence that increases in processing speed and working memory enhance children’s reasoning. Psychological Science, 18, 312–313.
31.
KlingbergT. (2010). Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 317–324.
32.
MackeyA. P.HillS. S.StoneS. I.BungeS. A. (2011). Differential effects of reasoning and speed training in children. Developmental Science, 14, 582–590.
33.
Maridaki-KassotakiK. (2002). The relation between phonological memory skills and reading ability in Greek-speaking children: Can training of phonological memory contribute to reading development?European Journal of Psychology of Education, 17, 63–75.
34.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education. (2011). Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System. Boston, MA: Author.
35.
McClellandM. M.AcockA. C.PiccininA.RheaS. A.StallingsM. C. (2013). Relations between preschool attention span-persistence and age 25 educational outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 314–324.
36.
McCreaS. M.MuellerJ. H.ParrilaR. K. (1999). Quantitative analyses of schooling effects on executive function in young children. Child Neuropsychology, 5, 242–250.
37.
RajahA.SundaramK. R.AnandkumarA. (2011). Changes in intellectual and academic performance of children following computer-based training: Preliminary results. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 53, 249–252.
38.
RitchieS. J.BatesT. C. (2013). Enduring links from childhood mathematics and reading achievement to adult socioeconomic status. Psychological Science, 24, 1301–1308.
39.
RuedaM. R.RothbartM. K.McCandlissB. D.SaccomannoL.PosnerM. I. (2005). Training, maturation, and genetic influences on the development of executive attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 14931–14936.
40.
St Clair-ThompsonH. L.GathercoleS. E. (2006). Executive functions and achievements in school: Shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 745–759.
41.
WechslerD. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fourth edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corp.
42.
WittM. (2011). School based working memory training: Preliminary finding of improvement in children’s mathematical performance. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 7, 7–15.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
