Research indicates that in-group favoritism is prevalent among both adults and children. Although research has documented that individuals do not consistently display an in-group bias, the conditions under which out-group preference exists are not well understood. In this study, participants (N = 462) aged 9 to 16 years judged in-group deviant acts that were either in line with or counter to a generic norm shared by both groups. The findings demonstrated, for the first time, that children preferred out-group over in-group deviance only when the in-group peer’s deviance was in line with the generic norm and a threat to their group’s identity. Participants justified their disapproval of these deviants by focusing on the need for group cohesion and loyalty, while they signified their approval by spotlighting the need for autonomy. Our findings suggest that children’s intergroup attitudes are influenced by how the behavior of their peers matches different levels of group norms.
AbramsD.RutlandA.CameronL. (2003). The development of subjective group dynamics: Children’s judgments of normative and deviant in-group and out-group individuals. Child Development, 74, 1840–1856. doi:10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00641.x
2.
BrechwaldW. A.PrinsteinM. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 166–179. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x
3.
BrownB. B.ClasenD.EicherS. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 22, 521–530. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.22.4.521
4.
CorriveauK. H.HarrisP. L. (2010). Preschoolers (sometimes) defer to the majority in making simple perceptual judgments. Developmental Psychology, 46, 437–445. doi:10.1037/a0017553
5.
DovidioJ. F.HewstoneM.GlickP.EstesV. (2010). Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
DunhamY.ChenE. E.BanajiM. (2013). Two signatures of implicit intergroup attitudes: Developmental invariance and early enculturation. Psychological Science, 24, 860–868. doi:10.1177/0956797612463081
7.
EcclesJ. S.RoeserR. W. (2013). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. In LernerR.EasterbrooksM. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 321–337). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
8.
FitzRoyS.RutlandA. (2010). Learning to control ethnic intergroup bias in childhood. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 679–693. doi:10.1002/ejsp.746
9.
GielingM.ThijsJ.VerkuytenM. (2010). Tolerance of practices by Muslim actors: An integrative social-developmental perspective. Child Development, 81, 1384–1399. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01480.x
10.
GriffithsJ. A.NesdaleD. (2006). In-group and out-group attitudes of ethnic majority and minority children. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 735–749. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.05.001
11.
HittiA.MulveyK. L.RutlandA.AbramsD.KillenM. (2014). When is it okay to exclude a member of the ingroup? Children’s and adolescents’ social reasoning. Social Development, 23, 451–459. doi:10.1111/sode.12047
12.
HornS. S. (2003). Adolescents’ reasoning about exclusion from social groups. Developmental Psychology, 39, 71–84. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.1.71
13.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
14.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.
15.
KillenM.RutlandA. (2011). Children and social exclusion: Morality, prejudice and group identity. Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
16.
KillenM.RutlandA.AbramsD.MulveyK. L.HittiA. (2013). Development of intra- and intergroup judgments in the context of moral and social-conventional norms. Child Development, 84, 1063–1080. doi:10.1111/cdev.12011
17.
KillenM.RutlandA.RuckM. (2011). Promoting equity, tolerance, and justice: Policy implications. SRCD Policy Report: Sharing Child and Youth Development Knowledge, 25, 1–33.
18.
KuhnD. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
LeeI. C.PrattoF.JohnsonB. T. (2011). Intergroup consensus/disagreement in support of group-based hierarchy: An examination of socio-structural and psycho-cultural factors. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 1029–1064. doi:10.1037/a0025410
20.
LevineJ. M.MorelandR. L. (2002). Group reactions to loyalty and disloyalty. In ThyeS. R.LawerE. J. (Eds.), Group cohesion, trust and solidarity: Advances in group processes (Vol. 19, pp. 203–228). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science.
21.
LewisA. C.ShermanS. J. (2010). Perceived entitativity and the black-sheep effect: When will we denigrate negative ingroup members?The Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 211–225. doi:10.1080/00224540903366388
22.
MarquesJ. M.AbramsD.PaezD.HoggM. A. (2001). Social categorization, social identification, and rejection of deviant group members. In HoggM. A.TindaleR. S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (Vol. 3, pp. 400–424). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
NesdaleD.LawsonM. J. (2011). Social groups and children’s intergroup attitudes: Can school norms moderate the effects of social group norms? Child Development, 82, 1594–1606. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01637.x
25.
NesdaleD.MaassA.DurkinK.GriffithsJ. (2005). Group norms, threat, and children’s racial prejudice. Child Development, 76, 652–663. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00869.x
26.
PintoI. R.MarquesJ. M.LevineJ. M.AbramsD. (2010). Membership status and subjective group dynamics: Who triggers the black sheep effect?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 107–119. doi:10.1037/a0018187
27.
RutlandA. (2013). How do children learn to actively control their explicit prejudice? In BanajiM. R.GelmanS. A. (Eds.), Navigating the social world: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (pp. 336–340). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
RutlandA.CameronL.MilneA.McGeorgeP. (2005). Social norms and self-presentation: Children’s implicit and explicit intergroup attitudes. Child Development, 76, 451–466. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00856.x
29.
RutlandA.KillenM.AbramsD. (2010). A new social-cognitive developmental perspective on prejudice: The interplay between morality and group identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 279–291. doi:10.1177/1745691610369468
30.
SaxeR. R.Whitfield-GabrieliS.ScholzJ.PelphreyK. A. (2009). Brain regions for perceiving and reasoning about other people in school-aged children. Child Development, 80, 1197–1209. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01325.x
31.
ShuttsK.KinzlerK. D.KatzR. C.TredouxC.SpelkeE. S. (2011). Race preferences in children: Insights from South Africa. Developmental Science, 14, 1283–1291. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01072.x
32.
SmetanaJ. G. (2013). Moral development: The social domain theory view. In ZelazoP. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of developmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 832–866). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
SomervilleL. H. (2013). The teenage brain: Sensitivity to social evaluation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 121–127. doi:10.1177/0963721413476512
34.
TajfelH. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In TajfelH. (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61–76). London, England: Academic Press.
35.
TurielE. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
36.
TurielE. (2006). The development of morality. In EisenbergN.DamonW.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 789–857). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
37.
WainrybC.ShawL.LaupaM.SmithK. R. (2001). Children’s, adolescents’, and young adults’ thinking about different types of disagreements. Developmental Psychology, 37, 373–386. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.37.3.373
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
