We used a visual illusion called motion repulsion as a model system for investigating competition between two mental representations. Subjects were asked to remember two random-dot-motion displays presented in sequence and then to report the motion directions for each. Remembered motion directions were shifted away from the actual motion directions, an effect similar to the motion repulsion observed during perception. More important, the item retrieved second showed greater repulsion than the item retrieved first. This suggests that earlier retrieval exerted greater inhibition on the other item being held in short-term memory. This retrieval-induced motion repulsion could be explained neither by reduced cognitive resources for maintaining short-term memory nor by continued inhibition between short-term memory representations. These results indicate that retrieval of memory representations inhibits other representations in short-term memory. We discuss mechanisms of retrieval-induced inhibition and their implications for the structure of memory.
AndersonM. C. (2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 415–445.
2.
AndersonM. C.BjorkR. A.BjorkE. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063–1087.
3.
AndersonM. C.GreenC.McCullochK. C. (2000). Similarity and inhibition in long-term memory: Evidence for a two-factor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1141–1159.
4.
AndersonM. C.SpellmanB. A. (1995). On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychological Review, 102, 68–100.
5.
BaddeleyA. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556–559.
6.
BaysP. M.CatalaoR. F. G.HusainM. (2009). The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. Journal of Vision, 9(10), Article 7. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/10/7.full
7.
BlakeR.CepedaN. J.HirisE. (1997). Memory for visual motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 353–369.
8.
BrainardD. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
9.
BrownJ. (1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 12–21.
10.
CavanaghP.AlvarezG. A. (2005). Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 349–354.
11.
CowanN. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 163–191.
12.
FougnieD.AlvarezG. A. (2011). Object features fail independently in visual working memory: Evidence for a probabilistic feature-store model. Journal of Vision, 11(12), Article 3. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/11/12/3.full
13.
HirisE.BlakeR. (1996). Direction repulsion in motion transparency. Visual Neuroscience, 13, 187–197.
14.
HuangJ.SekulerR. (2010a). Attention protects the fidelity of visual memory: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 13461–13471.
15.
HuangJ.SekulerR. (2010b). Distortions in recall from visual memory: Two classes of attractors at work. Journal of Vision, 10(2), Article 24. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/2/24.full
16.
JonidesJ.LewisR. L.NeeD. E.LustigC. A.BermanM. G.MooreK. S. (2008). The mind and brain of short-term memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 193–224.
17.
KangM. S.HongS. W.BlakeR.WoodmanG. F. (2011). Visual working memory contaminates perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 860–869.
18.
KimC. Y.BlakeR. (2005). Psychophysical magic: Rendering the visible “invisible.”Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 381–388.
19.
KuhlB. A.DudukovicN. M.KahnI.WagnerA. D. (2007). Decreased demands on cognitive control reveal the neural processing benefits of forgetting. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 908–914.
20.
KuhlB. A.RissmanJ.ChunM. M.WagnerA. D. (2011). Fidelity of neural reactivation reveals competition between memories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 5903–5908.
21.
LarocqueJ. J.Lewis-PeacockJ. A.PostleB. R. (2014). Multiple neural states of representation in short-term memory? It’s a matter of attention. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 5. Retrieved from http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00005/full
22.
LevyB. J.AndersonM. C. (2002). Inhibitory processes and the control of memory retrieval. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 299–305.
23.
LoganG. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users’ guide to the stop signal paradigm. In DagenbachD.CarrT. H. (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 189–239). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24.
MagnussenS.GreenleeM. W. (1999). The psychophysics of perceptual memory. Psychological Research, 62, 81–92.
MatherG.MouldenB. (1980). A simultaneous shift in apparent direction: Further evidence for a “distribution-shift” model of direction coding. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 325–333.
27.
McElreeB. (1996). Accessing short-term memory with semantic and phonological information: A time-course analysis. Memory & Cognition, 24, 173–187.
28.
NeeD. E.JonidesJ. (2008). Neural correlates of access to short-term memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 14228–14233.
29.
OberauerK. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 411–421.
30.
PelliD. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
31.
PetersonL. R.PetersonM. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193–198.
32.
RanganathC.BlumenfeldR. S. (2005). Doubts about double dissociations between short- and long-term memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 374–380.
33.
RauberH. J.TreueS. (1999). Revisiting motion repulsion: Evidence for a general phenomenon?Vision Research, 39, 3187–3196.
SuchowJ. W.BradyT. F.FougnieD.AlvarezG. A. (2013). Modeling visual working memory with the MemToolbox. Journal of Vision, 13(10), Article 9. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/13/10/9.full
36.
TulvingE.ArbuckleT. Y. (1966). Input and output interference in short-term associative memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 145–150.
37.
VisserT. A.BischofW. F.Di LolloV. (1999). Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains: Evidence from the attentional blink. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 458–469.
38.
WilliamsM.PougetP.BoucherL.WoodmanG. F. (2013). Visual-spatial attention aids the maintenance of object representations in visual working memory. Memory & Cognition, 41, 698–715.
39.
ZhangW.LuckS. J. (2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 453, 233–235.
40.
ZhangW.LuckS. J. (2009). Sudden death and gradual decay in visual working memory. Psychological Science, 20, 423–428.
41.
ZokaeiN.GorgoraptisN.BahramiB.BaysP. M.HusainM. (2011). Precision of working memory for visual motion sequences and transparent motion surfaces. Journal of Vision, 11(14), Article 2. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/11/14/2.full
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
