During close interactions with fellow group members, humans look into one another’s eyes, follow gaze, and quickly grasp emotion signals. The eye-catching morphology of human eyes, with unique eye whites, draws attention to the middle part, to the pupils, and their autonomic changes, which signal arousal, cognitive load, and interest (including social interest). Here, we examined whether and how these changes in a partner’s pupils are processed and how they affect the partner’s trustworthiness. Participants played incentivized trust games with virtual partners, whose pupils dilated, remained static, or constricted. Results showed that (a) participants trusted partners with dilating pupils and withheld trust from partners with constricting pupils, (b) participants’ pupils mimicked changes in their partners’ pupils, and (c) dilation mimicry predicted trust in in-group partners, whereas constriction mimicry did not. We suggest that pupil-contingent trust is in-group bounded and possibly evolved in and because of group life.
AdolphsR.TranelD.DamasioA. R. (1998). The human amygdala in social judgment. Nature, 393, 470–474.
2.
AmemiyaS.OhtomoK. (2012). Effect of the observed pupil size on the amygdala of the beholders. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 332–341.
3.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.
4.
AxelrodR.HamiltonW. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390–1396.
5.
BagiellaE.SloanR. P.HeitjanD. F. (2000). Mixed-effects models in psychophysiology. Psychophysiology, 37, 13–20.
6.
BallietD.WuJ.De DreuC. K. W. (2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1556–1581.
7.
Baron-CohenS.JolliffeT.MortimoreC.RobertsonM. (1997). Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 813–822.
8.
BergJ.DickhautJ.McCabeK. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122–142.
9.
BowlesS.GintisH. (2011). A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
BradshawJ. (1967). Pupil size as a measure of arousal during information processing. Nature, 216, 515–516.
11.
ChartrandT. L.BarghJ. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.
12.
CikaraM.Van BavelJ. J. (2014). The neuroscience of intergroup relations: An integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 245–274.
13.
CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (2005). Detecting cheaters. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 505–506.
14.
De DreuC. K. W.BallietD. P.HalevyN. (2014). Parochial cooperation in humans: Forms and functions of self-sacrifice in intergroup conflict. In ElliotA. (Ed.), Advances in motivational science (Vol. 1, pp. 1–48). New York, NY: Elsevier.
15.
De DreuC. K. W.GreerL. L.HandgraafM. J.ShalviS.Van KleefG. A.BaasM.. . . FeithS. W. W. (2010). The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science, 328, 1408–1411.
16.
DemosK. E.KelleyW. M.RyanS. L.DavisF. C.WhalenP. J. (2008). Human amygdala sensitivity to the pupil size of others. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2729–2734.
17.
DimbergU. (1982). Facial reactions to facial expressions. Psychophysiology, 19, 643–647.
18.
FarmerH.McKayR.TsakirisM. (2014). Trust in me: Trustworthy others are seen as more physically similar to the self. Psychological Science, 25, 290–292.
19.
FarroniT.CsibraG.SimionF.JohnsonM. H. (2002). Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 9602–9605.
20.
HallE. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
21.
HarrisonN. A.GrayM. A.CritchleyH. D. (2009). Dynamic pupillary exchange engages brain regions encoding social salience. Social Neuroscience, 4, 233–243.
22.
HarrisonN. A.SingerT.RotshteinP.DolanR. J.CritchleyH. D. (2006). Pupillary contagion: Central mechanisms engaged in sadness processing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 5–17.
23.
HatfieldE.CacioppoJ. T.RapsonR. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24.
HessE. H. (1975). The role of pupil size in communication. Scientific American, 233(5), 110–112, 116–119.
25.
HessU.FischerA. (2013). Emotional mimicry as social regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 142–157.
26.
KobayashiH.KohshimaS. (1997). Unique morphology of the human eye. Nature, 387, 767–768.
27.
KomoritaS. S.ParksC. D. (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 183–207.
KretM. E.RoelofsK.StekelenburgJ. J.de GelderB. (2013). Emotional signals from faces, bodies and scenes influence observers’ face expressions, fixations and pupil-size. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 810. Retrieved from http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00810/full
30.
KretM. E.StekelenburgJ. J.RoelofsK.de GelderB. (2013). Perception of face and body expressions using electromyography, pupillometry and gaze measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 28. Retrieved from http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00028/full
LeeD. H.SusskindJ. M.AndersonA. K. (2013). Social transmission of the sensory benefits of eye widening in fear expressions. Psychological Science, 24, 957–965.
34.
LevensonR. W.GottmanJ. M. (1983). Marital interaction: Physiological linkage and affective exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 587–597.
35.
MatsumotoD.EkmanP. (1989). American-Japanese cultural differences in judgments of facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 13, 143–157.
36.
NiedenthalP. M.BrauerM.HalberstadtJ. B.Innes-KerA. H. (2001). When did her smile drop? Contrast effects in the influence of emotional state on the detection of change in emotional expression. Cognition & Emotion, 15, 853–864.
ParksC. D.JoiremanJ.Van LangeP. A. M. (2013). Cooperation, trust, and antagonism: How public goods are promoted. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 119–165.
39.
ReedR. G.RandallA. K.PostJ. H.ButlerE. A. (2013). Partner influence and in-phase versus anti-phase physiological linkage in romantic couples. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 88, 309–316.
40.
SchrammelF.PannaschS.GraupnerS. T.MojzischA.VelichkovskyB. M. (2009). Virtual friend or threat? The effects of facial expression and gaze interaction on psychophysiological responses and emotional experience. Psychophysiology, 46, 922–931.
41.
StirratM.PerrettD. I. (2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21, 349–354.
42.
TamiettoM.CastelliL.VighettiS.PerozzoP.GeminianiG.WeiskrantzL.de GelderB. (2009). Unseen facial and bodily expressions trigger fast emotional reactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 17661–17666.
43.
TamiettoM.de GelderB. (2010). Neural bases of the non-conscious perception of emotional signals. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 697–709.
44.
van der SchalkJ.HawkS. T.FischerA. H.DoosjeB. (2011). Moving faces, looking places: Validation of the Amsterdam Dynamic Facial Expression Set (ADFES). Emotion, 11, 907–920.
45.
WinstonJ. S.StrangeB. A.O’DohertyJ.DolanR. J. (2002). Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 277–283.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
