Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Speakers of all languages gesture, but there are differences in the gestures that they produce. Do speakers learn language-specific gestures by watching others gesture or by learning to speak a particular language? We examined this question by studying the speech and gestures produced by 40 congenitally blind adult native speakers of English and Turkish (n = 20/language), and comparing them with the speech and gestures of 40 sighted adult speakers in each language (20 wearing blindfolds, 20 not wearing blindfolds). We focused on speakers’ descriptions of physical motion, which display strong cross-linguistic differences in patterns of speech and gesture use. Congenitally blind speakers of English and Turkish produced speech that resembled the speech produced by sighted speakers of their native language. More important, blind speakers of each language used gestures that resembled the gestures of sighted speakers of that language. Our results suggest that hearing a particular language is sufficient to gesture like a native speaker of that language.

Keywords

gestures cross-cultural differences language development language

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barr

D. J.

(2013). Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 328. Retrieved from http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00328/full

Barr

D. J.

Levy

Scheepers

Tily

H. J.

(2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.

Bates

Maechler

Bolker

Walker

(2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using ‘Eigen’ and S4 [R Package Version 1.0-6]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4

Choi

Bowerman

(1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83–121.

Feyereisen

de Lannoy

J. D.

(1991). Gestures and speech: Psychological investigations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Furman

Küntay

A. C.

Özyürek

(2014). Early language-specificity of children’s event encoding in speech and gesture: Evidence from caused motion in Turkish. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 620–634.

Goldin-Meadow

(2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Gullberg

Hendricks

Hickmann

(2008). Learning to talk and gesture about motion in French. First Language, 28, 200–236.

Iverson

J. M.

Capirci

Volterra

Goldin-Meadow

(2008). Learning to talk in a gesture-rich world: Early communication in Italian vs. American children. First Language, 28, 164–181.

10.

Iverson

J. M.

Goldin-Meadow

(1998). Why people gesture as they speak. Nature, 396, 228.

11.

Kendon

(1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In Key

M. R.

(Ed.), Relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207–228). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.

12.

Kendon

(1995). Andrea De Jorio—the first ethnographer of gesture? Visual Anthropology, 7, 375–394.

13.

Kendon

(2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Kita

Özyürek

(2003). What does crosslinguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16–32.

15.

McNeill

(1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about language and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

16.

Özçalışkan

. (2015a). Do gestures follow speech in bilinguals’ description of motion? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S1366728915000796

17.

Özçalışkan

. (2015b). Ways of crossing a spatial boundary in typologically distinct languages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 485–508.

18.

Özçalışkan

Ş.

Slobin

D. I.

(1999). Learning ‘how to search for the frog’: Expression of manner of motion in English, Spanish and Turkish. In Greenhill

Littlefield

Tano

(Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 541–552). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

19.

Özyürek

Kita

Allen

Brown

Furman

Ishizuka

(2008). Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: Motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1040–1054.

20.

R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.0.2) [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

21.

Slobin

(1996). From “thought” and “language” to “thinking for speaking.” In Gumperz

J. J.

Levinson

S. C.

(Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

22.

Talmy

(2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.58 MB

0.00 MB

0.43 MB