During interracial encounters, well-intentioned European Americans sometimes engage in subtle displays of anxiety, which can be interpreted as signs of racial bias by African American partners. In the present research, same-race and cross-race stranger dyads (N = 123) engaged in getting-acquainted tasks, during which measures of sympathetic nervous system responses (preejection period, PEP) and heart rate variability were continuously collected. PEP scores showed that African American partners had stronger physiological linkage to European American partners who evidenced greater anxiety—greater cortisol reactivity, behavioral tension, and self-reported discomfort—which suggests greater physiological responsiveness to momentary changes in partners’ affective states when those partners were anxious. European Americans showed physiological linkage to African American and European American partners, but linkage did not vary as a function of their partner’s anxiety. Using physiological linkage offers a novel approach to understanding how affective responses unfold during dynamic intergroup interactions.
BergsiekerH. B.SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 248–264. doi:10.1037/a0018474
2.
BerntsonG. G.BiggerJ. T.Jr.EckbergD. L.GrossmanP.KaufmannP. G.MalikM., . . . van der MolenM. W. (1997). Heart rate variability: Origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology, 34, 623–648.
3.
BlascovichJ.MendesW. B.SeeryM. D. (2002). Intergroup encounters and threat: A multi-method approach. In MackieD. M.SmithE. R. (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 89–109). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
4.
CasteelC. A. (1998). Teacher-student interactions and race in integrated classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 115–120. doi:10.1080/00220679809597583
5.
CooperL. A.RoterD. L.CarsonK. A.BeachM. C.SabinJ. A.GreenwaldA. G.InuiT. S. (2012). The associations of clinicians’ implicit attitudes about race with medical visit communication and patient ratings of interpersonal care. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 979–987. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300558
6.
DickersonS. S.KemenyM. E. (2004). Acute stressors and cortisol responses: A theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 355–391. doi:10.1037.0033-2909.130.3.355
7.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (2004). Aversive racism. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 1–52). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36001-6
8.
DovidioJ. F.KawakamiK.GaertnerS. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62–68. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.62
9.
GrayH.MendesW. B.Denny-BrownC. (2008). An in-group advantage in detecting intergroup anxiety. Psychological Science, 19, 1233–1237.
10.
GuastelloS. J.PincusD.GundersonP. R. (2006). Electrodermal arousal between participants in a conversation: Nonlinear dynamics and linkage effects. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 10, 365–399.
11.
HansenA. L.JohnsonB. H.ThayerJ. F. (2003). Vagal influence on working memory and attention. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 48, 263–274. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(03)00073-4
12.
HessU.BlairyS. (2001). Facial mimicry and emotional contagion to dynamic emotional facial expressions and their influence on decoding accuracy. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40, 129–141. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00161-6
13.
HeymanR. E.LorberM. F.EddyJ. M.WestT. V. (2014). Behavioral observation and coding. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 345–372). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
14.
HoxJ. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
KashyD. A.KennyD. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (1st ed., pp. 451–477). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17.
KennyD. A.LedermannT. (2010). Detecting, measuring, and testing dyadic patterns in the actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 359–366. doi:10.1037/a0019651
18.
KnappM. L.HallJ. A.HorganT. G. (2014). Nonverbal communication in human interaction. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
19.
KoslovK. R. (2010). Pounding hearts and brittle smiles: The effect of resource depletion on outgroup positivity (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database. (UMI No. 3414826)
20.
KrausM. W.MendesW. B. (2013). Sartorial symbols of social class elicit class-consistent behavioral and physiological responses: A dyadic approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2330–2340. doi:10.1037/xge0000023
21.
LevensonR. W.RuefA. M. (1997). Physiological aspects of emotional knowledge and rapport. In IchesW. J. (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 44–72). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22.
LovalloW. R.ThomasT. L. (2000). Stress hormones in psychophysiological research. In CacioppoJ. T.TassinaryL. G.BerntsonG. G. (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 342–367). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23.
LovingT. J.GleasonM. E. J.PopeM. T. (2009). Transition novelty moderates daters’ cortisol responses when talking about marriage. Personal Relationships, 16, 187–203. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01218.x
24.
MendesW. B. (2016). Emotion and the autonomic nervous system. In BarrettL. F.LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 166–181). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25.
MendesW. B.KoslovK. (2013). Brittle smiles: Positive biases toward stigmatized and outgroup targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 923–933. doi:10.1037/a0029663
26.
MendesW. B.MajorB.McCoyS.BlascovichJ. (2008). How attributional ambiguity shapes physiological and emotional responses to social rejection and acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 278–291. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.278
27.
Mendoza-DentonR.DowneyG.PurdieV. J.DavisA.PietrzakJ. (2002). Sensitivity to status-based rejection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 896–918. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.896
28.
Page-GouldE.Mendoza-DentonR.TroppL. R. (2008). With a little help from my cross-group friend. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1080–1094. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1080
29.
PennerL. A.DovidioJ. F.GonzalezR.AlbrechtT. L.ChapmanR.FosterT., . . . EgglyS. (2016). The effects of oncologist implicit racial bias in racially discordant oncology interactions. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 34, 2874–2881. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.66.3658
30.
PriemJ. S.SolomonD. H. (2011). Relational uncertainty and cortisol responses to hurtful and supportive messages from a dating partner. Personal Relationships, 18, 198–223. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01353.x
31.
RichesonJ. A.SheltonJ. N. (2005). Brief report: Thin slices of racial bias. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 75–86. doi:10.1007/s10919-004-0890-2
32.
RichesonJ. A.SheltonJ. N. (2007). Negotiating interracial interactions: Costs, consequences, and possibilities. Psychological Science, 16, 316–320. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00528.x
33.
RichesonJ. A.TrawalterS.SheltonJ. N. (2005). African Americans’ implicit racial attitudes and the depletion of executive function after interracial interactions. Social Cognition, 23, 336–352. doi:10.1521/soco.2005.23.4.336
34.
SchoebiD. (2008). The coregulation of daily affect in marital relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 595–604. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.22.3.595
35.
SherwoodA.AllenM. T.FahrenbergJ.KelseyR. M.LovalloW. R.van DoornenL. J. (1990). Methodological guidelines for impedance cardiography. Psychophysiology, 27, 1–23. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb02171.x
36.
SternC. D.WestT. V. (2014). Circumventing anxiety during interpersonal encounters to provide interest in contact: An implementation intention approach. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 82–93. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.09.008
37.
TattersallA. J.HockeyG. R. (1995). Level of operator control and changes in heart rate variability during simulated flight maintenance. Human Factors, 37, 682–698.
38.
WatersS. F.WestT. V.KarnilowiczH. R.MendesW. B. (2017). Affect contagion between mothers and infants: Exploring valence and touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 1043–1051. doi:10.1037/xge0000322
39.
WatersS. F.WestT. V.MendesW. B. (2014). Stress contagion: Physiological covariation between mothers and infants. Psychological Science, 25, 934–942. doi:10.1177/0956797613518352
40.
WestT. V. (2013). Repeated-measure methods with dyads. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 731–749). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41.
WestT. V.PearsonA. R.SternC. (2014). Anxiety perseverance in intergroup interaction: When incidental explanations backfire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 825–843. doi:10.1037/a0037941
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
