How accurate is memory? Although people implicitly assume that their memories faithfully represent past events, the prevailing view in research is that memories are error prone and constructive. Yet little is known about the frequency of errors, particularly in memories for naturalistic experiences. Here, younger and older adults underwent complex real-world experiences that were nonetheless controlled and verifiable, freely recalling these experiences after days to years. As expected, memory quantity and the richness of episodic detail declined with increasing age and retention interval. Details that participants did recall, however, were highly accurate (93%–95%) across age and time. This level of accuracy far exceeded comparatively low estimations among memory scientists and other academics in a survey. These findings suggest that details freely recalled from one-time real-world experiences can retain high correspondence to the ground truth despite significant forgetting, with higher accuracy than expected given the emphasis on fallibility in the field of memory research.
AizpuruaA.KoutstaalW. (2015). A matter of focus: Detailed memory in the intentional autobiographical recall of older and younger adults. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 145–155. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.006
2.
AlbaJ. W.HasherL. (1983). Is memory schematic?Psychological Bulletin, 93, 203–231. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.93.2.203
3.
ArmsonM. J.AbdiH.LevineB. (2017). Bridging naturalistic and laboratory assessment of memory: The Baycrest Mask Fit Test. Memory, 25, 999–1008. doi:10.1080/09658211.2016.1241281
4.
BainbridgeW. A.HallE. H.BakerC. I. (2019). Drawings of real-world scenes during free recall reveal detailed object and spatial information in memory. Nature Communications, 10(1), Article 5. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07830-6
5.
BarclayC. R.WellmanH. M. (1986). Accuracies and inaccuracies in autobiographical memories. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 93–103. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(86)90023-9
6.
BarryD. N.MaguireE. A. (2018). Remote memory and the hippocampus: A constructive critique. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 128–142. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.005
7.
BartlettF. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BradyT. F.KonkleT.AlvarezG. A.OlivaA. (2008). Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 14325–14329. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803390105
9.
BrewerW. F. (1988). Memory for randomly sampled autobiographical events. In NeisserU.WinogradE. (Eds.), Remembering reconsidered: Ecological and traditional approaches to the study of memory (pp. 21–90). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511664014.004
10.
BrewerW. F.TreyensJ. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207–230.
11.
BrewinC. R.AndrewsB.MickesL. (2020). Regaining consensus on the reliability of memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29, 121–125. doi:10.1177/0963721419898122
12.
BrewinC. R.LiH.NtarantanaV.UnsworthC.McNeilisJ. (2019). Is the public understanding of memory prone to widespread “myths”?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 2245–2257. doi:10.1037/xge0000610
13.
DedeA. J. O.FrascinoJ. C.WixtedJ. T.SquireL. R. (2016). Learning and remembering real-world events after medial temporal lobe damage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113, 13480–13485. doi:10.1073/pnas.1617025113
14.
DevittA. L.Monk-FromontE.SchacterD. L.AddisD. R. (2016). Factors that influence the generation of autobiographical memory conjunction errors. Memory, 24, 204–222. doi:10.1080/09658211.2014.998680
15.
DevittA. L.SchacterD. L. (2016). False memories with age: Neural and cognitive underpinnings. Neuropsychologia, 91, 346–359. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.08.030
16.
DiamondN. B.AbdiH.LevineB. (2020). Different patterns of recollection for matched real-world and laboratory-based episodes in younger and older adults. Cognition, 202, Article 104309. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104309
17.
DiamondN. B.LevineB. (2020). Linking detail to temporal structure in naturalistic-event recall. Psychological Science, 31, 1557–1572. doi:10.1177/0956797620958651
18.
EbbesenE. B.RienickC. B. (1998). Retention interval and eyewitness memory for events and personal identifying attributes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 745–762. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.745
19.
EbbinghausH. (1913). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York, NY: Columbia University.
20.
EvansJ. R.FisherR. P. (2011). Eyewitness memory: Balancing the accuracy, precision and quantity of information through metacognitive monitoring and control. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 501–508.
21.
FisherR.McCauleyM.GeiselmanR. (1994). Improving eyewitness testimony with the Cognitive Interview. In RossD. F.ReadJ. D.TogliaM. P. (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 245–272). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22.
GoldsmithM.KoriatA.PanskyA. (2005). Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting over time. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 505–525. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.010
23.
KoriatA.GoldsmithM. (1996). Memory metaphors and the real-life/laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memory. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 19, 167–188. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00042114
24.
KoriatA.GoldsmithM.PanskyA. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 481–537.
25.
LevineB.SvobodaE.HayJ. F.WinocurG.MoscovitchM. (2002). Aging and autobiographical memory: Dissociating episodic from semantic retrieval. Psychology and Aging, 17, 677–689. doi:10.1037//0882-7974.17.4.677
LintonM. (1975). Memory for real-world events. In NormanD. A.RumelhartD. E. (Eds.), Explorations in cognition (pp. 376–404). San Francisco, CA: Freeman & Company.
28.
LoftusE. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12, 361–366. doi:10.1101/lm.94705
29.
MahrJ. B.CsibraG. (2018). Why do we remember? The communicative function of episodic memory. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 41, Article e1. doi:10.1017/S0140525X17000012
30.
MarshE. J. (2007). Retelling is not the same as recalling: Implications for memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 16–20. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00467.x
31.
McKinnonM. C.PalomboD. J.NazarovA.KumarN.KhuuW.LevineB. (2015). Threat of death and autobiographical memory: A study of passengers from Flight AT236. Clinical Psychological Science, 3, 487–502. doi:10.1177/2167702614542280
32.
MisraP.MarconiA.PetersonM.KreimanG. (2018). Minimal memory for details in real life events. Scientific Reports, 8, Article 16701. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-33792-2
33.
NeisserU. (1981). John Dean’s memory: A case study. Cognition, 9, 1–22. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(81)90011-1
34.
OrnsteinP. A.Baker-WardL.GordonB. N.MerrittK. A. (1997). Children’s memory for medical experiences: Implications for testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 87–104. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199712)11:7<S87::AID-ACP556>3.0.CO;2-Z
35.
PooleD. A.WhiteL. T. (1993). Two years later: Effects of question repetition and retention interval on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 27, 975–986. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.6.975
36.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
37.
RichardsB. A.FranklandP. W. (2017). The persistence and transience of memory. Neuron, 94, 1071–1084. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.037
38.
RubinD. C.SchulkindM. D. (1997). The distribution of autobiographical memories across the lifespan. Memory & Cognition, 25, 859–866. doi:10.3758/BF03211330
39.
SchacterD. L.AddisD. R. (2007). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: Remembering the past and imagining the future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 773–786. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2087
40.
SekeresM. J.BonasiaK.St-LaurentM.PishdadianS.WinocurG.GradyC.MoscovitchM. (2016). Recovering and preventing loss of detailed memory: Differential rates of forgetting for detail types in episodic memory. Learning & Memory, 23, 72–82. doi:10.1101/lm.039057.115
41.
St. JacquesP. L.SchacterD. L. (2013). Modifying memory: Selectively enhancing and updating personal memories for a museum tour by reactivating them. Psychological Science, 24, 537–543. doi:10.1177/0956797612457377
42.
TalaricoJ. M.RubinD. C. (2003). Confidence, not consistency, characterizes flashbulb memories. Psychological Science, 14, 455–461.
43.
WixtedJ. T.MickesL.FisherR. P. (2018). Rethinking the reliability of eyewitness memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 324–335. doi:10.1177/1745691617734878
44.
WixtedJ. T.ReadJ. D.LindsayD. S. (2016). The effect of retention interval on the eyewitness identification confidence–accuracy relationship. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5, 192–203. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.04.006
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
