Working memory has been comprehensively studied in sensory domains, like vision, but little attention has been paid to how motor information (e.g., kinematics of recent movements) is maintained and manipulated in working memory. “Motor working memory” (MWM) is important for short-term behavioral control and skill learning. Here, we employed tasks that required participants to encode and recall reaching movements over short timescales. We conducted three experiments (N = 65 undergraduates) to examine MWM under varying cognitive loads, delays, and degrees of interference. The results support a model of MWM that includes an abstract code that flexibly transfers across effectors, and an effector-specific code vulnerable to interfering movements, even when interfering movements are irrelevant to the task. Neither code was disrupted by increasing visuospatial working memory load. These results echo distinctions between representational formats in other domains, suggesting that MWM shares a basic computational structure with other working memory subsystems.
AllenR. J.WatermanA. H.YangT.GrahamA. J. (2023). Working memory in action: Remembering and following instructions. In LogieR.CowanN.GathercoleS.EngleR.WenZ. (Eds.), Memory in science for society (1st ed., pp. 241–C10P193). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192849069.003.0010
2.
AtkinsonR. C.ShiffrinR. M. (1971). The control of short-term memory. Scientific American, 225(2), 82–91.
3.
BaddeleyA. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201
4.
BapiR. S.DoyaK.HarnerA. M. (2000). Evidence for effector independent and dependent representations and their differential time course of acquisition during motor sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, 132(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002219900332
5.
Barhorst-CatesE. M.IsaacsM. W.BuxbaumL. J.WongA. L. (2022). Action imitation via trajectory-based or posture-based planning. Human Movement Science, 83, 102951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2022.102951
6.
BaysP. M.WolpertD. M. (2006). Actions and consequences in bimanual interaction are represented in different coordinate systems. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(26), 7121–7126. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0943-06.2006
7.
BernardiN. F.DarainyM.OstryD. J. (2015). Somatosensory contribution to the initial stages of human motor learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(42), 14316–14326. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1344-15.2015
8.
BrayanovJ. B.PressD. Z.SmithM. A. (2012). Motor memory is encoded as a gain-field combination of intrinsic and extrinsic action representations. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(43), 14951–14965. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1928-12.2012
9.
CamosV. (2017). Domain-specific versus domain-general maintenance in working memory. In RossB. H. (Ed.), The Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 67, pp. 135–171). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2017.03.005
10.
CohenD. A.Pascual-LeoneA.PressD. Z.RobertsonE. M. (2005). Off-line learning of motor skill memory: A double dissociation of goal and movement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102(50), 18237–18241. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506072102
11.
Criscimagna-HemmingerS. E.DonchinO.GazzanigaM. S.ShadmehrR. (2003). Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89(1), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00622.2002
12.
CurtisC. E.RaoV. Y.D’EspositoM. (2004). Maintenance of spatial and motor codes during oculomotor delayed response tasks. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(16), 3944–3952. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5640-03.2004
13.
GraftonS. T.HazeltineE.IvryR. B. (2002). Motor sequence learning with the nondominant left hand. Experimental Brain Research, 146(3), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1181-y
14.
HadjiosifA. M.MoreheadJ. R.SmithM. A. (2023). A double dissociation between savings and long-term memory in motor learning. PLOS Biology, 21(4), Article e3001799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001799
15.
JaroslawskaA. J.GathercoleS. E.HolmesJ. (2018). Following instructions in a dual-task paradigm: Evidence for a temporary motor store in working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(11), 2439–2449. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021817743492
16.
JoinerW. M.BrayanovJ. B.SmithM. A. (2013). The training schedule affects the stability, not the magnitude, of the interlimb transfer of learned dynamics. Journal of Neurophysiology, 110(4), 984–998. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01072.2012
17.
JonesS. A. H.HenriquesD. Y. P. (2010). Memory for proprioceptive and multisensory targets is partially coded relative to gaze. Neuropsychologia, 48(13), 3782–3792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.10.001
KrakauerJ. W.GhilardiM.-F.GhezC. (1999). Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nature Neuroscience, 2(11), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1038/14826
20.
LiG.AllenR. J.HitchG. J.BaddeleyA. D. (2022). Translating words into actions in working memory: The role of spatial-motoric coding. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(10), 1959–1975. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218221079848
21.
LiuY.VannuscorpsG.CaramazzaA.Striem-AmitE. (2020). Evidence for an effector-independent action system from people born without hands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 117(45), 28433–28441. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2017789117
22.
LuckS. J.VogelE. K. (2013). Visual working memory capacity: From psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(8), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.006
23.
MalfaitN.OstryD. J. (2004). Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?Journal of Neuroscience, 24(37), 8084–8089. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1742-04.2004
24.
McDougleS. D.TaylorJ. A. (2019). Dissociable cognitive strategies for sensorimotor learning. Nature Communications, 10(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07941-0
25.
MoreyC. C. (2018). The case against specialized visual-spatial short-term memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144(8), 849–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000155
PosnerM. I.KonickA. F. (1966). Short-term retention of visual and kinesthetic information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(66)90006-7
28.
RanganathC.CohenM. X.BrozinskyC. J. (2005). Working memory maintenance contributes to long-term memory formation: Neural and behavioral evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(7), 994–1010. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929054475118
29.
RawR. K.WilkieR. M.AllenR. J.WarburtonM.LeonettiM.WilliamsJ. H. G.Mon-WilliamsM. (2019). Skill acquisition as a function of age, hand and task difficulty: Interactions between cognition and action. PLOS ONE, 14(2), Article e0211706. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211706
30.
R Core Team. (2023). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
31.
SainburgR. L.WangJ. (2002). Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: Independence of direction and final position information. Experimental Brain Research, 145(4), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1140-7
32.
ScheidtR. A.GhezC. (2007). Separate adaptive mechanisms for controlling trajectory and final position in reaching. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98(6), 3600–3613. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00121.2007
33.
SeemüllerA.FiehlerK.RöslerF. (2011). Unimodal and crossmodal working memory representations of visual and kinesthetic movement trajectories. Acta Psychologica, 136(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.014
34.
SheaC. H.KovacsA. J.PanzerS. (2011). The coding and inter-manual transfer of movement sequences. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 52. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00052
35.
SidartaA.van VugtF. T.OstryD. J. (2018). Somatosensory working memory in human reinforcement-based motor learning. Journal of Neurophysiology, 120(6), 3275–3286. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00442.2018
36.
SmythM. M.PearsonN. A.PendletonL. R. (1988). Movement and working memory: Patterns and positions in space. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 40(3), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724988843000041
37.
SmythM. M.PendletonL. R. (1989). Working memory for movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 41(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748908402363
38.
SperlingG. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 74, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093759
39.
VaillancourtD. E.RussellD. M. (2002). Temporal capacity of short-term visuomotor memory in continuous force production. Experimental Brain Research, 145(3), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1081-1
40.
van EdeF.ChekroudS. R.StokesM. G.NobreA. C. (2019). Concurrent visual and motor selection during visual working memory guided action. Nature Neuroscience, 22(3), 477–483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0335-6
41.
WiestlerT.Waters-MetenierS.DiedrichsenJ. (2014). Effector-independent motor sequence representations exist in extrinsic and intrinsic reference frames. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(14), 5054–5064. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5363-13.2014
42.
WongA. L.JaxS. A.SmithL. L.BuxbaumL. J.KrakauerJ. W. (2019). Movement imitation via an abstract trajectory representation in dorsal premotor cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(17), 3320–3331. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2597-18.2019
