Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2013-12
Neopositivism and the DSM psychiatric classification. An epistemological history. Part 2: Historical pathways,epistemological developments and present-day needs
Little is known about the concrete historical sources for the use of neopositivist operational criteria by the DSM-III. This paper suggests that distinct sources operated implicitly. The current usefulness of the operational approach is questioned. It is shown that: (a) in epistemology, neopositivism has been replaced by more adequate accounts; (b) psychologists rejected operational definitions because these were unable to define the majority of mental phenomena; (c) mental symptoms cannot be directly described as such, because they already make part of the psychiatric diagnosis to which they belong. In conclusion, diagnosing is based on the hermeneutical co-construction of mental symptoms. The failure of the neopositivist programme suggests that it is time to reconcile scientific formalization and semiotic activity.
AragonaM (2006) Aspettando la rivoluzione. Oltre il DSM-V: le nuove idee sulla diagnosi tra filosofia della scienza e psicopatologia. Rome: Editori Riuniti.
2.
AragonaM (2009a) The concept of mental disorder and the DSM-V. Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences2(1): 1–14.
3.
AragonaM (2009b) The role of comorbidity in the crisis of the current psychiatric classification system. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology16(1): 1–11.
4.
AragonaM (2009c) Il mito dei fatti. Una introduzione alla filosofia della psicopatologia. Rome: Crossing Dialogues.
5.
AragonaM (2013) Neopositivism and the DSM psychiatric classification. An epistemological history. Part 1: Theoretical comparison. History of Psychiatry24(2): 166–179.
6.
BerriosGE (2006) Introduction: the philosophies of psychiatry – conceptual history. History of Psychiatry17(4): 469–486.
7.
BerriosGEMarkováIS (2006) Symptoms – historical perspective and effect on diagnosis. In: BlumenfieldMStrainJJ (eds) Psychosomatic Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 27–38.
8.
BickhardMH (1992) Myths of science: misconceptions of science in contemporary psychology. Theory & Psychology2(3): 321–337.
9.
BickhardMH (2001) The tragedy of operationalism. Theory & Psychology11(1): 35–44.
10.
BridgmanPW (1927) The Logic of Modern Physics. New York: The Macmillan Company.
11.
CassidyWLFlanaganNBSpellmanMCohenME (1957) Clinical observations in manic-depressive disease: a quantitative study of one hundred manic-depressive patients and fifty medically sick controls. Journal of the American Medical Association164(14): 1535–1546.
FeighnerJPRobinsEGuzeSB. (1972) Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Archives of General Psychiatry26(1): 57–63.
14.
FeinsteinAR (1977) A critical overview of diagnosis in psychiatry. In: RakoffVMStancerHCKedwardHB (eds) Psychiatric Diagnosis. New York: Brunner/Mazel Inc., 189–206.
15.
GraceRC (2001) On the failure of operationalism. Theory & Psychology11(1): 5–33.
16.
GreenCD (1992) Of immortal mythological beasts: operationalism in psychology. Theory & Psychology2(3): 291–320.
17.
HempelCG (1961) Morning Session: Introduction to problems of taxonomy. In: ZubinJ (ed.) Field Studies in the Mental Disorders. Proceedings of the Work Conference on Problems in Field Studies in the Mental Disorders, February 15–19, 1959. New York: Grune & Stratton, 3–22.
18.
HempelCG (1965) Fundamentals of taxonomy. In:Aspects of Scientific Explanation and other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York and Toronto: Free Press: 137–154.
19.
HempelCG (1973) The meaning of theoretical terms: a critique to the standard empiricist construal. In: SuppesP (ed.) Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, IV, Vol.74. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, 367–378.
20.
JaspersK (1963) General Psychopathology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
KendellRECooperJEGourlayAJ. (1971) Diagnostic criteria of American and British psychiatrists. Archives of General Psychiatry25(2): 123–130.
22.
KendlerKSMuñozRAMurphyG (2010) The development of the Feighner criteria: a historical perspective. American Journal of Psychiatry167(2): 134–142.
23.
KochS (1992) Psychology’s Bridgman vs Bridgman’s Bridgman: an essay in reconstruction. Theory & Psychology2(3): 261–290.
24.
LeaheyTH (1980) The myth of operationalism. Journal of Mind and Behavior1(2): 127–143.
25.
LeaheyTH (1983) Operationism and ideology. A reply to Kendler. Journal of Mind and Behavior4(1): 81–90.
26.
MarkováISBerriosGE (2009) Epistemology of mental symptoms. Psychopathology42(6): 343–349.
27.
MarkováISBerriosGE (2012) Epistemology of psychiatry. Psychopathology45(4): 220–227.
28.
PfannenstillB (1951) A critical analysis of operational definitions. Theoria17(1–3): 193–209.
29.
RobinsEGuzeSB (1970) Establishment of diagnostic validity in psychiatric illness: its application to schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry126(7): 983–987.
30.
SchwartzMAWigginsOP (1986) Logical empiricism and psychiatric classification. Comprehensive Psychiatry27(2): 101–114.
31.
SkinnerBF (1931) The concept of the reflex in the description of behaviour. Journal of General Psychology5(4): 427–458.
32.
SpitzerRL (1980) Introduction. In: American Psychiatric Association (ed.) DSM-III. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edn.Washington, DC: APA, 1–12.
33.
SpitzerRL (2001) Values and assumptions in the development of DSM-III and DSM-III-R: an insider’s perspective and a belated response to Sadler, Hulgus, and Agich’s “On values in recent American psychiatric classification”. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease189(6): 351–359.
34.
SpitzerRLEndicottJRobinsE (1978) Research diagnostic criteria. Rationale and reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry35(6): 773–782.
35.
StoneTTBurrisBC (1950) Melancholia: clinical study of 50 selected cases. Journal of the American Medical Association142(3): 165–168.
