Abstract
Workers' perspectives have frequently been overlooked and ignored in the development and implementation of workplace literacy programs. Analysis of the classroom discourse of a literacy program run cooperatively by company and union at a US canning factory shows how, even in apparently `worker-centered' efforts, local discursive choices made by instructors may close off opportunities for students/employees to freely express their opinions and ideas. In this particular program, such choices effectively worked to move students/employees into subject-positions—into alignment with culturally stereotyped attitudes, behaviors, and values—that were desirable to company management.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
