This paper evaluates the model of ideal type care regimes, as introduced by Jane Lewis and Barbara Hobson, as a means of understanding the comparative position of lone mothers in different welfare regimes. It does this in the light of an application of the model to the case of Austria. We find that the model offers insights and advances in understanding the comparative situation of lone mothers in Austria, but the analysis also points to certain shortcomings in the model. Partly these are problem of range and, to adequately represent outcomes for lone mothers, a ‘negative’ dimension of poor outcomes needs to be developed for both the ideal types postulated - the ‘Caregiver Social Wage’ model and the ‘Parent/Worker’ model. Secondly, there is a problem of mis-specification of process, as revealed by the case of Austria where lone mothers seemed to be positioned in the ‘Parent/Worker’ model (if somewhat negatively), while married mothers were positioned within the ‘Caregiver Social Wage’ model. An answer may be to modify the specifications of the second ideal type as a ‘Caregiver/Breadwinner Social Wage’ model.
Auer, M. (2000) ‘The Relationship between Paid Work and Parenthood - a Comparison of Structures, Concepts and Developments in the United Kingdom and in Austria’, paper given at the Social Policy Association annual conference, Roehampton, July.
2.
Beham, M. and Wilk, L. (1990) Alleinerzieherinnen. Ein Bericht zu ihrer sozialen Lage und Erwerbssituation.Wien: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales.
3.
Bradshaw, J., Kennedy, S., Kilkey, M., Hutton, S., Corden, A., Eardley, T., Holmes, H. and Neale, J. (1996) The Employment of Lone Parents: a Comparison of Policy in 20 Countries.London/York: Family Policy Studies Centre/Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
4.
Bundesministerin für Frauenangelegenheiten (ed.) (1995) Bericht über die Situation der Frauen in Österreich. Frauenbericht 1995.Wien: Bundeskanzleramt.
5.
Bussemaker, J. and van Kersbergen, K. (1994) Gender and Welfare States: Some Theoretical Reflections', in D. Sainsbury (ed.) Gendering Welfare States, pp. 8-25. London: Sage.
6.
Bussemaker, J., van Drenth, A., Knijn, T. and Plantenga, J. (1997) ‘Lone Mothers in the Netherlands’, in J. Lewis (ed.) Lone Mothers in European Welfare Regimes: Shifting Policy Logics, pp. 96-120. London: Jessica Kingsley.
7.
Conroy, P. (1997) ‘Lone Mothers: the Case of Ireland’, in J. Lewis (ed.) Lone Mothers in European Welfare Regimes: Shifting Policy Logics, pp. 76-95. London: Jessica Kingsley.
8.
Czerny, M. (ed.) (1990) Zur Neugestaltung der Wohnungspolitik in Österreich.Wien: Österreichisher Institut für WirtscaftsfÖrchung.
9.
Daly, M. (1994) ‘Comparing Welfare States: Towards a Gender Friendly Approach’, in D. Sainsbury (ed.) Gendering Welfare States, pp. 101-117. London: Sage.
10.
de Acosta, M. (1997) Single Mothers in the USA: Unsupported Workers and Mothers', in S. Duncan and R. Edwards (eds) Single Mothers in an International Context: Mothers or Workers?, pp. 81-113. London: UCL Press.
11.
Duncan, S. (1995) ‘Theorizing European Gender Systems’, Journal of European Social Policy5 (4): 263-284.
12.
Duncan, S. (1996) The Diverse Worlds of European Patriarchy', in D. Garcia-Ramon and J. Monk (eds) Women of the European Union: the Politics of Work and Daily Life, pp. 74-110London: Routledge.
13.
Duncan, S. and Edwards, R. (eds) (1997) Single Mothers in an International Context.London: UCL Press.
14.
Duncan, S. and Edwards, R. (1999) Lone Mothers, Paid Work, and Gendered Moral Rationalities.London: Macmillan.
15.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.Cambridge: Polity Press.
16.
Fraser, N. (1994) ‘After the Family Wage: Gender Equity and Social Welfare’, Political Theory22 (4): 591-618.
17.
Fürster, W. (1996) ‘Austria’, in P. Balchin (ed.) Housing Policy in Europe, pp. 113-124. London: Routledge.
18.
Gustafsson, S. (1994) ‘Childcare and Types of Welfare States’, in D. Sainsbury (ed.) Gendering Welfare States, pp. 45-61. London: Sage.
19.
Hobson, B. (1994) ‘Solo Mothers, Social Policy Regimes, and the Logics of Gender’, in D. Sainsbury (ed.) Gendering Welfare States, pp. 170-187. London: Sage.
20.
Hobson, B. and Takahashi, M. (1997) ‘The Parentworker Model: Lone Mothers in Sweden’, in J. Lewis (ed.) Lone Mothers in European Welfare Regimes: Shifting Policy Logics, pp. 121-139. London: Jessica Kingsley.
21.
Kytir, J. (1992) ‘Zwischen “vermodern” and “postmodern” - familiengründungen in Österreich, 1984 bis 1990’, Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft18 (1): 117-133.
22.
Langan, M. and Ostner, I. (1991) ‘Gender and Welfare: Towards a Comparative Framework’, in G. Room (ed.) Towards a European Welfare State?, pp. 127-150. Bristol: School for Advanced Urban Studies.
23.
Leibfried, S. (1993) ‘Towards a European welfare state?’, in C. Jones (ed.) New Perspectives on the Welfare State in Europe, pp. 133-150. London: Routledge.
24.
Lewis, J. (1992) ‘Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy2 (3): 159-173.
25.
Lewis, J. (ed.)(1997) Lone Mothers in European Welfare Regimes: Shifting Policy Logics.London: Jessica Kingsley.
26.
Lewis, J. and Hobson, B. (1997) ‘Introduction’, in J. Lewis (ed.) Lone Mothers in European Welfare Regimes: Shifting Policy Logics, pp. 1-20. London: Jessica Kingsley.
27.
McLaughlin, E. and Rodgers, P. (1997) ‘Single mothers in the Republic of Ireland: mothers not workers’, in S. Duncan and R. Edwards (eds) Single Mothers in an International Context. London: UCL Press.
28.
Millar, J. (1996) ‘Mothers or Workers? Policy Approaches to Supporting Lone Mothers in Comparative Perspective’, in E. Bortolaia Silva (ed.) Good Enough Mothering? Feminist Perspectives on Lone Motherhood.London: Routledge.
29.
Mitterauer, M. (1984) Ledige Mütter. Zur Geschichte illegitimer Geburten in Europa.München: Beck.
30.
Neyer, G. (1995) ‘Institutionelle Kinderbetreuung in Österreich’, in Bundesministerin für Frauenangelegenheiten (ed.) Bericht über die Situation der Frauen in Österreich. Frauenbericht 1995, pp. 73-79. Wien: Bundeskanzleramt.
31.
O'Connor, J., Orloff, A. and Shaver, S. (1999) States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pfau-Effinger, B. (1998a) ‘Arbeitsmarkt- und Familiendynamik in Europa - Theoretische Grundlagen der vergleichenden Analyse’, in B. Geissler, F. Maier and B. Pfau-Effinger (eds) FrauenArbeitsMarkt, pp. 177-194. Berlin: Ed. Sigma.
35.
Pfau-Effinger, B. (1998b) ‘Gender Cultures and the Gender Arrangement - A Theoretical Framework for Cross-national Gender Research’, Innovation11 (2): 147-166.
36.
Sackmann, R. (1998) ‘European Gender Roles: Public Discourses and Regional Practices, Innovation11 (2): 167-190.
37.
Sackmann, R. (2000) ‘Living through the Myths: Gender, Values, Attitudes and Practices’, in S. Duncan and B. Pfau-Effinger (eds) Gender, Work and Culture in the EU, Ch. 9. London: Routledge.
38.
Sainsbury, D. (1994) ‘Women's and Men's Social Rights: Gendering Dimensions of Welfare States’, in D. Sainsbury (ed.) Gendering Welfare States, pp. 150-169. London: Sage.
39.
Strell, M. (1999) ‘The Housing Situation of Lone Mother Families: Austria and Finland in a Crossnational Perspective’, MZES Arbeitspapiere/Working Papers, Arbeitspapier 2, Mannheim.
40.
Traxler, F. (1998) ‘Austria: Still the Country of Corporatism’, in A. Ferner and R. Hyman (eds) Changing Industrial Relations in Europe, pp. 239-261. Oxford: Blackwell.
41.
Troper, R. and Steiner, W. (1989) Social Housing in Austria.Wien.
42.
Viazzo, P. (1989) Upland Communities: Environment, Population and Social Structure in the Alps since the Sixteenth Century.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Walby, S. (1994) ‘Methodological and Theoretical Issues in the Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations in Western Europe’, Environment and Planning A27 (9): 1339-1354.
44.
Warren, T. (2000) ‘Diverse Breadwinner Models: a Couple-based Analysis of Gendered Working Time in Britain and Denmark’, Journal of European Social Policy10 (4): 349-371.
