The idea of a Universal Inheritance (UI) has been recently gaining weight amongst scholars concerned over increasing wealth inequality. A UI consists of a one-off public payment of an agreed sum to each citizen of young adulthood. In this article, we provide the results of novel simulations to assess the cost and the distributive impact of such policy by testing different parameters for both the benefit amount and its financing. The simulations run on a top-tail adjusted version of the Household Financial Consumption Survey covering four countries: Finland, Germany, Ireland, and Italy. We find that, under some parameters, a UI would significantly reduce inequality and could be realistically financed by taxing the top 1%.
BachSThiemannAZuccoA (2019) Looking for the missing rich: tracing the top tail of the wealth distribution. International Tax and Public Finance26(6): 1234–1258.
7.
BanerjeeAVDufloE (2012) Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty. New York: Public Affairs.
8.
BidadanureJU (2021) Justice across Ages: Treating Young and Old as Equals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
CunliffeJErreygersG, eds. (2004) The Origins of Universal Grants: An Anthology of Historical Writings on Basic Capital and Basic Income. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
DaviesJB (1993) The distribution of wealth in Canada. Research on Economic Inequality4(1): 159–180.
11.
European Central Bank (2020) The Household Finance and Consumption Survey: Methodological Report for the 2017 Wave. Luxemburg: Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2866/66933 (Accessed 29 June 2023).
12.
FDD (2019) 15 Proposte per la Giustizia Sociale. In: Forum Disuguaglianze e Diversità. Roma: FDD.
13.
GoodinRE (2003) ‘Sneaking up on stakeholding’. In: DowdingKDe WispelaereJWhiteS (eds) The Ethics of Stakeholding. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 65–78. DOI: 10.1057/9780230522916_4.
14.
GosseriesAMeyerLH (eds) (2009) Intergenerational Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
HuangJBeverlySGClancyMM, et al. (2021) A Long-Term Experiment on Child Development Accounts: Update and Impacts of SEED for Oklahoma Kids (CSD Research Report No. 21-07). Washington, DC: Washington University, Center for Social Development.
16.
HuangJShanksTClancyMM, et al. (2024) Wealth-Building for All Children: Convergence and Evidence to Support a Nationwide Policy (CSD Policy Brief No. 24-04). Washington, DC: Washington University, Center for Social Development.
KrenekASchratzenstallerMGrünbergerK, et al. (2022) Intaxmod - inheritance and gift taxation in the context of ageing. In: JRC Working Papers on Taxation and Structural Reforms. Seville: Joint Research Center - European Comission.
19.
Le GrandJ (2005) Implementing stakeholder grants: the British case. In: AckermanBAAlstottAParijsPvan, et al. (eds) Redesigning Distribution: Basic Income and Stakeholder Grants as Alternative Cornerstones for a More Egalitarian Capitalism, the Real Utopias Project. London: Verso.
20.
Le GrandJNissanD (2003) A Capital Idea: Helping the Young to Help Themselves. In: DowdingKDe WispelaereJWhiteS (eds). The Ethics of Stakeholding. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 29–41. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522916_2.
21.
McKaySTianLLymerA (2024) Whatever happened to the Child Trust Fund? The abandonment of universal savings for UK children. Social Policy and Administration58(1): 18–38.
22.
MorelNPalierBPalmeJ (2011) Towards a social investment welfare state? In: Ideas, Policies and Challenges. Bristol: Policy Press.
23.
MorelliSNolanBPalominoJC, et al. (2021) Inheritance, gifts and the accumulation of wealth for low-income households. Journal of European Social Policy31(5): 533–548.
24.
MullainathanSShafirE (2013) Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much. New York: Times Books.
25.
NissanDLe GrandJ (2000) A capital idea: Start-up grants for young people. London, UK: Fabian Society.
26.
NogueraJASalazarLVidal LordaG (2022) Universal Benefits Workshop. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.
SummerfieldL (2023) Investigation into child Trust funds. In: HM Revenue and Customs. London: National Audit Office.
36.
Van ParijsP (1995) Real Freedom for All: What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism?1st edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/2960 (Accessed 20 September 2022).
37.
Van ParijsPVanderborghtY (2019) Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
VermeulenP (2018) How fat is the top tail of the wealth distribution?Review of Income and Wealth64(2): 357–387.
39.
WaltlSRChakrabortyR (2022) Missing the wealthy in the HFCS: micro problems with macro implications. The Journal of Economic Inequality20(1): 169–203.
40.
WhiteS (2011) Basic income versus basic capital: can we resolve the disagreement?Policy & Politics39(1): 67–81.
41.
WhiteS (2015) Basic capital in the egalitarian toolkit? basic capital in the egalitarian toolkit?Journal of Applied Philosophy32(4): 417–431.
WrightEO (2000) Reducing income and wealth inequality: real utopian proposals. Contemporary Sociology29(1): 143.
44.
WrightEO (2004) Basic income, stakeholder grants, and class analysis. Politics & Society32(1): 79–87.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
