The struggle involved in identifying as both feminist and psychologist has previously been explored. This project, which grew out of our experiences in a graduate course entitled `Theory and Practice of Narrative Research', examined our identities as Feminist Psychologists. In the tradition of social constructionist, hermeneutic, narrative work, we told stories, conducted interviews and engaged in dialogue based on our identities. The results indicate that it is not only feasible, but necessary for us, and possibly others, to identify as Feminist Psychologists. Based on the functional, multiple-case analysis of our narratives, we concluded that the meanings constructed through narratives, interviews and dialogues are our identities; conducting feminist psychological research enacts our identities. We found that combining identities was important, feminist process was essential, critiquing dominant paradigms was significant and creating and maintaining a safe space to do this identity work was necessary.
Belenky, M.F.
, Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R. and Tarule, J.M. (1986) Women's Ways of Knowing. New York: Basic Books.
2.
Berger, P.L.
and Luckmann, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
3.
Brown, L.M.
, Tappan, M.B., Gilligan, C., Miller, B.A. and Argyris, D.E. (1994) `Reading for Self and Moral Voice: A Method for Interpreting Narratives of Real-life Moral Conflict and Choice', pp. 161-189 in B. Pucka (ed.) Caring Voices and Women's Moral Frames: Gilligan's View. New York: Garland Publishing.
4.
Collins, P.H.
(1991) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
5.
Conway, J.K.
(1998) When Memory Speaks: Reflections on Autobiography. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
6.
Crosby, F.
, Todd, J. and Worrell, J. (1996) `Have Feminists Abandoned Social Activism? Voices from the Academy', pp. 85-102 in L. Montada and M. Lemer (eds) Current Concerns about Justice. New York: Plenum.
7.
Crossley, M.L.
(2000) `Deconstructing Autobiographical Accounts of Childhood Sexual Abuse: Some Critical Reflections', Feminism & Psychology10: 73-90.
8.
Deaux, K.
and Ethier, K.A. (1998) `Negotiating Social Identity', pp. 301-323 in J.K. Swim and C. Stangor (eds) Prejudice: The Target's Perspective. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9.
Fonow, M.M.
and Cook, J.A. (1991) `Back to the Future: A Look at the Second Wave of Feminist Epistemology and Methodology', pp. 1-15 in Beyond Methodology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
10.
Gergen, K.J.
(1985) `The Social Constructionist Movement in Modem Psychology', American Psychologist40: 266-275.
11.
Gergen, M.M.
(1988) `Toward a Feminist Metatheory and Methodology in the Social Sciences', pp. 87-104 in M.M. Gergen (ed.) Feminist Thought and the Structure of Knowledge. New York: New York University Press.
12.
Henderson-King, D.
and Stewart, A.J. (1997) `Feminist Consciousness: Perspectives on Women's Experience', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin23: 415-426.
13.
Kimmel, E.
(1989) `The Experience of Feminism', Psychology of Women Quarterly13: 133-146.
14.
Kitzinger, C.
(1990) `Resisting the Discipline', pp. 119-136 in E. Burman (ed.) Feminists and Psychological Practice. London: Sage.
15.
Kitzinger, C.
and Perkins, R. (1993) `Feminism or Psychology', pp. 1-31 in Changing our Minds: Lesbian Feminism and Psychology. New York: New York University Press.
16.
Klonis, S.
, Endo, J., Crosby, F. and Worrell, J. (1997) `Feminism as Life Raft', Psychology of Women Quarterly21: 333-345.
17.
Kmiec, J.
, Crosby, F. and Worrell, J. (1996) `Walking the Talk', pp. 49-61 in K.F. Wyche and F. Crosby (eds) Women's Ethnicities: Journeys Through Psychology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
18.
Mishler, E.G.
(1995) `Models of Narrative Analysis: A Typology', Journal of Narrative and Life History5: 87-123.
19.
Riessman, C.K.
(1990) Divorce Talk: Women and Men Make Sense of Personal Relationships. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
20.
Riger, S.
(1992) `Epistemological Debates, Feminist Voices: Science, Social Values, and the Study of Women', American Psychologist47: 730-740.
21.
Romero, M.
and Stewart, A.J., eds (1999) Women's Untold Stories: Breaking Silence, Talking Back, Voicing Complexity. New York: Routledge.
22.
Rosenwald, G.
(1988) `A Theory of Multiple-case Research', Journal of Personality56: 239-264.
23.
Stewart, A.J.
and Shields, S.A. (2001) `Gatekeepers as Change Agents: What are Feminist Psychologists Doing in Places Like This?', pp. 304-318 in D.L. Tolman and M. Brydon-Miller (eds) From Subjects to Subjectivities: A Handbook of Interpretive and Participatory Methods. New York: New York University Press.
24.
Sullivan, E.V.
(1984) `Metaphors of Understanding: A Critical Introduction', pp. 1-31 in A Critical Psychology: Interpretation of the Personal World. New York: Plenum Press.
25.
Unger, R.
(1992) `Through the Looking Glass: No Wonderland Yet! (The Reciprocal Relationship between Methodology and Models of Reality)', pp. 147-170 in J.S. Bohan (ed.) Seldom Seen, Rarely Heard: Women's Place in Psychology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26.
West, C.
and Zimmerman, D.H. (1987) `Doing Gender', Gender & Society1: 125-151.
27.
Woolfolk, R.L.
, Sass, L.A. and Messer, S.B. (1988) `Introduction to Hermeneutics', pp. 2-26 in S.B. Messer, L.A. Sass and R.L. Woolfolk (eds) Hermeneutics and Psychological Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
28.
Young, A.M.
, Stewart, A.J. and Miner-Rubino, K. (2001) `Women's Understandings of Their Own Divorces: A Developmental Perspective', pp. 203-226 in D.P. McAdams, R. Josselson and A. Lieblich (eds) Turns in the Road: Narrative Studies of Lives in Transition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
