Despite an increasing number of restrictions on accessing abortion care in the United States, most Americans remain unaware of challenges to obtaining abortion. Theorists of abortion stigma have posited that entertainment media contribute to ongoing lack of knowledge about abortion care. Analyzing all plotlines that aired on American television between 2005 and 2015 in which abortion is considered (n = 89), we examine how access to abortion is portrayed, whether characters are able to surmount barriers, and what documented real-life challenges to access are missing from onscreen representations. We find that 42% show at least one barrier to accessing abortion care, most frequently illegality, cost of the procedure, and social stigma. Almost no barriers—including illegality—are insurmountable, and most are easily overcome for the characters seeking abortion. Some barriers, however, change how abortion is understood by a character such that she opts to continue the pregnancy. This underrepresentation of the difficulty of obtaining abortion care may contribute to public beliefs that abortion restrictions do not pose real challenges for women’s access to abortion.
AnnasG. (1995) Sex, money, and bioethics. Hastings Center Report25(5): 40–44.
2.
BessettD.GerdtsC.LittmanL.KavanaughM.NorrisA. (2015) Does state-level context matter for individuals' knowledge about abortion, legality and health? Challenging the ‘red states v. blue states' hypothesis. Culture, Health & Sexuality17: 733–746.
3.
BiggsA.GouldH.FosterD. (2013) Understanding why women seek abortions in the US. BMC Women's Health13(29)
4.
BullockH.WycheK.WilliamsW. (2001) Media images of the poor. Journal of Social Issues57: 229–246.
5.
ClawsonR.TriceR. (2000) Poverty as we know it: Media portrayals of the poor. The Public Opinion Quarterly64: 53–64.
6.
CockrillK.WeitzT. (2010) Abortion patients' perceptions of abortion regulation. Women's Health Issues20: 12–19.
7.
DennisA.ManskiR.BlanchardK. (2012) Looking back at the Hyde Amendment and looking forward to restoring public funding: A research and policy report, Washington, DC: Center for Women Policy Studies.
8.
DennisA.ManskiR.BlanchardK. (2015) A qualitative exploration of low-income women's experiences accessing abortion in Massachusetts. Women's Health Issues25: 463–469.
9.
DiemS.LantosJ.TulskyJ. (1996) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on television. New England Journal of Medicine334: 1578–1582.
10.
DonovanP. (1995) The politics of blame: Family planning, abortion, and the poor, New York: Alan Guttmacher Institute.
11.
EvansB.O'BrienE. (2014) The Cairns abortion trial: Language, deviance, and the ‘spoiled identity'. Journal of Sociology51: 755–768.
12.
FinerL.FrohwirthL.DauphineeL.SusheelaS.MooreA. (2005) Reasons US women have abortions: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health37: 110–118.
13.
FosterD.KimportK.GouldH.RobertsS.WeitzT. (2013) Effect of abortion protesters on women's emotional response to abortion. Contraception87: 81–87.
14.
FriedM. (1998) Abortion in the United States – Legal but inaccessible. In: SolingerR. (eds) Abortion wars: A half century of struggle, 1950–2000, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 208–226.
15.
Guttmacher Institute (2015a) Laws affecting reproductive health and rights: State trends at midyear, 2015, New York: Guttmacher Institute.
16.
Guttmacher Institute (2015b) State policies in brief: An overview of abortion laws, New York: Guttmacher Institute.
17.
Guttmacher Institute (2016) State funding of abortion under Medicaid, New York: Guttmacher Institute.
18.
HenshawS.JoyceT.DennisA.FinerL.BlanchardK. (2009) Restrictions on Medicaid funding for abortions: A literature review, New York: Guttmacher Institute.
19.
HenshawS.KostK. (1992) Parental involvement in minors' abortion. Family Planning Perspectives24: 196–207.
20.
Ipas & Ibis Reproductive Health (2015) U.S. funding for abortion: How the Helms and Hyde amendments harm women and providers, Chapel Hill: Ipas.
21.
JoffeC. (1995) Doctors of conscience, Boston: Beacon Press.
22.
JonesR.FinerL.SinghS. (2010) Characteristics of US abortion patients, 2008, New York: Guttmacher Institute.
23.
JonesR.JermanJ. (2013) How far did US women travel for abortion services in 2008?Journal of Women's Health22: 706–713.
24.
JonesR.JermanJ. (2014) Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health46: 3–14.
25.
JonesR.KooistraK. (2011) Abortion incidence and access to services in the United States, 2008. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health43: 41–50.
26.
KaplanL. (1995) The story of Jane: The legendary underground feminist abortion service, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
KavanaughM.BessettD.LittmanL.NorrisA. (2013) Connecting knowledge about abortion and sexual reproductive health to belief about abortion restrictions: Findings from an online survey. Women's Health Issues23: 239–247.
KirkhamJ. (2013) Constructions of childhood, victimhood and abortion in Romania: The ‘Little-Girl Mother’. The Anthropology of East Europe Review31: 93–109.
30.
KnightP. (1977) Women and abortion in Victorian and Edwardian England. History Workshop4: 57–68.
31.
KumarA.HessiniL.MitchellE. (2009) Conceptualising abortion stigma. Culture, Health & Sexuality11: 625–639.
32.
LapanskyC.SchuhJ.CodyM.WoodleyP.BuffingtonS. (2010) Evaluating the “Baby Jack” storyline on “The Bold and the Beautiful”: Making a case for bone marrow donations. Cases in Public Health Communication & Marketing4: 8–27.
33.
LaraD.HoltK.PenaM.GrossmanD. (2015) Knowledge of abortion laws and services among low-income women in three United States cities. Journal of Immigrant Minority Health17: 1811–1818.
34.
MorganS.MoviusL.CodyM. (2009) The power of narratives: The effect of organ donation entertainment television storylines on the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of donors and non-donors. Journal of Communication59: 135–151.
NorrisA.BessettD.SteinbergJ.KavanaughM.De ZordoS.BeckerD. (2011) Abortion stigma: A reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences. Women's Health Issues21: S49–S54.
37.
O'NeilM. (2013) Selfish, vengeful, and full of spite: The representations of women who have abortions on Turkish television. Feminist Media Studies13: 810–818.
38.
PressA.ColeE. (1999) Speaking of abortion: Television and authority in the lives of women, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
PurcellC.HiltonS.McDaidL. (2014) The stigmatisation of abortion: A qualitative analysis of print media in Great Britain in 2010. Culture, Health & Sexuality16: 1141–1155.
40.
RalphL.GouldH.BakerA.FosterD. (2014) The role of parents and partners in minors' decisions to have an abortion and anticipated coping after abortion. Journal of Adolescent Health54: 428–434.
41.
RobertsS.FuentesL.KrizR.WilliamsV.UpadhyayU. (2015) Implications for women of Louisiana’s law requiring abortion providers to have hospital admitting privileges. Contraception91: 368–372.
42.
RobertsS.GouldH.KimportK.WeitzT.FosterD. (2013) Out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage for abortion in the United States. Women's Health Issues24: 211–218.
43.
RoccaC.KimportK.GouldH.FosterD. (2013) Women's emotions one week after receiving or being denied an abortion in the United States. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health45: 122–131.
44.
Rosenthal, E., Buffington, S. C., & Cole, G. (2013). Covering cancer: Examining the incidence and impact of prime time television cancer storylines. Paper presented at the National Conference on Health Communications, Marketing, & Media, Atlanta, GA.
45.
SissonG.KimportK. (2014) Telling stories about abortion: Abortion-related plots in American film and television, 1916–2013. Contraception89: 413–418.
46.
Sisson, G., & Kimport, K. (2015). Facts and fictions: Characters seeking abortion on American television, 2005–2014. Contraception, 446–451.
47.
Sisson, G., & Kimport, K. (2016). Doctors and witches, conscience and violence: Abortion provision on American Television, 2005–2014. Perspectives in Sexual and Reproductive Health. Epub ahead of print. DOI 10.1363/psrh.1367.
48.
SolingerR. (1994) The abortionist: A woman against the law, New York: Free Press.
49.
SolingerR. (2005) Pregnancy and power: A short history of reproductive politics in America, New York: New York University Press.
50.
SufrinC.Kolbi-MolinasA.RothR. (2015) Reproductive justice, health disparities and incarcerated women. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health47: 213–219.
51.
Texas Policy Evaluation Project (2015) Texas women's experiences attempting self-induced abortion in the face of dwindling options, Austin, TX: University of Texas and Ibis Reproductive Health.
52.
TurowJ. (2010) Playing doctor: Television, storytelling, and medical power, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
53.
White, K., Potter, J., Stevenson, A., Fuentes, L., & Grossman, D. (2015). Women's knowledge of and support for abortion restrictions in Texas: Findings from a statewide representative survey. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 48. Epub ahead of print. DOI 10.1363/48e8716.
54.
WhittierD.KennedyM.SeeleyS.St. LawrenceJ.BeckV. (2005) Embedding health messages into entertainment television: Effect on gay men's response to a syphilis outbreak. Journal of Health Communication10: 251–259.
