Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

While in general agreement with Michell's (2003) observations, arguments and positions, I believe two considerations might help to contextualize his piece further. First, it is important to note just how widespread have been psychologists' misunderstandings of positions and arguments in the philosophy of science, and what this says about the disciplinary isolation of psychology. Secondly, despite some common misunderstandings amongst qualitative researchers in psychology, there are good reasons for psychologists to resist both the quantitative imperative and the positivists' overly narrow construal of philosophy of science. These reasons relate to important, non-quantifiable characteristics of many psychological phenomena. Nonetheless, Michell's article is a timely reminder to guard against the excesses and limitations that attend any version of `methodolatry', quantitative or qualitative.

Keywords

philosophy positivism psychology quantification science

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cushman, P. (1995). Constructing the self constructing America: A cultural history of psychotherapy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychotherapy found its language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fay, B. (1996). Contemporary philosophy of social science: A multicultural approach. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hempel, C.B. (1979). Scientific rationality: Analytic vs. pragmatic perspectives. In T.F. Geraets (Ed.), Rationality to-day (pp. 292-304). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

Koch, S. (1992). Psychology's Bridgman vs. Bridgman's Bridgman. Theory & Psychology, 2, 261-290.

Martin, J. (1996). The `top ten' problems of psychology. History and Philosophy of Psychology Bulletin, 8(1), 4-10.

Michell, J. (2003). The quantitative imperative: Positivism, naive realism and the place of qualitative methods in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 13, 5-31.