In this paper, psychoanalysis and humanistic psychology are treated as exemplars that demonstrate the salience of social factors in the constitution of the discipline of psychology. There have been a number of efforts that have addressed this impertinent social factor that compromises psychology's claim to being a sort of natural science. Within the current climate of alternative positions in the discipline, it is often assumed that psychology can be absorbed into historical formations, as in social constructionist critique, science studies and the endorsement of indigenous psychologies. Within contemporary mainstream psychology, other disciplines (such as biology) seem to give warrant to psychology's cherished claim to objectivity. Drawing on theories in which psychologists addressed subjectivity, the paper examines psychoanalysis and humanistic psychology to see how each attempts to articulate its disciplinary basis. In this paper, I attempt to understand how the respective theories attempt to account for and finesse the inherent sociality of the psychological dimension. In the case of psychoanalysis, the basic reference point is Lacanian psychoanalysis. In the case of humanistic psychology, the concepts of potential and experience are interrogated to better understand their ethical and ontological function within a humanistic understanding of subjectivity. It is asserted that humanistic psychology may need to extend its basic precepts beyond its current appropriation of phenomenology in order to more fully understand the question of the subjective dimension in its relationship to its social foundations.
Allport, G. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
2.
Althusser, L. (1996). Writings on psychoanalysis: Freud and Lacan (J. Mehlman, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press .
3.
Apollon, W. (2002). From symptom to fantasy. In K. Malone & R. Hughes (Eds.), After Lacan: Clinical practice and the subject of the unconscious. (pp. 127—141). New York: State University of New York Press .
4.
Barratt, B. (1993). Psychoanalysis and the postmodern impulse. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press .
5.
Bateson, G. , Jackson, D. , Haley, J. , & Weakland, J. (1956). Toward a theory of schizophrenia . Behavioral Science, 1, 251—264 .
6.
Bambach, D. (1993). Being language: The spoken rituals of subjectivity . Unpublished master's thesis, West Georgia College, Carrollton, GA.
7.
Bayer, B. , & Malone, K. (1996). Feminism, psychology and matters of the body. Theory &Psychology, 6, 667—692 .
8.
Berlant, L. , & Warner, M. (1998). Sex in public . Critical Inquiry , 24, 547—566 .
9.
Bhabha, H.K. (2000). Are you a man or a mouse? In A. Tripp (Ed.), Gender (pp.99—108). New York: Palgrave . (Original work published 1995.)
10.
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect . American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52, 664—678 .
11.
Buss, A. (1979). Humanistic psychology as liberal ideology . Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 19, 43—55 .
12.
Butler, J. (1996). Excitable speech: Contemporary scenes of politics . New York: Routledge .
13.
Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
14.
Canguilhem, G. (1995). What is psychology ? The School Field, 6, 3—20 . (Original work published 1968.)
15.
Cleary, R. (1999). Bowlby's theory of attachment and loss: A feminist re-consideration . Feminism & Psychology, 9, 32—42 .
16.
Dean, T. (2000). Beyond sexualities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
17.
De Lauretis, T. (1998). The stubborn drive . Critical Inquiry , 24, 851—877 .
18.
Demos, J. (1997). Oedipus and America: Historical perspectives on the reception of psychoanalysis in the United States. In J. Pfister & N. Schnog (Eds.), Inventing the psychological (pp. 63—79). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press . (Original work published 1978.)
19.
Domenici, T. , & Lesser, R. (1995). Disorienting sexuality: Psychoanalytic reappraisals of sexual identities. New York: Routledge .
20.
Evans, D. (1998). From Kantian ethics to mystical experience: An exploration of jouissance. In D. Nobus (Ed.), Key concepts in Lacanian psychoanalysis (pp. 1—28). London: Rebus .
21.
Fink, B. (1995). The Lacanian subject: Between language and jouissance . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
22.
Foucault, M. (1999). About the beginnings of the hermeneutics of the self. In J. Carrette (Ed.), Religion and culture (pp. 158—181). New York: Routledge . (Original work published 1993.)
23.
Freud, S. (1950). Constructions in analysis. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), Collected papers of Sigmund Freud (Vol. V, pp. 358—371). London: Hogarth . (Original work published 1937.)
24.
Freud, S. (1969). Postscript. In J . Stratchey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. XX, pp. 87—96). New York: Norton . (Original work published 1927.)
25.
Gergen, K. (1973). Social psychology as history . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309—320 .
26.
Haaken, J. (1998). Pillar of salt: Gender, memory, and the perils of looking back. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press .
27.
Hacking, I. (1992). Making up people. In E. Stein (Ed.), Forms of desire (pp. 69—88). New York: Routledge . (Original work published 1986.)
28.
Hacking, I. (1995). Re-writing the soul. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
29.
Halling, S. , & Nill, J.D. (1995). A brief history of existential-phenomenological psychiatry and psychotherapy . Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 26, 1—45 .
30.
Herman, E. (1992). Being and doing: Humanistic psychology and the spirit of the 1960s. In B. Tischler (Ed.), Sights on the sixties (pp. 87—101). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press .
31.
Herman, E. (1995). The romance of America psychology. Berkeley: University of California Press .
32.
Hill, P. (2002). Introduction to Lacanian clinical practices. London: Press for the Habilitation of Psychoanalysis .
33.
Hook, D. (2003). Analogues of power: Reading psychotherapy through the sovereignty—discipline—government complex . Theory & Psychology, 13, 605—628 .
34.
Jacoby, R. (1975). Social amnesia: A critique of conformist psychology . Boston, MA : Beacon .
35.
Lacan, J. (1969—70). Book XVII: The seminar of Jacques Lacan: The other side of psychoanalysis. (R. Grigg, Trans.). Unpublished manuscript.
36.
Lacan, J. (1981). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Norton . (Original work published 1973.)
37.
Lacan, J. (1988). The seminar, Book I: Freud's papers on technique, 1953—1954 ( J. Miller , Ed.; J. Forrester, Trans.). New York: Norton . (Original work 1953—4.)
38.
Lacan, J. (1998) On feminine sexuality: The limits of love and knowledge (B. Fink, Trans.). New York: Norton . (Original work published 1975.)
39.
Lacan, J. (2002). The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis. In Écrits: A selection. (B. Fink, Trans.' pp. 31—106). New York: Norton . (Original work published 1956).
40.
Leclaire, S. (1998). A child is being killed: On primary narcissism and the death drive (M.-C. Hayes, Trans.). Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press . (Original work published 1975.)
41.
Lesser, R. , & Schoenberg, E. (1999). That obscure subject of desire: Freud's female homosexual revisited. New York: Routledge .
42.
Levine, R. (1973). Culture, behavior, and personality. Chicago, IL: Aldine .
43.
Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
44.
Lonner, W. , & Malpass, R. (1994). Psychology and culture. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon .
45.
Malone, K. (1995). The place of the other: A Lacanian challenge to humanistic psychology . The Humanistic Psychologist, 23, 48—62 .
46.
Malone, K. , & Bohnet, C. (2003, August). Political souls . Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association , Toronto, Canada.
47.
Martin, J. (1998). Methodological essentialism, false differences, and other dangerous traps. In B. McClinchy & J. Norem (Eds.), The gender and psychology reader (pp. 10—33). New York : New York University Press . (Original work published 1994.)
48.
Maslow, A. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York: Wiley .
49.
Miller, J.-A. (1996). An introduction to Seminars I and II. In R. Feldstein , B. Fink , & M. Jaanus (Eds.), Reading Seminars I and II (pp. 3—38). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press .
Milner, J. (1991). Lacan and the ideal of science. In A. Lepin (Ed.), Lacan and the human sciences (pp.27—42). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press .
52.
Misra, G. , & Gergen, K. (1993). On the place of culture in psychological science . International Journal of Psychology, 28, 225—243 .
53.
Morawski, J. (1992). The measurement of masculinity and femininity: Engendering categorical realities. In J. Bohan (Ed), Seldom seen, rarely heard: Women's place in psychology (pp. 199—226). Boulder, CO: Westview . (Original work published 1985.)
54.
Morawski, J. (1994). Practicing feminisms, reconstructing psychology . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press .
55.
Nobus, D. (2000). Jacques Lacan and the Freudian practice of psychoanalysis . New York: Routledge .
56.
Pfister, J. (1997). Glamorizing the psychological: The politics of performances of modern psychological identities. In J. Pfister & N. Schnog (Eds.), Inventing the psychological: Toward a cultural history of emotional life in America (pp. 167—216). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
57.
Reich, W. (1960). Wilhelm Reich: Selected writings. New York: Noonday .
58.
Riebel, L. (1982). Humanistic psychology: How realistic ? Small Group Behavior, 13, 349—371 .
59.
Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy . Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin .
60.
Rose, J. (2000). Just, lasting, and comprehensive. In A. Elliot (Ed.), Freud 2000 (pp. 38—60). New York: Routledge . (Original work published 1996.)
61.
Samuels, R. (1993). Between philosophy and psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge .
62.
Scott, J. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis . American Historical Review, 91, 1053—75 .
63.
Seligman, M.E.P. ,. & Csikszentmihályi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction . American Psychologist, 55, 5—14 .
64.
Shepardson, C. (2000). Vital signs. New York: Routledge .
65.
Shore, B. (1996). Culture in mind. New York: Oxford University Press .
66.
Soler, C. (1996). The body in the teaching of Jacques Lacan . Journal of the Centre for Freudian Analysis and Research, 6, 6—38 .
67.
Squire, C. (1990). Crisis what crisis? Discourses and narratives of the `social in social psychology'. In I . Parker & J. Shotter (Eds.), Deconstructing social psychology (pp. 33—46). London : Routledge .
68.
Stein, E. (1992). Forms of desire: Sexual orientation and the social constructionist controversy. New York: Routledge .
69.
Tiefer, L. (1995). Sex is not a natural act and other essays. Boulder, CO: Westview .
70.
Tomasello, M. (2003). The key is social cognition . In D. Getner & S. Goldion-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 47—57 ). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
71.
Verhaeghe, P. (1997). Does woman exist? (M. Ry, Trans.). London: Rebus . (Original work published 1996.)
72.
Verhaeghe, P. (2006). Enjoyment and impossibility: Lacan's revision of the Oedipus complex. In J. Clemens & R. Grigg (Eds.), Jacques Lacan and the other side of psychoanalysis. (pp. 29—49). Durham, NC: Duke University Press .
73.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press . (Original work published 1930.)
74.
Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso .
75.
Zupančič, A. (2000). Ethics of the real: Kant, LacanLondon: Verso .
