The paper attempts to overcome an abstract juxtaposition of human beings and technology and to develop an understanding of the technological mediation of human subjectivity and the inner relation between sociability and materiality. In contrast to the widespread notion of technological products being unproblematic means to an end, solely expanding human agency and disposition over the world, the argumentation puts the case for an understanding of technology as materialized action and contradictory forms of life. Taking this as a basis, the paper identifies in reference to Critical Psychology as well as theories from the field of science and technology studies different dimensions of the ambivalence of technology and its meaning in human life. Furthermore the paper develops suggestions of how psychological theory might contribute to a critical social study of technology.
Akrich, M., & Latour, B. (1997). A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies. In W.E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 259-264). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
Anders, G. (1989). Sprache und Endzeit (V): Aus dem Manuskript zum dritten Band der "Antiquiertheit des Menschen" [Language and the end of time (V): From the manuscript to the third volume of the "Antiquatedness of human beings"]. Forum, 36(432), 62-67.
3.
Anders, G. (1992). Die Antiquiertheit des Proletariats [The antiquatedness of the proletariat]. Forum, 39(462-464), 7-11.
4.
Anders, G. (2002a). Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen: Band 1. Über die Seele im Zeitalter der zweiten industriellen Revolution [The antiquatedness of human beings: Vol. 1. The soul in the age of the second industrial revolution] . Munich, Germany: Beck.
5.
Anders, G. (2002b). Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen: Band 2. Über die Zerstörung des Lebens im Zeitalter der dritten industriellen Revolution [The antiquatedness of human beings: Vol. 2. The destruction of life in the age of the third industrial revolution]. Munich, Germany: Beck.
6.
Axel, E. (2002). Regulation as productive tool use: Participatory observation in the control room of a district heating system. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Roskilde University Press.
7.
Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1992). Don't throw the baby out with the bath school! A reply to Collins and Yearly. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 343-368). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Costall, A. (1995). Socializing affordances. Theory & Psychology, 5, 467-481.
10.
Costall, A., & Dreier, O. (Eds.). (2006). Doing things with things: The design and use of everyday objects. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
11.
Dreier, O. (2008). Psychotherapy in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Gergen, K.J. (2000). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.
14.
Gergen, K.J. (2001). Technology, self, and the moral project. In Social construction in context (pp. 184-197). London: Sage.
15.
Gergen, K.J. (2002). The challenge of absent presence. In J.E. Katz & M.A. Aakhus (Eds.) Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 227-241). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
17.
Holzkamp, K. (1978). Sinnliche Erkenntnis: Historischer Ursprung und gesellschaftliche Funktion der Wahrnehmung [Sensory knowledge: Historical origin and societal function of perception]. Königstein /Ts, Germany: Athenäum.
18.
Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie [Foundation of psychology] . Frankfurt/M., Germany: Campus .
19.
Holzkamp, K. (1986). Handeln [Act]. In G. Rexilius & S. Grubitzsch (Eds.), Psychologie. Theorien-Methoden-Arbeitsfelder: Ein Grundkurs (pp. 381-402). Reinbek, Germany: Rowohlt.
20.
Holzkamp, K. (1989). Die "kognitive Wende" in der Psychologie zwischen neuer Sprachmode und wissenschaftlicher Neuorientierung [The "cognitive turn" in psychology between new language style and scientific reorientation]. Forum Kritische Psychologie, 23, 67-85.
21.
Holzkamp, K. (1991). Was heißt "Psychologie vom Subjektstandpunkt"? Überlegungen zu subjektwissenschaftlicher Theorienbildung [What could a "psychology from the standpoint of the subject" be? Reflections on subject-scientific theory formation]. Forum Kritische Psychologie, 28, 5-19.
22.
Holzkamp, K. (1996). Psychologie: Verständigung über Handlungsbegründungen alltäglicher Lebensführung [Psychology: Social self-understanding and conduct of everyday life]. Forum Kritische Psychologie, 36, 7-112.
Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35, 441-456.
25.
Kvale, S. (1973). The technological paradigm of psychological research . Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 3, 143-159.
26.
Kvale, S. (1976). The psychology of learning as ideology and technology . Behaviorism, 4, 97-116.
27.
Latour, B. (1997). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W.E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225-258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory . New York: Oxford University Press .
29.
Leont'ev, A.N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind (M. Kopylova, Trans.). Moscow: Progress. (Original work published 1959)
30.
Papadopoulos, D., Stephenson, N., & Tsianos, V. (2008). Escape! Power and revolt in the 21st Century. London: Pluto.
31.
Parker, I., & Gordo-Lopez, A.J. (Eds.). (1999). Cyberpsychology. London: Routledge.
32.
Rammert, W. (2007). Technik-Handeln-Wissen: Zu einer pragmatischen Technik-und Sozialtheorie [Technology-action-knowledge: Towards a pragmatic technology and social theory]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
33.
Rose, N. (1998). Inventing ourselves: Psychology, power, and personhood . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Scarry, E. (1985). The body in pain: The making and unmaking of the world. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Schraube, E. (1998). Auf den Spuren der Dinge: Psychologie in einer Welt der Technik [On the track of things: Psychology in a world of technology] . Hamburg, Germany: Argument.
36.
Schraube, E. (2003). The politics of techknowledge. An experimental moment in psychology. In N. Stephenson, H.L. Radtke, R. Jorna , & H.J. Stam (Eds.), Theoretical psychology: Critical contributions (pp. 39-45). Toronto , Canada: Captus University Publications.
37.
Schraube, E. (2005a). "Torturing things until they confess": Günther Anders' critique of technology. Science as Culture, 14, 77-85.
38.
Schraube, E. (2005b). Psychological study of science and technology . In S. Restivo (Ed.), Science, technology, and society: An encyclopedia (pp. 424-430). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39.
Skinner, B.F. (2005). Walden Two. Indianapolis, IN : Hackett. (Original work published 1948)
40.
Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Stam, H.J. (1999). Technologies "R" us: Psychology and the production of new bodies. In W. Maiers, B. Bayer, B. Esgalhado , R. Jorna, & E. Schraube (Eds.), Challenges to theoretical psychology (pp. 332-340). Toronto, Canada: Captus University Publications.
42.
Staeuble, I. (1985). "Subjektpsychologie" oder "subjektlose Psychologie"? Gesellschaftliche und institutionelle Bedingungen der Herausbildung der modernen Psychologie ["Subject psychology" or "subjectless psychology"? Social and institutional conditions of the development of modern psychology]. In M.G. Ash & U. Geuter (Eds.), Geschichte der deutschen Psychologie im 20. Jahrhundert. Ein Überblick (pp. 19-44). Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
43.
Stern, W. (1900). Die psychologische Arbeit des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts, insbesondere in Deutschland [The psychological work of the nineteenth century, in particular in Germany]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie und Pathologie, 2, 413-436.
44.
Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit . New York: Simon & Schuster .
45.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
46.
Turkle, S. (Ed.). (2007). Evocative objects: Things we think with. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
Walkerdine, V. (2007). Children, gender, video games: Towards a relational approach to multi-media. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
48.
Wartofsky, M.W. (1979). Models: Representation and the scientific understanding . Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel .
49.
Winner, L. (1989). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
Winner, L. (1992). Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51.
Zahavi, D. (2005). Subjectivity and selfhood: Investigating the first-person perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
