In this riposte it will be argued that the critique by Peters (2013) of the theoretical foundation of evolutionary psychology misses the mark, and, in the process, unfortunately repeats many common and egregious misunderstandings. This reply will attempt to outline the real position of evolutionary psychologists with respect to modularity and the development, flexibility, and learning capacities of cognitive adaptations. In particular, evolutionary psychologists’ concept of the developmental target of naturally selected design will be made salient. I also aim to provide a more accurate treatment of the neurobiological and genomic issues at stake. In sum, it will be shown that Peters’ rendering of the theoretical foundation of evolutionary psychology is a straw man representation and that the real position of evolutionary psychologists is far more interesting once some of the nuances of their theoretical foundation are brought to light.
AriewA. (1999). Innateness is canalization: In defense of a developmental account of innateness. In HardcastleV. G. (Ed.), Where biology meets psychology: Philosophical essays (pp. 117–138). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
BarrettC. H. (2006). Modularity and design reincarnation. In CarruthersP.LaurenceS.StichS. (Eds.), The innate mind: Vol. 2. Culture and cognition (pp. 199–217). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3.
BarrettC. H. (2007). Development as the target of evolution: A computational approach to developmental systems. In GangestadS. W.SimpsonJ. A. (Eds.), The evolution of mind: Fundamental questions and controversies (pp. 186–192). New York, NY: Guilford.
4.
BarrettC. H.KurzbanR. (2006). Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review, 113, 628–647.
5.
BoydR.RichersonP. J. (2006). Culture, adaptation, and innateness. In CarruthersP.StitchS.LaurenceS. (Eds.), The innate mind: Vol. 2. Culture and cognition (pp. 23–38). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
BullerD. J. (2005). Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
BussD. M. (Ed.). (2005). The handbook of evolutionary psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
8.
BussD. M. (2008). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
9.
BussD. M.HaseltonM. G.ShackelfordT. K.BleskeA. L.WakefieldJ. C. (1998). Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. American Psychologist, 53, 533–548.
10.
CarruthersP. (2006). The architecture of the mind: Massive modularity and the flexibility of thought. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
ChengZ.VentureM.SheX. W.KhaitovichP.GravesT.OsoegawaK.. . . EichlerE. E. (2005). A genome-wide comparison of recent chimpanzee and human segmental duplications. Nature, 437, 88–93.
12.
Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium. (2005). Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature, 437, 69–87.
13.
CollinsF. S.McKusickV. A. (2001). Implications of the Human Genome Project for medical science. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 540–544.
14.
ConferJ. C.EastonJ. A.FleischmanC. G.LewisD. G.PerillouxC.BussD. M. (2010). Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist, 65, 110–126.
15.
DennettD. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
16.
EbersbergerI.MetzlerD.SchwarzC.PääboS. (2002). Genomewide comparison of DNA sequences between humans and chimpanzees. American Journal of Human Genetics, 70, 1490–1497.
17.
GallistelR. (2000). The replacement of general-purpose learning models with adaptively specialized learning modules. In GazzanigaM. (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences II (pp. 1179–1192). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
GallistelR.GibbonJ. (2001). Time, rate and conditioning. Psychological Review, 108, 289–344.
19.
GallistelR.MarkT.KingA.LathamP. (2001). The rat approximates an ideal detector of rates of reward: Implications for the law of effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 354–372.
20.
GangestadS. W.HaseltonM. G.BussD. M. (2006). Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: Evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 75–95.
21.
GangestadS. W.SimpsonJ. A. (2000). Trade-offs, the allocation of reproductive effort, and the evolutionary psychology of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 624–644.
22.
GearyD. C. (2005). The origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23.
GoldbergT. E.WeinbergerD. R. (Eds.). (2009). The genetics of cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
GriffithsP. E.MacheryE. (2008). Innateness, canalization, and “biologicizing the mind”. Philosophical Psychology, 21, 395–412.
25.
HaigB. D.DurrantR. (2002). Adaptationism and inference to the best explanation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 520–521.
26.
HeissigF.KrauseJ.BrykJ.KhaitovichP.EnardW.PääboS. (2005). Functional analysis of human and chimpanzee promoters. Genome Biology, 6(7), R57.
27.
HenrichJ.McElreathR. (2007). Dual inheritance theory: The evolution of human cultural capacities and cultural evolution. In DunbarR.BarrettL. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 555–570). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
KanazawaS. (2004). The savanna principle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 25, 41–54.
29.
KhaitovichP.HellmanI.EnardW.NowickK.LeinweberM.FranzH.. . . PääboS. (2005). Parallel patterns of evolution in the genomes and transcriptomes of humans and chimpanzees. Science, 309, 1850–1854.
30.
LiptonP. (2008). Inference to the best explanation. In PsillosS.CurdM. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to the philosophy of science (pp. 193–202). New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
MacheryE.BarrettC. H. (2006). Essay review: Debunking adapting minds. Philosophy of Science, 73, 232–246.
32.
MarcusG.F. (2004). The birth of the mind: How a tiny number of genes creates the complexities of human thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
33.
MarcusG. F.RabagliatiH. (2006). Genes and domain specificity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 397–398.
34.
MeunierD.LambiotteR.BullmoreE. T. (2010). Modular and hierarchically modular organization of brain networks. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 4, 1–11.
35.
MeunierD.LambiotteR.FomitoA.ErscheK. D.BullmoreE. T. (2009). Hierarchical modularity in human brain functional networks. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 3, 1–12.
36.
MillerG. (2008). Mating intelligence: Frequently asked questions. In GeherG.MillerG. (Eds.), Mating intelligence: Sex, relationships, and the mind’s reproductive system (pp. 173–192). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
37.
Ochoa-EspinosaA.SmallS. (2006). Developmental mechanisms and cis-regulatory codes. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 16, 165–170.
38.
OlsonM. V.VarkiA. (2003). Sequencing the chimpanzee genome: Insights into human evolution and disease. Nature Reviews Genetics, 4, 20–28.
39.
OyamaS.GriffithsP. E.GrayD. R. (Eds.). (2001). Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
PetersB. M. (2013). Evolutionary psychology: Neglecting neurobiology in defining the mind. Theory & Psychology, 23, 305–322.
41.
PiazzaM.DehaeneS. (2004). From number neurons to mental arithmetic: The cognitive neuroscience of number sense. In GazzanigaM. S. (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences III (pp. 865–876). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
PigliucciM.MüllerG. B. (Eds.). (2010). Evolution—The extended synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
PinkerS. (1997). How the mind works. New York, NY: Norton.
44.
PlatekS. M.KeenanJ. P.ShackelfordT. K. (Eds.). (2007). Evolutionary cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
PlatekS. M.ShackelfordT. K. (Eds.). (2009). Foundations in evolutionary cognitive neuroscience. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
46.
PlotkinH. C. (1998). Evolution in mind: An introduction to evolutionary psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
PsillosS. (2002). Simply the best: A case for abduction. In KakasA. C.SadriF. (Eds.), Computational logic: Logic programming and beyond (pp. 605–625). New York, NY: Springer.
48.
PtakS. E.HindsD. A.KoehlerK.NickelB.PatilN.BallingerD. G.. . . PääboS. (2005). Fine-scale recombination patterns differ between chimpanzees and humans. Nature Genetics, 37, 429–434.
49.
RamachandranV. S.BlakesleeS. (1998). Phantoms in the brain: Probing the mysteries of the human mind. New York, NY: William Morrow.
50.
RamusF. (2006). Genes, brain, and cognition: A roadmap for the cognitive scientist. Cognition, 101, 247–269.
51.
SalmonW. C. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
SchmittD. P.PilcherJ. J. (2004). Evaluating evidence of psychological adaptation: How do we know one when we see one?Psychological Science, 15, 643–649.
SterelnyK.KitcherP. (1988). The return of the gene. The Journal of Philosophy, 85, 339–361.
55.
ThagardP. (1978). The best explanation: Criteria for theory choice. Journal of Philosophy, 75, 76–92.
56.
ToobyJ. (2001). Is human nature hidden in the genome?Nature Genetics, 29, 363.
57.
ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In BarkowJ. H.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
58.
ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (2000). Toward mapping the evolved functional organization of mind and brain. In GazzanigaM. S. (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences II (pp. 1167–1178). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59.
ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (2005). Conceptual foundations of evolutionary psychology. In BussD. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 5–67). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
60.
ToobyJ.CosmidesL.BarrettC. H. (2003). The second law of thermodynamics is the first law of psychology: Evolutionary developmental psychology and the theory of tandem, coordinated inheritances: Comment on Lickliter and Honeycutt (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 858–865.
61.
VerhageM.MaiaA. S.PlompJ. J.BrussardA. B.HeeromaJ. H.VermeerH.. . . SüdhofT. C. (2000). Synaptic assembly of the brain in the absence of neurotransmitter secretion. Science, 287, 864–869.
62.
WaddingtonC. H. (1959). Canalisation of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature, 183, 1654–1655.
