Jean Piaget’s research program—which involved the study of child development as a central feature (viz. “stages”), but which can be understood more broadly as advancing a constructive theory of knowledge (i.e., “genetic epistemology”)—is thought by many contemporary developmentalists to have been guided by a coherent, complete, and unchanging meta-theoretical framework: “equilibration.” While this is correct philosophically, it is incorrect historically. Briefly put: the formal meaning of equilibration changed over time, and thus so too did the entirety of the theory that relied upon it. To focus in on one specific change of particular importance, this article examines how Piaget appealed to the changing ideas of Kurt Gödel and their interpretations by French-speaking logicians. This historical analysis (a Foucauldian archaeology) thereby excavates a “neo-Gödelian turn” in Piaget’s research program. The resulting framework is then sketched in outline: the updated formal meta-theory that made possible “Piaget’s new theory.”
ApostelL.MandelbrotB.PiagetJ. (1957). Logique et équilibre [Logic and equilibrium]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
2.
AvigadJ.FefermanS. (1995). Gödel’s functional (“Dialectica”) interpretation. In BussS. R. (Ed.), Handbook of proof theory (pp. 337–406). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
3.
BeilinH. (1992). Piaget’s new theory. In BeilinH.PufallP. B. (Eds.), Piaget’s theory (pp. 1–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
BethE. W. (1950). À propos d’un traité de logique [On the subject of a treaty of logic]. Methodos, 2, 258–264.
5.
BethE. W. (1959). The foundations of mathematics. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland.
6.
BethE. W. (1960, 14July). Letter regarding the draft of Mathematical Epistemology and Psychology, discussing the introduction, conclusion, and various suggested corrections. PiagetVillabureauJPpetite armoireI (en haut; A-1.974, Carton 4/DFP). Archives Jean Piaget, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
7.
BethE. W.PiagetJ. (1966). Mathematical epistemology and psychology (MaysW., Trans.). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: D. Reidel. (Original work published 1961)
8.
BodenM. A. (2006). Mind as machine: A history of cognitive science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
BondT. G.TryphonA. (2009). Piaget and method. In MüllerU.CarpendaleJ. I. M.SmithL. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Piaget (pp. 171–199). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BrownT. (2001). Bärbel Inhelder and the fall of Valhalla. In TryphonA.VonècheJ. (Eds.), Working with Piaget (pp. 179–191). Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
11.
BurmanJ. T. (2012). Jean Piaget: Images of a life and his factory. History of Psychology, 15(3), 283–288. doi: 10.1037/a0025930
12.
BurmanJ. T. (2013a). Profiles of international archives: Les Archives Jean Piaget, University of Geneva, Switzerland. History of Psychology, 16(2), 158–161. doi: 10.1037/a0031405
13.
BurmanJ. T. (2013b). Updating the Baldwin effect: The biological levels behind Piaget’s new theory. New Ideas in Psychology, 31(3), 363–373. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2012.07.003
14.
BurmanJ. T. (2015). Neglect of the foreign invisible: Historiography and the navigation of conflicting sensibilities. History of Psychology, 18(2), 146–169. doi: 10.1037/a0039194
15.
CampbellR. L. (2009). Constructive processes: Abstraction, generalization, and dialectics. In MüllerU.CarpendaleJ. I. M.SmithL. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Piaget (pp. 150–170). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
ChapmanM. (1988). Constructive evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
DavisM. (2005). What did Gödel believe and when did he believe it?Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 11(2), 194–206.
18.
DawsonJ. W.Jr. (1997). Logical dilemmas: The life and work of Kurt Gödel. Wellesley, MA: A. K. Peters.
19.
DucretJ.-J. (1984). Jean Piaget savant et philosophe [Jean Piaget thinker and philosopher] (Vol. 1 & 2). Genève, Switzerland: Librairie Droz.
20.
DucretJ.-J. (2000). Jean Piaget 1968–1979. Genève, Switzerland: Service de la Recherche en Education.
21.
EvansR. I. (1973). Jean Piaget (DuckworthE., Trans.). New York, NY: Dutton.
22.
FefermanS. (2008). Lieber Herr Bernays!, Lieber Herr Gödel!: Gödel on finitism, constructivity and Hilbert’s program. Dialectica, 62(2), 179–203.
23.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (Sheridan-SmithA. M., Trans.). London, UK: Routledge. (Original work published 1969)
24.
FranzénT. (2005). Gödel’s theorem. Wellesley, MA: A. K. Peters.
25.
GallagherJ. M. (1977). Piaget’s concept of equilibration: Biological, logical, and cybernetic roots. In AppelM. H.GoldbergL. S. (Eds.), Equilibration (pp. 21–32). New York, NY: Plenum. (Original work published 1972)
26.
GödelK. (1986a). On formally undecidable propositions of Principia mathematica and related systems I (van HeijenoortJ., Trans.). In FefermanS.DawsonJ. W.Jr.KleeneS. C.MooreG. H.SolovayR. M.HeijenoortJ. v. (Eds.), Kurt Gödel: Collected works (Vol. 1, pp. 145–195). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1931)
27.
GödelK. (1986b). On the completeness of the calculus of logic (Bauer-MengelbergS.van HeijenoortJ., Trans.). In FefermanS.DawsonJ. W.Jr.KleeneS. C.MooreG. H.SolovayR. M.HeijenoortJ. v. (Eds.), Kurt Gödel: Collected works (Vol. 1, pp. 61–101). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1929)
28.
GödelK. (1990a). Russell’s mathematical logic. In FefermanS.DawsonJ. W.Jr.KleeneS. C.MooreG. H.SolovayR. M.HeijenoortJ. v. (Eds.), Kurt Gödel: Collected works (Vol. 2, pp. 119–141). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1944)
29.
GödelK. (1990b). On a hitherto unutilized extension of the finitary standpoint (Bauer-MengelbergS.van HeijenoortJ., Trans.). In FefermanS.DawsonJ. W.Jr.KleeneS. C.MooreG. H.SolovayR. M.HeijenoortJ. v. (Eds.), Kurt Gödel: Collected works (Vol. 2, pp. 241–251). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1958)
30.
GödelK. (1995a). In what sense is intuitionistic logic constructive? In FefermanS.DawsonJ. W.Jr.GoldfarbW.ParsonsC.SolovayR. M. (Eds.), Kurt Gödel: Collected works (Vol. 3, pp. 189–200). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31.
GödelK. (1995b). The present situation in the foundation of mathematics. In FefermanS.DawsonJ. W.GoldfarbW.ParsonsC.SolovayR. M. (Eds.), Kurt Gödel: Collected works (Vol. 3, pp. 45–53). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
GouldS. J. (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.
33.
GuttingG. (1989). Michel Foucault’s archaeology of scientific reason. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
HeinzmannG.TrognonA.TremblayF. (2014). Correspondence between Evert Willem Beth and Jean Piaget (1951–1955). In RebuschiM.BattM.HeinzmannG.LihoreauF.MusiolM.TrognonA. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary works in logic, epistemology, psychology and linguistics (pp. 45–93). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
35.
HofstadterD. R. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach. New York, NY: Basic Books.
36.
KesselringT.MüllerU. (2011). The concept of egocentrism in the context of Piaget’s theory. New Ideas in Psychology, 29(3), 327–345. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.008
37.
LadrièreJ. (1960). Les limitations des formalismes et leur signification philosophique [The limitations of formalisms and their philosophical significance]. Dialectica, 14(4), 279–328.
38.
LadrièreJ. (1967). Les limites de la formalisation [The limits of formalism]. In PiagetJ. (Ed.), Logique et connaissance scientifique [Logic and scientific knowledge] (pp. 312–333). Paris, France: Gallimard.
39.
LadrièreJ. (1973). L’explication en logique [Explanation in logic]. In ApostelL.CellérierG.DesantiJ. T.GarciaR.GrangerG. G.HalbwachsF.Halbwachs. . . Sinclair de ZwaartH. (Eds.), L’explication dans les sciences [Explanation in the sciences] (pp. 19–56). Paris, France: Flammarion.
40.
LadrièreJ. (1981). La philosophie des mathématiques de Kurt Gödel [The philosophy of the mathematics of Kurt Gödel]. Epistemologia, 4(1), 287–311.
41.
MesserlyJ. G. (1996). Piaget’s conception of evolution. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
42.
MesserlyJ. G. (2009). Piaget’s biology. In MüllerU.CarpendaleJ. I. M.SmithL. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Piaget (pp. 94–109). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43.
MüllerU.BurmanJ. T.HutchinsonS. (2013). The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget: A quinquagenary retrospective. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(1), 52–55. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2012.10.001
44.
NagelE.NewmanJ. R. (1956). Godel’s proof. Scientific American, 194(6), 71–84, 86.
45.
NagelE.NewmanJ. R. (1958). Gödel’s proof. New York, NY: New York University Press.
46.
Perret-ClermontA.-N.BarreletJ.-M. (2008). Jean Piaget and Neuchâtel (RitchieM.SchragoK.JemielitlyD., Trans.). New York, NY: Psychology Press. (Original work published 1996)
47.
PiagetJ. (1925). Psychologie et critique de la connaissance [Psychology and critique of knowledge]. Archives de Psychologie, 19(75), 193–210.
48.
PiagetJ. (1942). Classes, relations et nombres [Class, relations and numbers]. Paris, France: Libraire Philosophique J. Vrin.
49.
PiagetJ. (1949). Traité de logique [Treaty of logic]. Paris, France: A. Colin.
50.
PiagetJ. (1950). Introduction à l’épistémologie génétique [Introduction to genetic epistemology]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
51.
PiagetJ. (1951). À propos d’un traité de logique: Réponse à M. E. W. Beth [On the subject of a treaty of logic: Response to M. E. W. Beth]. Methodos, 3, 243–244.
52.
PiagetJ. (1952a). Autobiography. In BoringE. G.WernerH.LangfeldH. S.YerkesR. M. (Eds.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 4., pp. 237–256). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
53.
PiagetJ. (1952b). Essai sur les transformations des opérations logiques [Essay on the transformations of operations of logic]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
54.
PiagetJ. (1953). Logic and psychology (MaysW.WhiteheadF., Trans.). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
55.
PiagetJ. (1962). Will and action (HartocollisP., Trans.). Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 26(3), 138–145.
56.
PiagetJ. (1963). Foreword. In FlavellJ. H., The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget (pp. vii–ix). New York, NY: Van Nostrand.
57.
PiagetJ. (1967a). Épistémologie de la logique [Epistemology of logic]. In Logique et connaissance scientifique [Logic and scientific knowledge] (pp. 375–399). Paris, France: Gallimard.
58.
PiagetJ. (Ed.). (1967b). Logique et connaissance scientifique [Logic and scientific knowledge]. Paris, France: Gallimard.
59.
PiagetJ. (1968). Le structuralisme [Structuralism]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
60.
PiagetJ. (1970a). General problems of interdisciplinary research and common mechanisms. In FriedmanS.BertrandA.HochfeldJ.MaheuR. (Eds.), Main trends of research in the social and human sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 467–528). Paris, France: Mouton/UNESCO.
61.
PiagetJ. (1970b). L’épistémologie génétique [Genetic epistemology]. Paris, France: Presses universitaires de France.
62.
PiagetJ. (1970c). Piaget’s theory (CellérierG.LangerJ., Trans.). In MussenP. H. (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 703–732). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. (Original work published 1968)
63.
PiagetJ. (1971a). Biology and knowledge (WalshB., Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1967)
64.
PiagetJ. (1971b). Classification of disciplines and interdisciplinary connections (RosinA., Trans.). In Psychology and epistemology (pp. 121–153). New York, NY: Viking. (Original work published 1964)
65.
PiagetJ. (1971c). Insights and illusions of philosophy (MaysW., Trans.). New York, NY: World Publishing. (Original work published 1965)
66.
PiagetJ. (1971d). Introduction à la seconde édition [Introduction to the second edition]. In GrizeJ.-B. (Ed.), Jean Piaget: Essai de logique opératoire [Jean Piaget: Essay on operational logic] (2nd ed., pp. xi–xvi). Paris, France: Dunod.
67.
PiagetJ. (1971e). Structuralism (MaschlerC., Trans.). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1968)
68.
PiagetJ. (1972). The principles of genetic epistemology (MaysW., Trans.). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1970)
69.
PiagetJ. (1973). Remarques finales [Final remarks]. In ApostelL.CellérierG.DesantiJ. T.GarciaR.GrangerG. G.HalbwachsF.… Sinclair de ZwaartH. (Eds.), L’explication dans les sciences [Explanation in the sciences] (pp. 215–232). Paris, France: Flammarion.
70.
PiagetJ. (1976). The affective unconscious and the cognitive unconscious (SinclairA., Trans.). In InhelderB.ChipmanH. H. (Eds.), Piaget and his school (pp. 63–71). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. (Original work published 1970)
71.
PiagetJ. (1977). Some recent research and its link with a new theory of groupings and conservations based on commutability (G. Voyat & D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 291, 350–358.
72.
PiagetJ. (1978). Success and understanding (PomeransA. J., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1974)
73.
PiagetJ. (1979). Behaviour and evolution (Nicholson-SmithD., Trans.). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1976)
74.
PiagetJ. (1980). Les formes élémentaires de la dialectique. Paris, France: Gallimard.
75.
PiagetJ. (1981). Intelligence and affectivity (BrownT. A.KaegiC. E., Trans.). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. (Original work published 1954)
76.
PiagetJ. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures (BrownT.ThampyK. J., Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1975)
77.
PiagetJ. (1986). Essay on necessity (L. Smith & F. Steel, Trans.). Human Development, 29(6), 301–314. doi: 10.1159/000273106 (Original work published 1977)
78.
PiagetJ. (1995a). Genetic logic and sociology (KitchenerR., Trans.). In SmithL. (Ed.), Jean Piaget: Sociological studies (pp. 184–214). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1928/1977)
79.
PiagetJ. (1995b). Sociological studies (SmithL., Ed. & Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1977)
80.
PiagetJ. (2001). Studies in reflecting abstraction (CampbellR. L., Trans.). Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis. (Original work published 1977)
81.
PiagetJ.DuckworthE. (1973). Piaget takes a teacher’s look. Learning: The Magazine for Creative Teaching, 2(2), 22–27.
82.
PiagetJ.GarciaR. (1989). Psychogenesis and the history of science (FeiderH., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1983)
83.
PiagetJ.GarciaR. (1991). Toward a logic of meanings (DavidsonP. M.EasleyJ., Eds.; De CapronaD.DavidsonP. M., Trans.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. (Original work published 1987)
84.
PiagetJ.HenriquesG. (1978). Recherches sur la généralisation [Research on generalization]. Paris, France: Presses universitaires de France.
85.
PiagetJ.HenriquesG.AscherE. (1992). Morphisms and categories (BrownT., Trans.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. (Original work published 1990)
86.
PiagetJ.InhelderB. (1973). Memory and intelligence (PomeransA. J., Trans.). New York, NY: Basic Books. (Original work published 1968)
87.
QuineW. V. O. (1940a). [Review of the article, “Le groupement additif des relations transitives asymétriques,” by J. Piaget]. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 5(4), 157.
88.
QuineW. V. O. (1940b). [Review of the article, “Les groupes de la logistique et la réversibilité de la pensée,” by J. Piaget]. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 5(4), 157.
89.
QuineW. V. O. (1960, February26). [Letter to Beth, regarding Quine’s reluctance to join the advisory board of Piaget’s International Center for Genetic Epistemology]. W. V. Quine Papers (MS Am 2587 [852], Box 31). Houghton Library, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
90.
RatcliffM. J. (Ed.). (2010). Bonjour monsieur Piaget [Hello Mr. Piaget]. Paris, France: Somogy editions d’art.
91.
RatcliffM. J. (2016). Heurs et malheurs d’une tentative de modélisation : Jean Piaget et la formalisation structures de l’esprit (1937–1972) [The ups and downs of modeling: Jean Piaget and the formalization of the mind’s structures, 1937–1972]. In BlanckaertC. (Ed.), Modèles et modélisations en sciences du langage, de l’homme et de la société [Models and modeling in the sciences of language, of man, and of society] (pp. 333–351). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.
92.
RatcliffM. J.BurmanJ. T. (2015). De la geste archivistique au geste de l’historien: Comment une politique d’archivage proxémique permet de retrouver un inédit disséminé [From archival operation to historical act: How a “proxemic” approach enabled the discovery of several unpublished books by Piaget]. In BertJ.-F.RatcliffM. J. (Eds.), Frontières d’archives: Recherche, mémoire, savoirs [Archival frontiers: Research, memory, knowledge] (pp. 131–144). Paris, France: Edition des archives contemporaines.
93.
RussellB. (1903). The principles of mathematics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
94.
RussellB. (1908). Mathematical logic as based on the theory of types. American Journal of Mathematics, 30, 222–262.
RussellB.WhiteheadA. N. (1910–1913). Principia mathematica (Vols. 1–3). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
97.
SmithL. (1999). What Piaget learned from Frege. Developmental Review, 19(1), 133–153.
98.
van AttenM. (2014). Gödel and intuitionism. In DubucsJ.BourdeauM. (Eds.), Constructivity and computability in historical and philosophical perspective (pp. 169–214). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
99.
van AttenM.KennedyJ. (2003). On the philosophical development of Kurt Gödel. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 9(4), 425–476.
100.
van HeijenoortJ (Ed.). (1967). From Frege to Gödel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
101.
VidalF. (1992). Jean Piaget’s early critique of Mendelism: “La notion de l’espèce suivant l’école mendélienne” (a 1913 manuscript). History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 14(1), 113–135.
102.
VidalF. (1994). Piaget before Piaget. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
103.
VoyatG. (1982). Piaget systematized. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
