This article explores occasions when professionals in law enforcement and medicine find themselves trapped amidst the paradoxical demands of diagnostic/investigative practice. By juxtaposing research into the experiences of police officers charged with interviewing children who are the alleged victims of sexual abuse, and clinicians tasked with diagnosing and managing contested cases of thyroid disease, the paper develops an understanding of such practice paradoxes as occasions of stalled transition, or liminal hotspots. Drawing on a process theoretical understanding of liminality, the analysis explores the personal, experiential, and affective efficacy of the epistemological framework that both practices share. While liminal hotspots denote paradox stalemates, the paper argues that they are also responsible for recurrent instants of temporary affective unsettledness, and as such can provoke novel thinking and agency towards innovation in practice areas notoriously resistant to change and improvement. Systematizing this property could turn them into resources for change.
BellS. (1988). When Salem came to the boro: The true story of the Cleveland child abuse crisis. London, UK: Pan Books.
3.
BergM. (1995). Turning a practice into a science: Conceptualizing post war medical practice. Social Studies of Science, 25(3), 437–476.
4.
BullR. (1998). Obtaining information from child witnesses. In MemonA.VrijA.BullR. (Eds.), Psychology and law: Truthfulness, accuracy and credibility (pp. 188–210). London, UK: McGraw-Hill.
5.
CeciS. J.BruckM. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
CeciS. J.HuffmannM. L. C.SmithE.LoftusE. F. (1994). Repeatedly thinking about a non-event: Source misattributions among preschoolers. Consciousness and Cognition, 3, 388–407.
7.
ClinchM. (2010). Muddling through with non-compliant biology: An ethnographic investigation into the meaning and practices of evidence in an NHS thyroid disease outpatients’ clinic (Unpublished doctoral thesis). The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
8.
ClinchM.AshcroftR.ShawS.SwinglehurstD. (2017). Liminality in practice: A case study in life sciences research. Manuscript submitted for publication.
9.
DaggettP. (2000). The perils and pitfalls of unnecessary thyroid hormone replacement. The British Thyroid Foundation Newsletter, 34, 1–2.
10.
EdwardsA.ElwynG. (2009). Shared decision-making in health care: Achieving evidence-based patient choice (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
FeatherstoneB.WhiteS.MorrisK. (2014). Re-imagining child protection: Towards humane social work with families. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
GrecoM. (1998). Between social and organic norms: Reading Canguilhem and “somatization”. Economy and Society, 27(2), 234–248.
15.
GrecoM.StennerP. (2017). From paradox to pattern shift: Conceptualising liminal hotspots and their affective dynamics. Theory & Psychology, 27, 147–166.
16.
GullW. W. (1873). On a cretinoid state supervening in adult life in women. Transactions of the Clinical Society of London, 7, 180–185.
17.
HarawayD. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
KofoedJ.StennerP. (2017). Suspended liminality: Vacillating affects in cyberbullying/research. Theory & Psychology, 27, 167–182.
22.
LeeN. (1999). Distributions of childhood’s ambiguity in adult institutions. Childhood: A global journal of child research, 6(4), 455–474.
23.
LeeN.MotzkauJ. (2013). Varieties of biosocial imagination: Reframing responses to climate change and antibiotic resistance. Science, Technology & Human Value, 38(4), 447–469.
24.
MayC.RapleyT.MoreiraT.FinchT.HeavenB. (2006). Technogovernance: Evidence, subjectivity, and the clinical encounter in primary care medicine. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 1022–1030.
25.
McDougallW. (1911). An introduction to social psychology. Boston, MA: John W. Luce.
26.
MolA. (2008). The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. London, UK: Routledge.
MotzkauJ. F. (2007b). Matters of suggestibility, memory and time: Child witnesses in court and what really happened. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(1), Art. 14. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/204
29.
MotzkauJ. F. (2009). Exploring the transdisciplinary trajectory of suggestibility. Subjectivity, 27, 172–194.
30.
MotzkauJ. F. (2010). Speaking up against justice: Credibility, suggestibility and children’s memory on trial. In ReaveyP.HaakenJ. (Eds.), Memory matters (pp. 63–85). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
31.
MotzkauJ. F. (2011). Around the day in eighty worlds: Deleuze, suggestibility and researching practice as process. In StennerP.CrombyJ.MotzkauJ.YenJ. (Eds.), Theoretical psychology: Global transformations and challenges (pp. 58–71). Toronto, Canada: Captus Press.
32.
MotzkauJ. F. (2016). Researching practice as process: From dark listening to immersive navigation. Manuscript in preparation.
RoseN. (2006). Politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
SidisB.JamesW. (1919). The psychology of suggestion. New York, NY: D. Appleton and Company.
39.
SpencerJ. R.FlinR. (1993). The evidence of children: The law and the psychology. London, UK: Blackstone Press.
40.
StellerM. (2000). Forensische aussagepsychologie als angewandte entwicklungs- und kognitionspsychologie [Forensic statement psychology as applied developmental and cognitive psychology]. Praxis der Rechtspsychologie (Sonderheft 1), 9–28.
41.
StengersI. (2008). Experimenting with refrains: Subjectivity and the challenge of escaping modern dualism. Subjectivity, 22, 38–59.
