Recently, mentalization theory has risen to fame as a theoretical framework emphasising social cognition as a key issue in its approach to psychopathology and psychotherapy. In this article, I review and criticise the social-ontological assumptions made by mentalization theory, arguing that, in spite of a strong interactive focus, it remains fundamentally rooted in a Cartesian ontology, overlooking embodied, expressive, enactive, and sociocultural dimensions of social cognition. Furthermore, since mentalization theory was originally developed as a framework for understanding Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), I offer a reinterpretation of the issue of social cognition reported in BPD from a more embodied and interactional perspective. Contrary to the received view, I suggest that issues of social cognition in BPD should not necessarily be seen as a partial or total inability to mentalize, but rather as a hypersensitivity to expressivity resulting in what I suggest we understand as acts of disnarration.
AllenJ. G. (2006). Mentalizing in practice. In AllenJ. G.FonagyP. (Eds.), Handbook of mentalization-based treatment (pp. 3–30). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
2.
BatemanA.FonagyP. (2006). Mentalizing and borderline personality disorder. In AllenJ. G.FonagyP. (Eds.), Handbook of mentalization-based treatment (pp. 185–200). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
3.
BatemanA.FonagyP. (2010). Mentalization based treatment for borderline personality disorder. World Psychiatry, 9(1), 11–15.
4.
BatemanA.FonagyP. (2012a). Borderline personality disorder. In BatemanA.FonagyP. (Eds.), Handbook of mentalizing in mental health practice (pp. 273–288). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
5.
BatemanA.FonagyP. (Eds.). (2012b). Handbook of mentalization in mental health practice. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
6.
BatemanA.FonagyP.LuytenP. (2012). Introduction and overview. In BatemanA.FonagyP. (Eds.), Handbook of mentalization in mental health practice (pp. 3–43). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
7.
BennettM. R.HackerP. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. London, UK: Blackwell.
8.
BittnerR. (2001). Doing things for reasons. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
BoS.SharpC.FonagyP.KongerslevM. (2015). Hypermentalizing, attachment, and epistemic trust in adolescent BPD: Clinical illustrations. Personality Disorders, 8(2), 172–182. doi: 10.1037/per0000161
10.
BrunerJ. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research, 71(3), 11–32.
11.
BrunerJ. (2009). Actual minds, possible worlds. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
DavidsenA. S.FosgerauC. F. (2015). Grasping the process of implicit mentalization. Theory & Psychology, 25, 434–454. doi: 10.1177/0959354315580605
14.
DennettD. C. (1989). The Intentional Stance. A Bradford Book. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: The MIT Press.
15.
De FinaAGeorgakopoulouA. (2011). Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
De JaegherHDi PaoloE. (2007). Participatory sense-making. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507.
17.
DinsdaleN.CrespiB. J. (2013). The borderline empathy paradox: Evidence and conceptual models for empathic enhancements in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27(2), 172–195.
18.
FertuckE.JekalA.SongI.WymanB.MorrisM.WilsonS.StanleyB. (2009). Enhanced “reading the mind in the eyes” in borderline personality disorder compared to healthy controls. Psychological Medicine, 39(12), 1979–1988.
19.
FonagyP. (2006). The mentalization-focused approach to social development. In AllenJ. G.FonagyP. (Eds.), Handbook of mentalization-based treatment (pp. 53–100). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
20.
FonagyP.AllisonE. (2014). The role of mentalizing and epistemic trust in the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy, 51(3), 372–380.
21.
FonagyP.BatemanA. (2008). The development of borderline personality disorder: A mentalizing model. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22(1), 4–21.
22.
FonagyP.LuytenP. (2009). A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 21(4), 1355–1381.
23.
FrankfurtH. G. (1988). The importance of what we care about: Philosophical essays. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
FuchsT.De JaegherH. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 465–486.
25.
GallagherS. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
GallagherS. (2008). Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(2), 535–543.
27.
GallagherS. (2012). Empathy, simulation, and narrative. Science in Context, 25(3), 355–381.
28.
GallagherS. (2014). An education in narratives. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(6), 600–609.
29.
GallagherS.HuttoD. D. (2008). Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice. In ZlatevJ.RacineT. P.SinhaC.ItkonenE. (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp. 17–38). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
30.
GallagherS.ZahaviD. (2008). The phenomenological mind: An introduction to philosophy of mind and cognitive sciences. London, UK: Routledge.
31.
GalleseV. (2009). Mirror neurons, embodied simulation, and the neural basis of social identification. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19(5), 519–536.
32.
GoldieP. (2012). The mess inside: Narrative, emotion, and the mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33.
GoldmanA. I. (2005). Imitation, mind reading, and simulation. In HurleyS.ChaterN. (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: Imitation, human development, and culture: Vol. 2 (pp. 79–94). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
HagenhoffM.FranzenN.GerstnerL.KoppeG.SammerG.NetterP.LisS. (2013). Reduced sensitivity to emotional facial expressions in borderline personality disorder: Effects of emotional valence and intensity. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27(1), 19–35.
35.
HeideggerM. (2001). Sein und Zeit [Being and time]. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer. (Original work published 1927)
36.
HenningT. (2009). Person sein und Geschichten erzählen: Eine Studie über personale Autonomie und narrative Gründe [Being a person and telling stories: A study in personal autonomy and narrative reasons]. Berlin, Germany: DeGruyter.
37.
HuttoD. (2008). Folk psychological narratives: The sociocultural basis of understanding reasons. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
38.
JuristE. L. (2010). Mentalizing minds. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 30(4), 289–300.
39.
KrohnA. (1974). Borderline “empathy” and differentiation of object representations: A contribution to the psychology of object relations. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 3(2), 142–165.
40.
LeudarI.CostallA. (2009). Against theory of mind. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
Merleau-PontyM. (1964). Signs. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
42.
Merleau-PontyM. (2012). Phenomenology of perception (LandesD. A., Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1945)
43.
PrinceG. (1988). The disnarrated in narrative theory and criticism. Style, 22(1), 1–8.
44.
RatcliffeM. (2007). Rethinking commonsense psychology: A critique of folk psychology, theory of mind, and simulation. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
SansoneR. A.SansoneL. A.GaitherG. A. (2004). Multiple types of childhood trauma and borderline personality symptomatology among a sample of diabetic patients. Traumatology, 10(4), 257–266.
46.
SchelerM. (1973). Wesen und Formen der Sympathie: der “Phänomenologie der Sympathiegefühle” [The nature of sympathy] (Vol. 1). Bern, Switzerland: A. Francke A. G. Verlag. (Original work published 1931)
47.
SchulzeL.DomesG.KöppenD.HerpertzS. C. (2012). Enhanced detection of emotional facial expressions in borderline personality disorder. Psychopathology, 46(4), 217–224.
48.
SharpC. (2014). The social–cognitive basis of BPD: A theory of hypermentalizing. In SharpC.TackettJ. L. (Eds.), Handbook of borderline personality disorder in children and adolescents (pp. 211–225). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
SwensonC.Choi-KainL. (2015). Mentalization and dialectical behavior therapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 69(2), 199–217.
51.
TanakaS. (2015). Intercorporeality as a theory of social cognition. Theory & Psychology, 25, 455–472. doi: 10.1177/0959354315583035
52.
TwemlowS.FonagyP. (2006). Transforming violent social systems into non-violent mentalizing systems: An experiment in schools. In AllenJ. G.FonagyP. (Eds.), Handbook of mentalization-based treatment (pp. 289–306). Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
53.
von Ceumern-LindenstjernaI.-A.BrunnerR.ParzerP.MundtC.FiedlerP.ReschF. (2009). Initial orienting to emotional faces in female adolescents with borderline personality disorder. Psychopathology, 43(2), 79–87.
54.
WaldenfelsB. (2015). Sozialität und Alterität: Modi sozialer Erfahrung [Sociality and alterity: Modes of social experience]. Berlin, Germany: Suhrkamp Verlag.
55.
ZahaviD. (2011). Empathy and direct social perception: A phenomenological proposal. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2(3), 541–558.
