An important aspect of Evald Ilyenkov’s theory of social mind is anti-innatism. Anti-innatism is not only the necessary logical outcome of Ilyenkov’s overall philosophical system and in particular of his anti-reductionism, but also it is a socio-historically possible and necessary consequence of the capitalist mode of production, which amounts to the formation of a gap between socially formed human knowledge and growth of the productive powers, on the one hand, and value-producing labour, on the other.
BakhurstD. (1991). Consciousness and revolution in Soviet philosophy: From the Bolsheviks to Evald Ilyenkov. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BakhurstD. (2008). Minds, brains, and education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(3–4), 415–432.
3.
BakhurstD. (2016, October). Punks versus zombies: Evald Ilyenkov and the battle for Soviet philosophy. Paper presented at the Max Planck Institute für Wissenschafts-Geschichte, Berlin, Germany.
IlyenkovE. (1969, Summer). Mind and brain (A reply to D. I. Dubrovskii). Soviet Studies in Philosophy, 87–106.
6.
IlyenkovE. (1982). The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx’s Capital. Moscow, Russia: Progress. (Original work published 1960)
7.
IlyenkovE. (2007a). Our schools must teach how to think!Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 45(4), 9–49.
8.
IlyenkovE. (2007b). The biological and the social in man. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 45(4), 64–68.
9.
IlyenkovE. (2007c). A contribution on the question of the concept of “activity” and its significance for pedagogy. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 45(4), 69–74.
10.
IlyenkovE. (2007d). A contribution to a conversation about Meshcheriakov. Journal of Russian and Eastern European Psychology, 45(4), 85–94.
11.
IlyenkovE. (2010). Psychology. Russian Studies in Philosophy, 48(4), 13–25.
12.
IlyenkovE. (2012). Dialectics of the ideal. Historical Materialism, 20(2), 149–193.
13.
KnoxJ. (2010). Response to Erik Goodwyn’sApproaching Archetypes: Reconsidering Innateness. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 55, 522–533.
14.
KurzR. (1986). The crisis of exchange value: Science as productive force, productive labor, and capitalist reproduction. In LarsenN.NilgesM.RobinsonJ.BrownN. (Eds.), Marxism and the critique of value (pp. 17–75). Chicago, IL: MCM.
15.
LuriaA. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
MarxK. (1904). A contribution to the critique of political economy (StoneN. I., Trans.). Chicago, IL: Charles H. Kerr & Company.
17.
MarxK. (1970). Critique of Hegel’s “Philosophy of Right” (JolinA.O’MalleyJ., Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
MarxK. (1989). Critique of the Gotha program. Moscow, Russia: Progress.
19.
MarxK. (1992). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 1.; FowkesB., Trans.). London, UK: Penguin Books.
20.
MarxK. (1993). Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy (NicolausM., Trans.). London, UK: Penguin Books.
21.
MerchantJ. (2010). Response to Erik Goodwyn’sApproaching Archetypes: Reconsidering Innateness. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 55, 534–542.
22.
MeshcheryakovA. (1979). Awakening to life. Moscow, Russia: Progress.
23.
MurrayP. (1999). Marx’s “truly social” labour theory of value: Part I. Abstract labour in Marxian value theory. Historical Materialism, 6(1), 27–66.
24.
PinkerS. (1997). How the mind works. London, UK: W. W. Norton.
25.
PostoneM. (2003). Time, labour, and social domination: A reinterpretation of Marx’s critical theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
VygotskyL. (1997a). Consciousness as a problem for the psychology of behavior. In ReiberR.WollockJ. (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 3 (pp. 63–80). New York, NY: Plenum Press. (Original work published 1925)
28.
VygotskyL. (1997b). The history of development of higher mental functions. In ReiberR. (Ed.) and HallM. (Trans.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 4 (pp. 1–259). New York, NY: Plenum Press. (Original work published 1931)
29.
VygotskyL. (1999). Tool and sign in the development of the child. In ReiberR. (Ed.) and HallM. (Trans.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 6 (pp. 1–65). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
