The main normative moral theories in Western thought, from deontology to virtue and consequentialist ethics, revolve around conceptions of the moral right, good, and worth. However, a few elementary psychological motives lie at a deeper level. In the present article, I outline the key tenets of regulatory focus, regulatory mode, and the hedonic principle (approach/avoidance), which I define as “motivational primitives,” and provide a conceptual analysis of their links with specific ethical systems. I unveil how moral judgment in each of them is psychologically construed on the basis of the motivational primitives and their underlying self-regulatory processes. The credibility of the proposed framework will be fully brought to life when researchers, having agreed on satisfactory operationalizations and manipulations of the primitives, will be able to reconcile the speculative and the empirical planes.
AthanassoulisN. (2000). A response to Harman: Virtue ethics and character traits. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (New Series), 100, 215–221. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4545326
5.
AvnetT.HigginsE. T. (2003). Locomotion, assessment, and regulatory fit: Value transfer from “how” to “what.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 525–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00027-1
6.
BanduraA. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In KurtinesW. M.GewirtzJ. L. (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (Vol. 1, pp. 45–103). Erlbaum.
7.
BarsalouL. W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(4), 629–654. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.629
8.
BenthamJ. (1996). Introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1789)
9.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. I. Basic Books.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (2012). Cybernetic control processes and the self-regulation of behavior. In RyanR. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 28–42). Oxford University Press.
12.
CarverC. S.WhiteT. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responding to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319
13.
CornwellJ. F. M.BellaA. F. (2022). Morals for the sake of movement: Locomotion and sensitivity to norms in moral dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 101, Article 104322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104322
14.
CornwellJ. F. M.HigginsE. T. (2015). The “ought” premise of moral psychology and the importance of the ethical “ideal.”Review of General Psychology, 19(3), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000044
15.
CornwellJ. F. M.HigginsE. T. (2018). The tripartite motivational human essence: Value, control, and truth working together. In van ZomerenM.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the human essence (pp. 71–81). Oxford University Press.
16.
CornwellJ. F. M.HigginsE. T. (2019). Beyond value in moral phenomenology: The role of epistemic and control experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02430
17.
CushmanF. (2013). Action, outcome, and value: A dual-system framework for morality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(3), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313495594
18.
DeweyJ. (2009). Ethics. General Books. (Original work published 1908)
19.
DubljevićV.RacineE. (2014). The ADC of moral judgment: Opening the black box of moral intuitions with heuristics about agents, deeds, and consequences. American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience, 5(4), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2014.939381
20.
ElliotA. J. (2008). Approach and avoidance motivation. In ElliotA. J. (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance (pp. 3–14). Psychology Press.
21.
ElliotA. J.FryerJ. W. (2008). The goal concept in psychology. In ShahJ.GardnerW. (Eds.), Handbook of motivational science (pp. 235–250). Guilford Press.
22.
ElliotA. J.ThrashT. M. (2002). Approach–avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 804–818. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.804
FellnerB.HollerM.KirchlerE.SchabmannA. (2007). Regulatory focus scale (RFS): Development of a scale to record dispositional regulatory focus. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 66(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.66.2.109
25.
FesmireS. (2003). John Dewey and moral imagination: Pragmatism in ethics. Indiana University Press.
26.
FreitasA. L.HigginsE. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action: The role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00401
27.
FreudS. (1957). Repression. In (StracheyJ., Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. 14 (pp. 141–158). Hogarth. (Original work published 1915)
28.
GollwitzerP. M.OettingenG. (2015). Motivation: History of the concept. In WrightJ. D. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 15, 2nd ed., pp. 936–939). Elsevier.
29.
GoodwinG. P.PiazzaJ.RozinP. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034726
30.
HawsK. L.DholakiaU. M.BeardenW. O. (2010). An assessment of chronic regulatory focus measures. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(5), 967–982. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.5.967
HigginsE. T. (2014). Beyond pleasure and pain: How motivation works. Oxford University Press.
34.
HigginsE. T.CornwellJ. F. M. (2016). Securing foundations and advancing frontiers: Prevention and promotion effects on judgment and decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.04.005
35.
HigginsE. T.CornwellJ. F. M.FranksB. (2014). “Happiness” and “the good life” as motives working together effectively. In ElliotA. J. (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (Vol. 1, pp. 135–179). Elsevier.
36.
HigginsE. T.FriedmanR. S.HarlowR. E.IdsonL. C.AydukO. N.TaylorA. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.27
37.
HursthouseR. (1999). On virtue ethics. Oxford University Press.
38.
IdsonL. C.LibermanN.HigginsE. T. (2004). Imagining how you’d feel: The role of motivational experiences from regulatory fit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 926–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264334
39.
JacksonC. J. (2009). Jackson-5 scales of revised reinforcement sensitivity theory (r-RST) and their application to dysfunctional real world outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(4), 556–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.007
40.
Janoff-BulmanR.SheikhS.HeppS. (2009). Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality: Two faces of moral regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013779
41.
KantI. (2012). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (GregorM.TimmermanJ., Trans., Rev. ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1785)
42.
KantI. (2015). Critique of practical reason (GregorM., Trans., Rev. ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1788)
KomissaroukS.ChernikovaM.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (2019). Who is most likely to wear rose-colored glasses? How regulatory mode moderates self-flattery. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(3), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218783194
45.
KruglanskiA. W.ThompsonE. P.HigginsE. T.AtashN. A.PierroA.ShahJ. Y.SpiegelS. (2000). To “do the right thing” or to “just do it”: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.793
LewinK. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. McGraw-Hill.
48.
LockwoodP.JordanC. H.KundaZ. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 854–864. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.854
49.
MaslowA. (1955). Deficiency motivation and growth motivation. In JonesM. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 1–30). University of Nebraska Press.
50.
McClellandD. C. (1985). Human motivation. Cambridge University Press.
51.
MuiseA.BoudreauG. K.RosenN. O. (2017). Seeking connection versus avoiding disappointment: An experimental manipulation of approach and avoidance sexual goals and the implications for desire and satisfaction. Journal of Sex Research, 54(3), 296–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1152455
52.
OuschanL.BolderoJ. M.KashimaY.WakimotoR.KashimaE. S. (2007). Regulatory focus strategies scale: A measure of individual differences in the endorsement of regulatory strategies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10(4), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00233.x
53.
PavlovI. (1927). Conditioned reflexes: An investigation into the physiological activity of the cortex (AnrepG., Trans.). Dover.
54.
RawlsJ. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
55.
RawlsJ. (1975). The independence of moral theory. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 48, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.5840/apapa2013245
56.
ReuterM.CooperA. J.SmillieL. D.MarkettS.MontagC. (2015). A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: Psychometric criteria and genetic validation. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 9, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00038
57.
ReynoldsS. J.CeranicT. L. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1610–1624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1610
58.
RossW. D. (1930). The right and the good. Oxford University Press.
59.
RotterJ. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Prentice-Hall.
60.
RyanR. M. (2012). Motivation and the organization of human behavior: Three reasons for the reemergence of a field. In RyanR. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 3–10). Oxford University Press.
61.
ScholerA. A.CornwellJ. M. F.HigginsE. T. (2019). Should we approach approach and avoid avoidance? An inquiry from different levels. Psychological Inquiry, 30(3), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2019.1643667
62.
ScholerA. A.HigginsE. T. (2008). Distinguishing levels of approach and avoidance: An analysis using regulatory focus theory. In ElliotA. J. (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 489–503). Psychology Press.
63.
SkinnerB. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Prentice-Hall.
64.
SloteM. (2001). Morals from motives. Oxford University Press.
65.
StrachmanA.GableS. L. (2006). What you want (and do not want) affects what you see (and do not see): Avoidance social goals and social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(11), 1446–1458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206291007
66.
TimmonsM. (2013). Moral theory: An introduction (2nd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
67.
TorrubiaR.ÁvilaC.MoltóJ.CaserasX. (2001). The sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray’s anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 837–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00183-5
68.
UhlmannE. L.PizarroD. A.DiermeierD. (2015). A person-centered approach to moral judgment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614556679
69.
UrmsonJ. O. (1958). Saints and heroes. In MeldenA. I. (Ed.), Essays in moral philosophy (pp. 198–216). University of Washington Press.
70.
Van NordenB. W. (2011). Introduction to classical Chinese philosophy. Hackett.
71.
Van ZylL. (2019). Virtue ethics: A contemporary introduction. Routledge.
72.
WatsonG. (2003). On the primacy of character. In DarwallS. (Ed.), Virtue ethics (pp. 229–250). Blackwell.
73.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
74.
WilliamsB. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Harvard University Press.
75.
YudaninM. (2015). Can positive duties be derived from Kant’s categorical imperative?Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 18(3), 595–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-014-9546-4
