Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Since the transition from finalism to contextualism, the history of science seems to be caught up in a basic dilemma. Many historians fear that with the new contextualist standards of rigorous historiography, historical research can no longer be relevant to working scientists themselves. The present article argues that this `dilemma of rigor vs relevance' is particularly urgent to `community' historians affiliated with the very scientific communities whose history they study. The solutions of Kurt Danziger and J. F. Hans van Rappard, both community historians of psychology, are discussed, and the author adds her own community historian's views for debate. These include, that there are no cogent reasons for completely rejecting finalism, but that, at present, rigorous symmetrical contextualism actually is the best way to produce relevant results. It is also argued that the common tale of scientists only tolerating congenial histories might be largely based on misinterpretations.

Keywords

contextualism finalism historiography relevance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Danziger, K. (1994). Does the history of psychology have a future? Theory & Psychology, 4, 467-484.

Danziger, K. (1997). The future of psychology history's is not its past: A reply to Rappard. Theory & Psychology, 7, 107-111.

Dehue, T. (1995). Changing the rules: Psychology in the Netherlands 1900-1985. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rappard, J. F. H. van . (1988). In praise of `Problemgeschichte'. In W. J. Baker , M. E. Hyland , R. van Hezewijk , & S. Terwee (Eds.), Recent trends in theoretical psychology (Vol. II, pp. 317-327). New York: Springer.

Rappard, J. F. H. van . (1993). History in psychology. Psychologie und Geschichte, 4, 187-196.

Rappard, J. F. H. van . (1997). History of psychology turned inside(r) out: A comment on Danziger. Theory & Psychology, 7, 101-105.

Skinner, Q. (1969). Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History & Theory, 8, 3-53.

Stocking, G.W. (1965). On the limits of `presentism' and `historicism' in the historiography of the behavioral sciences. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1, 211-218.

Turner, J. R. G. (1990). The history of science and the working scientist. In R. C. Olby (Ed.), Companion to the history of science (pp. 23-31). London: Routledge.

10.

Zenderland, L. (1998). Measuring minds: Henry Herbard Goddard and the origins of American intelligence testing. New York: Cambridge University Press.