To study the link between different types of collective bargaining systems and employment, unemployment and wage inequality, I use a novel taxonomy of bargaining systems in 36 OECD countries between 1980 and 2015. The results show that coordinated bargaining systems are associated with higher employment, better integration of vulnerable groups and lower wage inequality than fully decentralized systems. Uncoordinated centralized systems perform similarly in terms of unemployment to fully decentralized systems but are associated with higher employment and lower wage inequalities. These results suggest that the link between decentralization and good labour market outcomes is more nuanced than previously suggested.
AidtTTzannatosZ (2002) Unions and Collective Bargaining: Economic Effects in a Global Environment. Washington, DC: World Bank.
2.
AidtTTzannatosZ (2008) Trade unions, collective bargaining and macroeconomic performance: A review. Industrial Relations Journal39(4): 258–295.
3.
AutorD (2003) Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. Journal of Labor Economics21(1): 1–42.
4.
BakerDGlynAHowellDSchmittJ (2005) Labor market institutions and unemployment: Assessment of the crosscountry evidence. In: HowellD (ed.) Fighting Unemployment: The Limits of Free Market Orthodoxy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 72–118.
5.
BassaniniADuvalR (2006) Employment patterns in OECD countries: Reassessing the role of policies and institutions. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper no. 35. Paris: OECD.
6.
BechterBBraakmannNBrandlB (2019) Variable pay systems and/or collective wage bargaining? Complements or substitutes?Industrial and Labor Relations Review. Epub ahead of print 29October. DOI: 10.1177/0019793919883882.
7.
BechterBBrandlBMeardiG (2012) Sectors or countries? Typologies and levels of analysis in comparative industrial relations. European Journal of Industrial Relations18(3): 185–202.
8.
BertolaG (1999) Microeconomic perspectives on aggregate labor markets. In: AshenfelterOCardD (eds) Handbook of Labor Economics. Rotterdam: Elsevier, pp. 2985–3028.
9.
BlanchflowerDFreemanR (1993) Did the Thatcher reforms change British labour performance? NBER Working Paper no. 4384. Cambridge: NBER.
10.
BlauFKahnL (1999) Institutions and laws in the labor market. In: AshenfelterOCardD (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics. Rotterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1399–1461.
11.
BoeriT (2014) Two-tier bargaining. IZA Discussion Paper no. 8358. Bonn: IZA.
12.
BraakmannNBrandlB (2016) The efficacy of hybrid collective bargaining systems: An analysis of the impact of collective bargaining on company performance in Europe. MPRA Paper no. 70025. Munich: MPRA.
CameronD (1984) Social democracy, corporatism, labour quiescence and the representation of economic interest in advanced capitalist societies. In: GoldthorpeJ (ed.) Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 143–178.
15.
CardDLemieuxTRiddellW (2004) Unions and wage inequality. Journal of Labor Research25(4): 519–559.
16.
CarlssonMHäkkinen SkansINordström SkansO (2019) Wage flexibility in a unionized economy with stable wage dispersion. IZA Discussion Paper no. 12093. Bonn: IZA.
17.
D’AmuriFNizziR (2018) Recent developments of Italy’s industrial relations system. E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies7(2): 19–47.
18.
de SerresAMurtinF (2014) Unemployment at risk: the policy determinants of labour market exposure to economic shocks. Economic Policy29(80): 603–637.
19.
DiNardoJLeeD (2004) Economic impacts of new unionization on private sector employers: 1984-2001. Quarterly Journal of Economics119(4): 1383–1441.
20.
ElmeskovJMartinJScarpettaS (1998) Key lessons for labour market reforms: Evidence from OECD countries’ experience. Swedish Economic Policy Review5(2): 205–232.
21.
FreemanR (1988) Union density and economic performance: An analysis of U.S. States. European Economic Review32(2–3): 707–716.
22.
GrammCSchnellJ (2001) The use of flexible staffing arrangements in core production jobs. Industrial and Labor Relations Review54(2): 245–258.
23.
IbsenCKeuneM (2018) Organised decentralisation of collective bargaining: Case studies of Germany, Netherlands and Denmark. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, OECD, Paris.
24.
ILO (2015) Labour Markets, Institutions and Inequality: Building Just Societies in the 21st Century. Geneva: ILO.
25.
JaumotteFBuitronC (2015) Inequality and labor market institutions. Staff Discussion Note 15/14. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
26.
LeonardiMPellizzariMTabassoD (2019) Wage compression within the firm. Economic Journal129(624): 3256–3291.
27.
MaloneyT (1997) Has New Zealand’s Employment Contracts Act increased employment and reduced wages?Australian Economic Papers36(69): 243–264.
28.
MarginsonPWelzC (2014) Changes to Wage-Setting Mechanisms in the Context of the Crisis and the EU’s New Economic Governance Regime. Dublin: Eurofound.
29.
MurtinFde SerresAHijzenA (2014) Unemployment and the coverage extension of collective wage agreements. European Economic Review71: 52–66.
30.
NickellS (1997) Unemployment and labor market rigidities: Europe versus North America. Journal of Economic Perspectives11(3): 55–74.
31.
NickellSLayardR (1999) Labor market institutions and economic performance. In: AshenfelterOCardD (eds) Handbook of Labor Economics. Rotterdam: Elsevier, pp. 3029–3084.
32.
OECD (1997) OECD Employment Outlook 1997. Paris: OECD.
33.
OECD (2004) OECD Employment Outlook 2004. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2012) OECD Employment Outlook 2012. Paris: OECD.
36.
OECD (2017) Collective bargaining in a changing world of work. In: OECD Employment Outlook 2017. Paris: OECD, pp. 125–186.
37.
OECD (2018) The role of collective bargaining systems for good labour market performance. In: OECD Employment Outlook 2018. Paris: OECD.
38.
OECD (2019) Negotiating Our Way Up: Collective Bargaining in a Changing World of Work. Paris: OECD.
39.
RayJ-E (2017) Hiérarchie des normes, Les cinq ordonnances du 22 septembre 2017 sont parues: où est «l’inversion des normes» partout dénoncée?La semaine juridique42: 1914–1916.
40.
Saint-PaulG (1996) Dual Labor Markets: A Macroeconomic Perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press.
41.
SalvatoriA (2009) What do unions do to temporary employment? IZA Discussion Paper no. 4554. Bonn: IZA.
42.
ScarpettaS (1996) Assessing the role of labour market policies and institutional settings on unemployment: A cross-country study. OECD Economic Studies no. 26. Paris: OECD.
43.
SchultenTBispinckR (2018) Varieties of decentralisation in German collective bargaining. In: LeonardiSPedersiniR (eds) Multi-Employer Bargaining Under Pressure: Decentralisation Trends in Five European Countries. Brussels: ETUI, pp. 105–149.
44.
SoskiceD (1990) Reinterpreting corporatism and explaining unemployment: Coordinated and non-coordinated market economies. In: BrunettaRDell’AringaC (eds) Labour Relations and Economic Performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 170–211.
45.
TraxlerF (1995) Farewell to labour market associations? Organized versus disorganized decentralization as a map for industrial relations. In: CrouchCTraxlerF (eds) Organized Industrial Relations in Europe: What Future?Aldershot: Avebury, pp. 3–19.
46.
TraxlerFBrandlB (2012) Collective bargaining, inter-sectoral heterogeneity and competitiveness: A cross-national comparison of macroeconomic performance. British Journal of Industrial Relations50(1): 73–98.
47.
TraxlerFBlaschkeSKittelB (2001) National Labour Relations in Internationalized Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
VisserJ (2016) What happened to collective bargaining during the great recession?IZA Journal of Labor Policy5: 9.
49.
VisserJ (2019) ICTWSS: Database on institutional characteristics of trade unions, wage setting, state intervention and social pacts in 55 countries between 1960 and 2018. Available at: http://www.uva-aias.net/en/ictwss
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
