Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Cure fraction models are useful to model lifetime data with long-term survivors. We propose a flexible four-parameter cure rate survival model called the log-sinh Cauchy promotion time model for predicting breast carcinoma survival in women who underwent mastectomy. The model can estimate simultaneously the effects of the explanatory variables on the timing acceleration/deceleration of a given event, the surviving fraction, the heterogeneity, and the possible existence of bimodality in the data. In order to examine the performance of the proposed model, simulations are presented to verify the robust aspects of this flexible class against outlying and influential observations. Furthermore, we determine some diagnostic measures and the one-step approximations of the estimates in the case-deletion model. The new model was implemented in the generalized additive model for location, scale and shape package of the R software, which is presented throughout the paper by way of a brief tutorial on its use. The potential of the new regression model to accurately predict breast carcinoma mortality is illustrated using a real data set.

Keywords

Cure rate models regression models residual analysis sensitivity analysis generalized additive model for location scale and shape

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berkson

Gage

. Survival curve for cancer patients following treatment. J Am Stat Assoc 1952; 47: 501–515.

Boag

. Maximum likelihood estimates of the proportion of patients cured by cancer therapy. J R Stat Soc B 1949; 11: 15–53.

Farewell

. The use of mixture models for the analysis of survival data with long-term survivors. Biometrics 1982; 38: 1041–1046.

Yakovlev

Tsodikov

. Stochastic models of tumor latency and their biostatistical applications. In: Mathematical biology and medicine 1996; Vol. 1. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific, pp. 321–326.

de Castro

Cancho

Rodrigues

. A hands-on approach for fitting long-term survival models under the GAMLSS framework. Comput Meth Progr Biomed 2010; 97: 168–177.

Hellwig

Hengstler

Schmidt

et al.

Comparison of scores for bimodality of gene expression distributions and genome-wide evaluation of the prognostic relevance of high-scoring genes. BMC Bioinformat 2010; 11: 1–1.

Ramires

Ortega

EMM

Cordeiro

et al.

A bimodal flexible distribution for lifetime data. J Stat Comput Simulat. Epub ahead of print 8 June 2015. DOI:10.1080/00949655.2015.1115047.

Ortega

Cancho

Paula

. Generalized log-gamma regression models with cure fraction. Lifetime Data Anal 2009; 15: 79–106.

Silva

Ortega

EMM

Cancho

et al.

Log-Burr XII regression models with censored data. Comput Stat Data Analy 2008; 52: 3820–3842.

10.

Hashimoto

Ortega

EMM

Cordeiro

et al.

The Log-Burr XII regression model for grouped survival data. J Biopharmaceut Stat 2012; 22: 141–159.

11.

Rodrigues

de Castro

Cancho

et al.

COM—Poisson cure rate survival models and an application to a cutaneous melanoma data. J Stat Plan Infer 2009; 139: 3605–3611.

12.

Stasinopoulos

Rigby

. Generalized additive models for location scale and shape (GAMLSS) in R. J Stat Softw 2007; 23: 1–46.

13.

R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, www.R-project.org/ (2015, accessed 8 February 2017).

14.

Calsavara

Tomazella

Fogo

. The effect of frailty term in the standard mixture model. Chil J Stat 2013; 4: 95–109.

15.

Cooner

Banerjee

Carlin

et al.

Flexible cure rate modeling under latent activation schemes. J Am Stat Assoc 2007; 102: 560–572.

16.

Ibrahim

Chen

Sinha

. Bayesian survival analysis, New York: Springer, 2001.

17.

Taylor

. Identifiability of cure models. Stat Prob Lett 2001; 54: 389–395.

18.

Ortega

Cordeiro

Campelo

et al.

A power series beta Weibull regression model for predicting breast carcinoma. Stat Med 2015; 34: 1366–1388.

19.

Rigby

Stasinopoulos

. Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape. J R Stat Soc C 2005; 54: 507–554.

20.

Voudouris

Gilchrist

Rigby

et al.

Modelling skewness and kurtosis with the BCPE density in GAMLSS. J Appl Stat 2012; 39: 1279–1293.

21.

Dunn

Smyth

. Randomized quantile residuals. J Comput Graph Stat 1996; 5: 236–244.

22.

Buuren

Fredriks

. Worm plot: a simple diagnostic device for modelling growth reference curves. Stat Med 2001; 20: 1259–1277.

23.

Cook

. Assessment of local influence. J R Stat Soc B 1986; 48: 133–169.

24.

Cook

Weisberg

. Residuals and influence in regression, New York: Chapman and Hall, 1982.

25.

DeSantis

Bray

Ferlay

et al.

International variation in female breast cancer incidence and mortality rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prevent 2015; 24: 1495–1506.

26.

Fitzgibbons

Page

Weaver

et al.

Prognostic factors in breast cancer: College of American Pathologists consensus statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000; 124: 966–978.

27.

Berg

Gutierrez

NessAiver

et al.

Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer 1. Radiology 2004; 233: 830–849.

28.

Kattan

Giri

Panageas

et al.

A tool for predicting breast carcinoma mortality in women who do not receive adjuvant therapy. Cancer 2004; 101: 2509–2515.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB