Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Tree-based methods are very powerful and popular tools for analysing survival data with right-censoring. The existing methods assume that the true time-to-event and the censoring times are independent given the covariates. We propose different ways to build survival forests when dependent censoring is suspected, by using an appropriate estimator of the survival function when aggregating the individual trees and/or by modifying the splitting rule. The appropriate estimator used in this paper is the copula-graphic estimator. We also propose a new method for building survival forests, called p-forest, that may be used not only when dependent censoring is suspected, but also as a new survival forest method in general. The results from a simulation study indicate that these modifications improve greatly the estimation of the survival function in situations of dependent censoring. A real data example illustrates how the proposed methods can be used to perform a sensitivity analysis.

Keywords

Survival data survival forest dependent-censoring ensemble methods copula-graphic right-censored data random forest sensitivity analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gordon

Olshen

. Tree-structured survival analysis. Cancer Treat Rep 1985; 69: 1065–1065.

Breiman

Friedman

Olshen

et al.

Classification and regression trees, Monterey, CA: Wadsworth & Brooks, 1984.

Bou-Hamad

Larocque

Ben-Ameur

. A review of survival trees. Stat Surv 2011; 5: 44–71.

Breiman

. Random forests. Mach Learn 2001; 45: 5–32.

Hothorn

Lausen

Benner

et al.

Bagging survival trees. Stat Med 2004; 23: 77–91.

Hothorn

Bühlmann

Dudoit

et al.

Survival ensembles. Biostatistics 2006; 7: 355–373.

Hothorn

Hornik

Zeileis

. Unbiased recursive partitioning: a conditional inference framework. J Comput Graph Stat 2006; 15: 651–674.

Strobl

Boulesteix

Zeileis

et al.

Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics 2007; 8: 25–25.

Strobl

Boulesteix

Kneib

et al.

Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics 2008; 9: 307–307.

10.

Hothorn

Zeileis

. partykit: A modular toolkit for recursive partytioning in r. J Mach Learn Res 2015; 16: 3905–3909.

11.

Loh

. Regression trees with unbiased variable selection and interaction detection. Stat Sin 2002; 12: 361–386.

12.

Loh W. Guide user manual. Updated for version 25.4. Technical report. Department of Statistics University of Wisconsin Madison, 2017.

13.

Ishwaran

Blackstone

Pothier

et al.

Relative risk forests for exercise heart rate recovery as a predictor of mortality. J Am Stat Assoc 2004; 99: 591–600.

14.

Ishwaran

Kogalur

Blackstone

et al.

Random survival forests. Ann Appl Stat 2008; 2: 841–860.

15.

Ishwaran H and Kogalur U. Random forests for survival, regression and classification (rf-src). R package version 1.5.5. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/randomForestSRC/ (accessed 20 January 2015).

16.

R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014, http://www.R-project.org/.

17.

Segal

. Regression trees for censored data. Biometrics 1988; 44: 35–47.

18.

Zhu

Kosorok

. Recursively imputed survival trees. J Am Stat Assoc 2012; 107: 331–340.

19.

Moradian

Larocque

Bellavance

. L1 splitting rules in survival forests. Lifetime Data Analysis 2016, pp. 1–21. DOI:10.1007/s10985-016-9372-1.

20.

Tiwari

Guha

. Mixture cure survival models with dependent censoring. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 2007; 69: 285–306.

21.

Emura

Chen

. Gene selection for survival data under dependent censoring: a copula-based approach. Stat Methods Med Res 2016; 25: 2840–2857.

22.

Staplin

Kimber

Collett

et al.

Dependent censoring in piecewise exponential survival models. Stat Methods Med Res 2015; 24: 325–341.

23.

Willems

SJW

Schat

van Noorden

et al.

Correcting for dependent censoring in routine outcome monitoring data by applying the inverse probability censoring weighted estimator. Stat Methods Med Res 2016; 27: 323–335.

24.

Zheng

Klein

. Estimates of marginal survival for dependent competing risks based on an assumed copula. Biometrika 1995; 82: 127–138.

25.

Rivest

Wells

. A martingale approach to the copula-graphic estimator for the survival function under dependent censoring. J Multivar Anal 2001; 79: 138–155.

26.

Sklar

. Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publications de l'Institut Statistique de l'Université de Paris 1959; 8: 229–231.

27.

Clayton

. A model for association in bivariate life tables and its application in epidemiological studies of familial tendency in chronic disease incidence. Biometrika 1978; 65: 141–151.

28.

Frank

. On the simultaneous associativity off (x, y) and x + y − f (x, y). Aequationes Math 1979; 19: 194–226.

29.

Nelsen

. An introduction to copulas. Lecture Notes in Statistics 1999; Vol. 139, New York: Springer.

30.

Lin

Jeon

. Random forests and adaptive nearest neighbors. J Am Stat Assoc 2006; 101: 578–590.

31.

Tsiatis

. A nonidentifiability aspect of the problem of competing risks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1975; 72: 20–22.

32.

Wang

Chandra

et al.

The identifiability of dependent competing risks models induced by bivariate frailty models. Scand J Stat 2015; 42: 427–437.

33.

Fleming

Harrington

. Counting processes and survival analysis, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 1991.

34.

Therneau T. A package for survival analysis in S. R package version 2.38. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival (2015).

35.

Seibold

Zeileis

Hothorn

. Individual treatment effect prediction for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Stat Methods Med Res 2017; 27: 3104–3125.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.64 MB

0.00 MB

Survival forests for data with dependent censoring

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material