How to justify ascribing intrinsic value to nature? This task emerged in the 1990s as “the central theoretical quest of environmental philosophy”, especially as concerns non-sentient living nature and superorganismic entities such as species. Since then, many theories have been offered to answer the ontological question of how nature's intrinsic value is to be understood, ranging from Moorean non-naturalist, objectivist theories to Elliot's subjectivist “indexical theory”. The question I shall focus on in this paper is related but different: How can we have evidence for the existence of such a value (however, nature's intrinsic value is to be understood, and whatever properties it is based on)? In other words, my focus is on the question of the epistemology of the (putative) intrinsic value of nature. My proposal is that there is a hitherto underappreciated epistemological resource lurking in aesthetic experiences of nature. Serious aesthetic experiences of nature can awaken emotions such as wonder and awe that, in light of recent perceptual theories of emotion, can be recognized as disclosing the intrinsic value of nature. In summary, I shall argue for what I see as a key epistemic role that aesthetic experience (of a certain sort) can have in grounding ascriptions of intrinsic value to nature.
BaronMW (1997) Love and respect in the doctrine of virtue. The Southern Journal of Philosophy36(Supplement): 29–44.
2.
BennettJ (1974) The conscience of huckleberry Finn. Philosophy49: 123–134.
3.
BradyE (2011) The ugly truth: Negative aesthetics and environment. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement69: 83–99.
4.
BradyE (2018) John muir’s environmental aesthetics: Interweaving the aesthetic, religious, and scientific. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism76(4): 463–472.
5.
CallicottJB (1992) Rolston on intrinsic value: A deconstruction. Environmental Ethics14(summer): 129–143.
6.
CarlsonA (2009) Nature and Landscape: An Introduction to Environmental Aesthetics. New York: Columbia University Press.
7.
DantoA (1964) The artworld. The Journal of Philosophy61(19): 571–584.
8.
DantoA (1983) The Transfiguration of the Commonplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
EkmanP (1992) An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion6(3): 169–200.
10.
ElliotR (1997) Faking Nature: The ethics of environmental restoration. New York: Routledge.
11.
FingerhutJPrinzJJ (2020) Aesthetic emotions reconsidered. The Monist103: 223–239.
12.
GloverJ (1999) Humanity: A Moral History of the Twentieth Century. New Haven: Yale University Press.
13.
HepburnRW (1980) The inaugural address: Wonder. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary54, pp. 1–23.
14.
KantI (2000[orig. 1790]) The Critique of the Power of Judgment, ed. and translated GuyerPaulMatthewsEric. Cambridge University Press.
15.
KeltnerDHaidtJ (2003) Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion17(2): 297–314.
16.
LoftisRJ (2003) Three problems for the aesthetic foundations of environmental ethics. Philosophy in the Contemporary World10(2): 41–50.
17.
McShaneK (2007) Why environmental ethics shouldn’t give up on intrinsic value. Environmental Ethics29: 43–61.
18.
MorrisonI (2004) Respect in kant: How the moral feeling of respect acts as an incentive to moral action. Southwest Philosophy Review20(2): 1–26.
19.
NanayB (2016) Aesthetics as Philosophy of Perception. OUP.
20.
O’NeillJ (1992) The varieties of intrinsic value. The Monist75(2): 119–137.
21.
ParsonsG (2008) Aesthetics and Nature. London: Continuum Press.
22.
PrinzJ (2004) Gut Reactions: a Perceptual Theory of Emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
PurdyJ (2015) After Nature: A Politics for the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
SiderisLH (2017) Consecrating Science: Wonder, Knowledge, and the Natural World. Oakland: University of California Press.
26.
SiderisLH (2019) Wonder sustained: A reply to critics. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science54(2): 426–453.
27.
SoberE (1986) Philosophical Problems for Environmentalism. The Preservation of Species.
28.
SorensenK (2018) Sympathy, love, and the faculty of feeling. In SorensenKWilliamsonD (eds.), Kant and the Faculty of Feeling. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–233.
29.
TappoletC (2016) Emotions, Value and Agency. Oxford: OUP.
30.
TaylorPW (1981) The Ethics of Respect for the Environment” reprinted in Andrew Light & Holmes Rolston III, Environmental Ethics. Blackwell, 2003.
31.
ThoreauHD (2006) [orig. 1854] Walden. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
WelchmanJ (2018) Aesthetics of nature, constitutive goods, and environmental conservation: A defense of moderate formalist aesthetics.The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism76(4): 419–428.
