Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article presents findings from a large-scale newspaper analysis of climate change discourses in four developed countries, using corpus linguistics methodology. We map the discourse over time, showing peaks and troughs of attention and explaining their causes. Different connotations of common terms such as global warming and climate change in different countries are analysed. Cluster and key-word analysis show the relative salience of specific words and word combinations during crucial periods. We identify main claims makers and the relative visibility of advocates and sceptics. The main finding is that former are far more prominent in all countries. We also look at the coverage of ‘climategate’. Finally, we make reference to existing theoretical frameworks.

Keywords

climate change framing risk media and science media representations public understanding of science science communication science experts

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Antilla

(2005) Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change 15(4): 338–352. Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.08.003.

Bell

(1991) The Language of News Media. Blackwell, Oxford

Biber

(2010) What can a corpus tell us about registers and genres? In: McCarthy

O’Keeffe

(eds) The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp.241–254.

Billett

(2009) Dividing climate change: Global warming in the Indian mass media. Climatic Change 99(1–2): 1–16. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-009-9605-3.

Boykoff

(2007) Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006. Area 39(2): 470–481.

Brossard

Shanahan

McComas

(2004) Are issue-cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change. Mass Communication & Society 7(3): 359–377.

Brulle

Carmichael

Jenkins

(2012) Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002–2010. Climatic Change 114(2): 169–188. DOI:10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y.

Bryant

Zillmann

(2002) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Carvalho

Burgess

(2005) Cultural circuits of climate change in UK broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Analysis 25(6): 1457–1469. DOI:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00692.x

10.

David

(1985) Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. Clio – A Journal of Literature History & the Philosophy of History 75(2): 332–337.

11.

Downs

(1972) Up and down with Ecology – the ‘issue-attention cycle’. The Public Interest 28: 38–50.

12.

Dunning

(1993) Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics 19(1): 61–74.

13.

Goldstone

(1998) Initial conditions, general laws, path dependence, and explanation in historical sociology. American Journal of Sociology 104(3): 829–845.

14.

Grundmann

(1999) The European public sphere and the deficit of democracy, ed. Smith

Dennis

Wright

Sue

. Sociology Review Monograph: 125–146.

15.

Grundmann

(2007) Climate change and knowledge politics. Environmental Politics 16(3): 414–432.

16.

Grundmann

Krishnamurthy

(2010) The discourse of climate change: A corpus-based approach. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 4(2): 125–146.

17.

Hilgartner

Bosk

(1988) The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. The American Journal of Sociology 94(7): 53–78.

18.

McCarthy

O’Keeffe

(2010) Historical perspective: What are corpora and how have they evolved? In McCarthy

O’Keeffe

(eds) The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 3–13.

19.

Morgan

Shanahan

(1996) Two decades of cultivation research: An appraisal and meta-analysis. Communication Yearbook 20: 1–45.

20.

Nisbet

(2009) Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 51(2): 12–23. DOI: 10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23.

21.

Nordhaus

Shellenberger

(2009) Apocalypse fatigue: Losing the public on climate change. Available at: e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2210 (accessed 29 October 2012).

22.

Ryghaug

Sorensen

Nass

(2010) Making sense of global warming: Norwegians appropriating knowledge of anthropogenic climate change. Public Understanding of Science 24(3): 1–18. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510362657.

23.

Sabatier

Jenkins-Smith

(1993) Policy Change and Learning. An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview Press.

24.

Scott

(1997) PC analysis of key words – and key key words. System 25(1): 1–13.

25.

Scott

(2008) WordSmith Tools version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.

26.

Tognini Bonelli

(2001) Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

27.

Trumbo

(1996) Constructing climate change: Claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue. Public Understanding of Science 5(3): 269–283.

28.

Whitmarsh

(2008) What’s in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of ‘climate change’ and ‘global warming’. Public Understanding of Science 18(4): 401–420.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.15 MB

0.00 MB

Disputed climate science in the media: Do countries matter?

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material