A content analysis of The New York Times’ Science Times section from 1998 to 2012 found evidence of increased source diversity in use of scientific journals as news sources. Science Times increased the frequency at which it cited journals, the number of different journals that it cited, and the number of disciplines represented by cited journals. The results suggest that online availability of a wide array of scientific journals has changed sourcing behaviors.
ClarkFIllmanDL (2006) A longitudinal study of the New York Times Science Times section. Science Communication27(4): 496–513.
3.
ConradP (1999) Uses of expertise: Sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of genetics in the news. Public Understanding of Science8(4): 285–302.
4.
CozmaR (2006) Source diversity increases credibility of risk stories. Newspaper Research Journal27(3): 8–21.
5.
DayAGGolanG (2005) Source and content diversity in op-ed pages: Assessing editorial strategies in the New York Times and the Washington Post. Journalism Studies6(1): 61–71.
6.
FranzenM (2012) Making science news: The press relations of scientific journals and implications for scholarly communication. In: RödderSFranzenMWeingartP (eds) The Sciences’ Media Connection—Public Communication and Its Repercussions. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 333–352.
7.
GansHJ (1979) Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
OkersonA (2000) Are we there yet? Online e-resources ten years after. Library Trends48(4): 671–693.
16.
RiffeDLacySFicoF (2005) Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research, 2nd edn.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
TuchmanG (1978) Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality. New York, NY: Free Press.
18.
VoakesPSKapferJKurpiusDChernDS (1996) Diversity in the news: A conceptual and methodological framework. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly73(3): 582–593.
