The essay reviews the literature, mostly historical, on the relationship between science and film-making, with a focus on the science documentary. It then discusses the circumstances of the emergence of the wildlife making-of documentary genre. The thesis examined here is that since the early days of cinema, film-making has evolved from being subordinate to science, to being an equal partner in the production of knowledge, controlled by non-scientists.
BellowsAMMacDougallM (2000) Science is Fiction: The Films of Jean Painlevé. San Francisco, CA: Brico Press.
4.
BiggC (2010) A visual history of Jean Perrin’s Brownian motion curves. In: DastonLLunbeckE (eds) Histories of Scientific Observation. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 156–179.
5.
BoonT (2008) Films of Facts: A History of Science in Documentary Films and Television. London: Wallflower Press.
6.
BoonT (2013) British science documentaries: Transitions from film to television. Journal of British Cinema and Television10(3): 475–497.
7.
BoonT (2015) The televising of science is a process of television’: Establishing Horizon, 1962–1967. The British Journal for the History of Science48(1): 87–121.
8.
BoonTGouyonJB (2015) The origins and practice of science on British television. In: ConboyMSteelJ (eds) The Routledge Companion to British Media History. London: Routledge, pp. 470–483.
9.
BouséD (2000) Wildlife Films. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
10.
BouséD (2003) False intimacy: Close-ups and viewer involvement in wildlife films. Visual Studies18(2): 123–132.
11.
BruzziS (2006) New Documentary, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
12.
BurtJ (2002) Animals in Films. London: Reaktion Books.
13.
CanalesJ (2011) Desired machines: Cinema and the world in its own image. Science in Context24(3): 329–359.
14.
ChananM (1996) The Dream That Kicks, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
15.
CornerJ (1996) The Art of Record: A Critical Introduction to Documentary. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
16.
CrockerN (1964) Natural History Unit Library. Personal letter to A.T. Callum (7.8.1964), BBC WAC R125/829/1.
17.
CurtisS (2009) Between observation and spectatorship: Medicine, movies and mass culture in Imperial Germany. In: LigensaAKreimeierK (eds) Film 1900: Technology, Perception, Culture. New Barnet: John Libbey Publishing, pp. 87–98.
18.
DaviesG (2000a) Narrating the Natural History Unit: Institutional orderings and spatial strategies. Geoforum31: 539–551.
19.
DaviesG (2000b) Science, observation and entertainment: Competing visions of postwar British Natural History Television, 1946–1967. Cultural Geographies7(4): 432–460.
20.
De CegliaFP (2011) From the laboratory to the factory, by way of the countryside: Fifty years of Italian scientific cinema (1908–1958). Public Understanding of Science21(8): 949–967.
21.
De CheveignéS (1999) Science on TV: Forms and reception of science programmes on French television. In: GripsrudJ (ed.) Television and Common Knowledge. London: Routledge, pp. 185–197.
22.
DuganD (2015) Science story-telling in TV documentaries. Actes d’Història de la Ciència i de la Tècnica7: 35–49.
23.
DumančićM (2012) De-Stalinizing soviet science: Rethinking the moral implications of scientific progress in Khrushchev-era film. Studies in Russian and Soviet Cinema6(1): 75–92.
24.
FarryJKirbyD (2012) The universe will be televised: Space, science, satellites and British television production, 1946–1969. History and Technology28(3): 311–333.
25.
FretzLE (2010) Surréalisme Sous-l’Eau: Science and surrealism in the early films and writings of Jean Painlevé. Film & History: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Film and Television Studies40(2): 45–65.
26.
GarandeauE (ed.) (2012) Filmer la Science, Comprendre la Vie. Le cinema de Jean Comandon [Filming Science, Understanding Life. The Cinema of Jean Comandon]. Paris: CNC.
27.
GayckenO (2002) ‘A drama unites them in a fight to the death’: Some remarks on the flourishing of a cinema of scientific vernacularization in France, 1909–1914. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television22(3): 353–374.
28.
GayckenO (2011) ‘The swarming of life’: Moving images, education, and views through the microscope. Science in Context24(3): 361–380.
29.
GayckenO (2012) The secret life of plants: Visualizing vegetative movement, 1880–1903. Early Popular Visual Culture10(1): 51–69.
30.
GouyonJ-B (2011a) From Kearton to Attenborough – Fashioning the telenaturalist’s identity. History of Science49(1): 25–60.
31.
GouyonJ-B (2011b) The BBC natural history unit. Instituting natural history film-making in Britain. History of Science49(4): 425–451.
32.
GregoryJMillerS (1998) Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. London: Plenum Trade.
33.
GunningT (1986) The cinema of attractions: Early film, its spectator, and the Avant-Garde. Wide Angle8(3–4): 63–70.
34.
HawkinsD (1962) BBC Natural History Unit. Report by Head of West Regional Programmes, BBC WAC WE17/2/1.
35.
JohnsonMD (2011) The science education film: Cinematizing technocracy and internationalizing development. Journal of Chinese Cinemas5(1): 31–53.
36.
JonesA (2014) Elite science and the BBC: A 1950s contest of ownership. The British Journal for the History of Science47(4): 701–723.
37.
KirbyDA (2011) Lab Coats in Hollywood: Science, Scientists, and Cinema. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
LandeckerH (2006) Microcinematography and the history of science and film. Isis97: 121–132.
39.
Lee-WrightP (2014) The documentary tradition. In: ConboyMSteelJ (eds) The Routledge Companion to British Media History. London: Routledge, pp. 425–436.
40.
LefebvreT (2012) Jean Comandon conférencier, 1909: Les débuts [Jean Comandon lecturer, 1909: the beginnings]. In: GarandeauE (ed.) Filmer la Science, Comprendre la Vie. Le cinema de Jean Comandon. Paris: CNC, pp. 413–420.
41.
LehmkuhlMKaramanidouCMöräTPetkovaKTrenchB (2012) Scheduling science on television: A comparative analysis of the representations of science in 11 European countries. Public Understanding of Science21(8): 1002–1018.
42.
McKechnieR (1996) Insiders and outsiders: Identifying experts on home ground. In: IrwinAWynneB (eds) Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 191–212.
43.
McKernanL (2007) Diverting Time: London’s cinemas and their audiences, 1906–1914. The London Journal32(2): 125–144.
44.
MannoniL (2012) Jean Comandon technicien [Jean Comandon engineer]. In: GarandeauE (ed.) Filmer la Science, Comprendre la Vie. Le cinema de Jean Comandon. Paris: CNC, pp. 47–59.
45.
MitmanG (1999) Reel Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
MitmanG (2006) Pachyderm personalities: The media of science, politics, and conservation. In: DastonLMitmanG (eds) Thinking with Animals. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, pp. 175–195.
47.
MorusIR (2006) Seeing and believing science. Isis97: 101–110.
48.
NadisF (2005) Wonder Shows: Performing Science, Magic, and Religion in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
49.
OrtolanoG (2009) The Two Cultures Controversy: Science, Literature and Cultural Politics in Postwar Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
ParsonsC (1982) True to Nature. Cambridge: Patrick Stephens Ltd.
51.
Radio Times (1936) A private view of the new home of television. Radio Times53(682): 8–9.
52.
ReidRW (1969) Television producer and scientist. Nature223: 455–458.
53.
RubyJ (2005) The image mirrored: Reflexivity and the documentary film. In: RosenthalACornerJ (eds) New Challenges for Documentary. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 34–47.
54.
ShapinS (1994) A Social History of Truth. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
55.
ShapinS (2008) The Scientific Life. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
56.
ShapinSSchafferS (1985) Leviathan and the Air Pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
SilverstoneR (1988) The museums and the media. A theoretical and methodological exploration. The International Journal of Museum Management and Curatorship7: 231–241.
58.
SilverstoneR (2005) The sociology of mediation and communication. In: CalhounCRojekCTurnerBS (eds) The Sage Handbook of Sociology. London: SAGE, pp. 188–207.
59.
SingerA (1966a) Science Broadcasting. BBC Lunch-Time Lectures Fourth Series-5 (16February). London: British Broadcasting Corporation.
60.
SingerA (1966b) Television: Window on culture or reflection in the glass?The American Scholar35(2): 303–309.
61.
The Observer (1961) National nature week planned. 4June, p. 8.
62.
Van DijckJ (2006) Picturizing science: The science documentary as multimedia spectacle. International Journal of Cultural Studies9(1): 5–24.
63.
WapshottN (1980) The perfect teacher, back with the animals. The Times, 1March, p. 14.
64.
WellmannJ (ed.) (2011) Cinematography, Seriality, and the Sciences (Special issue of Science in Context, Volume 24, No. 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
WilliamsL (2005) Mirrors without memories: Truth, history, and the new documentary. In: RosenthalACornerJ (eds) New Challenges for Documentary. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 59–75.
66.
WinstonB (2008) Claiming the Real II. Documentary: Grierson and Beyond, 2nd edn.London: Palgrave Macmillan – BFI Publishing.
67.
WolfG (ed.) (1972) Encyclopaedia Cinematographica. Göttingen: Institut für den Wissenschaftlichen film.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
