Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

More than a decade of research has demonstrated that individuals underperform in situations that remind them that they are stereotyped to do poorly. This paper explores the psychological processes that underlie these stereotype threat effects. Specifically, reminders of negative stereotypes cue uncertainty and a search for evidence that one might be confirming the stereotype. This process of monitoring for failure and suppressing negative thoughts and feelings hijacks the very cognitive mechanism—working memory—that is necessary for success on complex cognitive tasks where group differences in performance are a concern. Fortunately evidence suggests that when stigmatized individuals reappraise their experience, group differences in performance can be reduced if not eliminated.

Keywords

stereotype threat stigma academic performance working memory reappraisal

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aronson

Lustina

M.J.

Good

Keough

Steele

C.M.

Brown

(1999). When white men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 29–46.

Beilock

S.L.

Rydell

R.J.

McConnell

A.R.

(2007). Stereotype threat and working memory: Mechanisms, alleviation, and spill-over. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 256–276.

Engle

R.W.

(2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23.

Forbes

C.E.

Schmader

Allen

J.J.B.

(2008). Error monitoring in an intellectually threatening environment. Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 3, 253–261.

Johns

Inzlicht

Schmader

(2008). Stereotype threat and executive resource depletion: Examining the influence of emotion regulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 691–705.

Johns

Schmader

Martens

(2005). Knowing is half the battle: Teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women's math performance. Psychological Science, 16, 175–179.

Schmader

Forbes

C.E.

Zhang

Mendes

W.B.

(2009). A meta-cognitive perspective on cognitive deficits experienced in intellectually threatening environments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 584–596.

Schmader

Johns

(2003). Convergent evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440–452.

Schmader

Johns

Forbes

C.E.

(2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336–356.

10.

Schmader

Whitehead

Forbes

C.E.

(2009). Stereotype threat cues implicit uncertainty. Unpublished manuscript, University of Arizona.

11.

Steele

C.M.

(1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape the intellectual identities and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.

12.

Steele

C.M.

Aronson

(1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.

13.

Steele

C.M.

Spencer

S. J.

Aronson

(2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In Zanna

(Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379–440). New York: Academic Press.

14.

Turner

M.L.

Engle

R.W.

(1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.