Single-case-design researchers rarely used statistics in the past, but that is changing. In this article, I review the rapidly developing state of statistical analyses for single-case designs, including effect sizes, multilevel models, and Bayesian analyses. No analysis meets all the desiderata for an optimal single-case-design analysis, but this may be remedied in the near future. Single-case-design researchers will have incentives to use these analyses as they become more user-friendly and beneficial.
FranklinR. D.AllisonD. B.GormanB. S. (Eds.). (1997). Methods for the design and analysis of single-case research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. A book with a good introduction to the design of single-case research and to some analyses extant at the time of publication.
2.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J. (2012). (See References). An argument from a single-case-design researcher about why many statistics should not be applied to single-case-design data.
3.
ParkerR. IVannestK. J.DavisJ. L. (2011). (See References). A review of overlap statistics.
4.
ShadishW.R. (Ed.). (in press-a). (See References). A special issue of a journal demonstrating a wide array of recently developed ways to analyze or meta-analyze single-case designs, with commentaries.
5.
BloomB.FischerJ.OrmeJ. (2009). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
6.
BorckardtJ. J.NashM. R.MurphyM. D.MooreM.ShawD.O’NeilP. (2007). Clinical practice as natural laboratory for psychotherapy research. American Psychologist, 63, 77–94.
7.
ConeJ. D. (1986). Idiographic, nomothetic, and related perspectives in behavioral assessment. In NelsonR. O.HayesS. C. (Eds.), Conceptual foundations of behavioral assessment (pp. 111–128). New York, NY: Guilford.
8.
GablerN. B.DuanN.VohraS.KravitzR. L. (2011). N-of-1 trials in the medical literature: A systematic review. Medical Care, 49, 761–768.
9.
GorsuchR. (1983). Three methods for analyzing limited time series (N = 1) data. Behavioral Assessment, 5, 141–154.
10.
HedgesL. G.PustejovskyJ.ShadishW. R. (2012). A standardized mean difference effect size for single-case designs. Research Synthesis Methods, 3, 224–239.
11.
HedgesL. G.PustejovskyJ.ShadishW. R. (2013). A standardized mean difference effect size for multiple baseline designs across individuals. Research Synthesis Methods, 4, 324–341. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1086
12.
HoeppnerB. B.GoodwinM. S.VelicerW. F.MooneyM. E.HatsukamiD. K. (2008). Detecting longitudinal patterns of daily smoking following drastic cigarette reduction. Addictive Behaviors, 33, 623–639.
13.
HowickJ.ChalmersI.GlasziouP.GreenhalghT.HeneghanC.LiberatiA. . . . ThorntonH. (2011). The 2011 Oxford CEBM Evidence Levels of Evidence (Introductory Document). Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Retrieved from http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653
KratochwillT. R.LevinJ. R.HornerR. H.SwobodaC. M. (in press). Visual analysis of single-case intervention research: Conceptual and methodological considerations. In KratochwillT. R.LevinJ. R. (Eds.), Single-case intervention research: Methodological and data-analysis advances. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
KratochwillT. R.StoiberK. C. (2002). Evidence-based interventions in school psychology: Conceptual foundations of the Procedural and Coding Manual of Division 16 and the Society for the Study of School Psychology Task Force. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 341–389.
17.
LambertM. C.CartledgeG.HewardW. L.LoY. (2006). Effects of response cards on disruptive behavior and academic responding during math lessons by fourth-grade urban students. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 88–99.
MoeyaertM.FerronJ.BeretvasS. N.Van den NoortgateW. (in press). From a single-level analysis to a multilevel analysis of single-case experimental designs. Journal of School Psychology.
20.
MolenaarP. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2, 201–218.
21.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J. (2012). Bottom-up analyses for single-case research designs. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21, 254–265. doi:10.1007/s10864-012-9153-1
22.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L. (2011). Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine nonoverlap techniques. Behavior Modification, 35, 303–322. doi:10.1177/0145445511399147
23.
PeroneM. (1999). Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Experimental control is better. The Behavior Analyst, 22, 109–116.
24.
RindskopfD. M. (in press). Nonlinear Bayesian analysis for single case designs. Journal of School Psychology.
25.
ShadishW. R. (Ed.). (in press-a). Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs [Special Issue]. Journal of School Psychology.
26.
ShadishW. R. (Ed.). (in press-b). Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs: An introduction. Journal of School Psychology.
27.
ShadishW. R.HedgesL. V.PustejovskyJ. E. (in press). Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs with a standardized mean difference statistic: A primer and applications. Journal of School Psychology.
28.
ShadishW. R.HedgesL. V.PustejovskyJ. E.BoyajianJ. G.SullivanK. J.AndradeA.BarrientosJ. L. (2013). A d-statistic for single-case designs that is equivalent to the usual between-groups d-statistic. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.819021
29.
ShadishW. R.KyseE. N.RindskopfD. M. (2013). Analyzing data from single-case designs using multilevel models: New applications and some agenda items for future research. Psychological Methods, 18, 385–405. doi:10.1037/a0032964
30.
ShadishW. R.SullivanK. J. (2011). Characteristics of single-case designs used to assess intervention effects in 2008. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 971–980. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0111-y
31.
ShadishW. R.ZuurA. F.SullivanK. J. (2014). Using generalized additive (mixed) models to analyze single case designs. Journal of School Psychology, 52, 149–178.
32.
ShamseerL.SampsonM.BukutuC.BarrowmanN.AltmanD.MoherD.VohraS. (2012). P05.50. CONSORT extension for N-of-1 trials (CENT) guidelines. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 12(Suppl. 1), P410. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/12/S1/P410
33.
SidmanM. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York, NY: Basic Books.
34.
SkinnerB. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York, NY: Appleton-Century.
35.
SmithJ. D. (2011). Single-case experimental designs: A systematic review of published research and current standards. Psychological Methods, 17, 510–550.
36.
SwaminathanH.RogersH. J.HornerR. H. (in press). An effect size measure and Bayesian analysis of single-case designs. Journal of School Psychology.
37.
VelicerW. F. (1994). Time series models of individual substance abusers. NIDA Research Monographs, 142, 264–301.
38.
WoodwardP. (2011). Bayesian analysis made simple: An Excel GUI for WinBUGS. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
