Goal pursuit is almost always conducted in concert with helpful others. People serve as instrumental means to goals, and evaluations of people are shaped by their perceived instrumentality. Assistance from another person may elicit feelings of relationship satisfaction and commitment. Assisting others in their goal pursuit is also gratifying. We present a novel goal-systemic perspective on close relationships. Our analysis suggests that satisfying relationships are achieved when partners experience mutual perceived instrumentality—when each partner feels instrumental to his or her partner’s important goals and perceives the partner as instrumental to his or her important goals. Considering relationship partners as means to goals has important implications for relationship processes including attraction, relationship maintenance, and relationship dissolution.
FinkelE. J.HuiC. M.CarswellK. L.LarsonG. M. (2014). (See References). An article describing changing expectations in marriage over time.
2.
FitzsimonsG. M.FinkelE. J.vanDellenM. (2015). (See References). Presents a theory describing the way people pursue goals together and for one another.
3.
KruglanskiA. W.ShahJ. Y.FishbachA.FriedmanR.ChunW. Y.Sleeth-KepplerD. (2002). (See References). Presents a theory describing how people pursue their multiple goals.
4.
LakeyB.OrehekE. (2011). (See References). Presents a theory explaining social support and relationship processes.
5.
LightA. E.FitzsimonsG. M. (2014). (See References). An article commenting on the Finkel, Hui, Carswell, and Larson (2014) marriage article, with commentary on the consequences of having a marriage partner who serves more versus fewer goals.
6.
AronA.NormanC. C.AronE. N.McKennaC.HeymanR. E. (2000). Couples’ shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 273–284.
7.
BohnsV. K.LucasG. M.MoldenD. C.FinkelE. J.CoolsenM. K.KumashiroM.. . . HigginsE. T. (2013). Opposites fit: Regulatory focus complementarity and relationship well-being. Social Cognition, 31, 1–14.
8.
BolgerN.ZuckermanA.KesslerR. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953–961.
9.
CheungE. O.GardnerW. L.AndersonJ. F. (2015). Emotionships examining people’s emotion-regulation relationships and their consequences for well-being. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 6, 407–414.
10.
ConverseB. A.FishbachA. (2012). Instrumentality boosts: Appreciation helpers are more appreciated while they are useful. Psychological Science, 23, 560–566.
11.
CustersR.EitamB.BarghJ. A. (2012). Conscious and unconscious processes in goal pursuit. In AartsH.ElliotA. J. (Eds.), Goal-directed behavior (pp. 231–266). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
12.
FeeneyB. C.ThrushR. L. (2010). Relationship influences on exploration in adulthood: The characteristics and function of a secure base. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 57–76.
13.
FinkelE. J.EastwickP. E. (2015). Interpersonal attraction: In search of a theoretical Rosetta Stone. In SimpsonJ. A.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, volume 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 179–210). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14.
FinkelE. J.HuiC. M.CarswellK. L.LarsonG. M. (2014). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 1–41.
15.
FishbachA.ShahJ. Y.KruglanskiA. W. (2004). Emotional transfer in goal systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 723–738.
FitzsimonsG. M.FishbachA. (2010). Shifting closeness: Interpersonal effects of personal goal progress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 535–549.
18.
FitzsimonsG. M.ShahJ. Y. (2008). How goal instrumentality shapes relationship evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 319–337.
19.
HazanC.ShaverP. R. (2004). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. In ReisH. T.RusbultC. E. (Eds.), Close relationships: Key readings (pp. 153–174). Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
20.
KelleyH. H.ThibautJ. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
21.
KenrickD. T.NeubergS. L.ZierkK. L.KronesJ. M. (1994). Evolution and social cognition: Contrast effects as a function of sex, dominance, and physical attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 210–217.
22.
KöpetzC.FaberT.FishbachA.KruglanskiA. W. (2011). The multifinality constraints effect: How goal multiplicity narrows the means set to a focal end. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 810–826.
23.
KruglanskiA. W. (1996). Goals as knowledge structures. In GollwitzerP. M.BarghJ. A. (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 599–618). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
KruglanskiA. W.KopetzC.BelangerJ. J.ChunW. Y.OrehekE.FishbachA. (2013). Features of multifinality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 22–39.
25.
KruglanskiA. W.PierroA.ShevelandA. (2011). How many roads lead to Rome? Equifinality set-size and commitment to goals and means. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 344–352.
26.
KruglanskiA. W.ShahJ. Y.FishbachA.FriedmanR.ChunW. Y.Sleeth-KepplerD. (2002). A theory of goal systems. In ZannaM. P.OlsenJ. M. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 331–378).
27.
LakeyB.OrehekE. (2011). Relational regulation theory: A new approach to explain perceived social support’s link to mental health. Psychological Review, 118, 482–495.
28.
LightA. E.FitzsimonsG. M. (2014). Contextualizing marriage as a means and a goal. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 88–94.
29.
LinardatosL.LydonJ. E. (2011). Relationship-specific identification and spontaneous relationship maintenance processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 737–753.
30.
LydonJ. E.FitzsimonsG. M.NaidooL. (2003). Devaluation versus enhancement of attractive alternatives: A critical test using the calibration paradigm. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 349–359.
31.
MillerR. S. (1997). Inattentive and contented: Relationship commitment and attention to alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 758–766.
32.
MillsJ.ClarkM. S. (1982). Exchange and communal relationships. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 121–144.
33.
MurrayS. L.AloniM.HolmesJ. G.DerrickJ. L.StinsonD. A.LederS. (2009). Fostering partner dependence as trust-insurance: The implicit contingencies of the exchange script in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 324–348.
34.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G. (2011). Interdependent minds: The dynamics of close relationships. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
35.
MurrayS. L.LederS.MacGregorJ. C. D.HolmesJ. G.PinkusR. T.HarrisB. (2009). Becoming irreplaceable: How comparisons to the partner’s alternatives differentially affect low and high self-esteem people. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1180–1191.
36.
OrehekE.MauroR.KruglanskiA. W.van der BlesA. M. (2012). Prioritizing association strength versus value: Regulatory mode and means evaluation in single and multi-goal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 22–31.
37.
OrehekE.Vazeou-NieuwenhuisA. (2013). Sequential and concurrent strategies of multiple goal pursuit. Review of General Psychology, 17, 339–349.
38.
RusbultC. E.AgnewC.ArriagaX. (2012). The investment model of commitment processes. In Van LangeP.KruglanskiA.HigginsE. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 218–232). London, England: Sage.
39.
RusbultC. E.FinkelE. J.KumashiroM. (2009). The Michelangelo phenomenon. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 305–309.
40.
ShahJ. Y. (2003a). Automatic for the people: How representations of significant others implicitly affect goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 661–681.
41.
ShahJ. Y. (2003b). The motivational looking glass: How significant others implicitly affect goal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 424–439.
42.
ShahJ. Y.FriedmanR.KruglanskiA. W. (2002). Forgetting all else: On the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1261–1280.
43.
ShahJ. Y.KruglanskiA. W. (2002). Priming against your will: How accessible alternative affect goal pursuit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 368–383.
44.
ShahJ. Y.KruglanskiA. W. (2003). When opportunity knocks: Bottom-up priming of goals by means and its effects on self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1109–1122.
45.
SwannW. B.Jr. (2011). Self-verification theory. In Van LangeP.KruglanskiA.HigginsE. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 23–42). London, England: Sage.
46.
TidwellN. D.EastwickP. W.FinkelE. J. (2013). Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context: Evidence from the speed-dating paradigm. Personal Relationships, 20, 199–215.
47.
WilliamsonG. M.ClarkM. S.PegalisL. J.BehanA. (1996). Affective consequences of refusing to help in communal and exchange relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 34–47.
48.
ZhangY.FishbachA.KruglanskiA. W. (2007). The dilution model: How additional goals undermine the perceived instrumentality of a shared path. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 389–401.
