People who are socially integrated and have strong social ties live happier, longer lives. The link between social connection and well-being is commonly explained in terms of the benefits of receiving care and support from others. However, the benefits of giving care and support to others for the support provider are often overlooked. We review emerging findings that suggest when, why, and how giving support to others provides benefits to the self. We identify possible mechanisms by which these benefits arise and outline boundary conditions that influence such benefits. To gain a richer understanding of the association between social ties and well-being, an important future research direction is to not only consider the support receiver but also emphasize the support provider.
BrownS. L.BrownR. M. (2015). (See References). A comprehensive review of the neurobiological mechanisms associated with giving support and its effects on physical health.
2.
InagakiT. K.Byrne HaltomK. E.SuzukiS.JevticI.HornsteinE.BowerJ. E.EisenbergerN. I. (2016). (See References). A representative study that illustrates original neuroimaging research about giving support.
3.
LakeyB.OrehekE. (2011). Relational regulation theory: A new approach to explain the link between perceived social support and mental health. Psychological Review, 118, 482–495. A recent theory on social-support processes that emphasizes relational regulation of affect and cognition in everyday conversations and shared activities; especially relevant to the current article, it suggests that partners often initiate social interaction as a way of regulating their partner’s affect.
4.
PrestonS. D. (2013). (See References). A detailed review of the neural regions associated with parental care in animals and their relevance for extreme acts of altruism, a behavior related to support giving.
5.
UchinoB. N. (2009). Understanding the links between social support and physical health: A life-span perspective with emphasis on the separability of perceived and received support. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 236–255. A developmental perspective on the link between social support and health.
6.
AdelmanR. D.TmanovaL. L.DelgadoD.DionS.LachsM. S. (2014). Caregiver burden: A clinical review. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 311, 1052–1060.
7.
AgerboE.MortensenP. B.Munk-OlsenT. (2012). Childlessness, parental mortality and psychiatric illness: A natural experiment based on in vitro fertility treatment and adoption. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 67, 374–376.
8.
AkninL. B.Barrington-LeighC. P.DunnE. W.HelliwellJ. F.BurnsJ.Biswas-DienerR.NortonM. I. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 635–652.
9.
AkninL. B.HamlinJ. K.DunnE. W. (2012). Giving leads to happiness in young children. PLoS ONE, 7, e39211. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039211
10.
AllmanJ.RosinA.KumarR.HasenstaubA. (1998). Parenting and survival in anthropoid primates: Caretakers live longer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 6866–6869.
11.
AureliF.YatesK. (2010). Distress prevention by grooming others in crested black macaques. Biology Letters, 6, 27–29.
12.
BowlbyJ. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York, NY: Basic Books.
13.
BrownS. L.BrownR. M. (2015). Connecting prosocial behavior to improved physical health: Contributions from the neurobiology of parenting. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 55, 1–17.
14.
BrownS. L.NesseR. M.VinokurA. D.SmithD. M. (2003). Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: Results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychological Science, 14, 320–327.
15.
CarrD.SpringerK. W. (2010). Advances in families and health research in the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 743–761.
16.
DunnE. W.AkninL. B.NortonM. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319, 1687–1688.
17.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2001). Predictors of caregiving in adult intimate relationships: An attachment theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 972–994.
18.
FleischerS.SlotnickB. M. (1978). Disruption of maternal behavior in rats with lesions of the septal area. Physiology & Behavior, 21, 189–200.
19.
GruenewaldT. L.LiaoD. H.SeemanT. E. (2012). Contributing to others, contributing to oneself: Perceptions of generativity and health in later life. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 67, 660–665.
20.
HansenS. (1994). Maternal behavior of female rats with 6-OHDA lesions in the ventral striatum: Characterization of the pup retrieval deficit. Physiology & Behavior, 55, 615–620.
21.
Holt-LunstadJ.SmithT. B.LaytonJ. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 7, e1000316. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
22.
InagakiT. K.Byrne HaltomK. E.SuzukiS.JevticI.HornsteinE.BowerJ. E.EisenbergerN. I. (2016). The neurobiology of giving versus receiving support: The role of stress-related and social reward-related neural activity. Psychosomatic Medicine, 78, 443–453.
23.
InagakiT. K.EisenbergerN. I. (2012). Neural correlates of giving support to a loved one. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74, 3–7.
24.
InagakiT. K.EisenbergerN. I. (2016). Giving support to others reduces sympathetic nervous system-related responses to stress. Psychophysiology, 53, 427–435.
25.
LakeyB.OrehekE. (2011). Relational regulation theory: A new approach to explain the link between perceived social support and mental health. Psychological Review, 118, 482–495.
26.
LonsteinJ. S.SimmonsD. A.SwannJ. M.SternJ. M. (1997). Forebrain expression of c-fos due to active maternal behaviour in lactating rats. Neuroscience, 82, 267–281.
27.
MollJ.KruegerF.ZahnR.PardiniM.de Oliveira-SouzaR.GrafmanJ. (2006). Human fronto–mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 15623–15628.
28.
NelsonS. K.LayousK.ColeS. W.LyubomirskyS. (2016). Do unto others or treat yourself? The effects of prosocial and self-focused behavior on psychological flourishing. Emotion, 16, 850–861.
29.
OrehekE. (in press). Close relationships and goal pursuit: A people as means perspective. In KopetzC.FishbachA. (Eds.), The motivation-cognition interface: From the lab to the real world.
30.
OrehekE.ForestA. L. (2016). When people serve as means to goals: Implications of a motivational account of close relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 79–84.
31.
PiferiR. L.LawlerK. A. (2006). Social support and ambulatory blood pressure: An examination of both receiving and giving. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 328–336.
32.
PoulinM. J.BrownS. L.DillardA. J.SmithD. M. (2013). Giving to others and the association between stress and mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 1649–1655.
33.
PrestonS. D. (2013). The origins of altruism in offspring care. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1305–1341.
34.
ShuttK.MacLarnonA.HeistermannM.SempleS. (2007). Grooming in Barbary macaques: Better to give than to receive?Biology Letters, 3, 231–233.
35.
TaylorS. E.KleinL. C.LewisB. P.GruenewaldT. L.GurungR. A.UpdegraffJ. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107, 411–429.
36.
TelzerE. H.FuligniA. J.LiebermanM. D.GalvánA. (2014). Neural sensitivity to eudaimonic and hedonic rewards differentially predict adolescent depressive symptoms over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 6600–6605.
37.
WeinsteinN.RyanR. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 222–244.
38.
WhillansA. V.DunnE. W.SandstromG. M.DickersonS. S.MaddenK. M. (2016). Is spending money on others good for your heart?Health Psychology, 35, 574–583.
39.
WillsT. A. (1991). Social support and interpersonal relationships. In ClarkM. S. (Ed.), Prosocial behavior (pp. 265–289). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
