As a US-led coalition operation designed to obstruct weapons proliferation, the Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) is especially applicable to North Korea. Though practical measures have been developed to implement the interdiction of seaborne weapons shipments in particular, the PSI has yet to be rendered consistent with the international legal regime supporting free navigation of the high seas. Nor has it attracted specific United Nations support. A review of the 1962 ‘quarantine’ of Cuba demonstrates that in the absence of a more restrictive approach towards Pyongyang and conclusive evidence that North Korean weapons capability poses a current threat to the United States, the appellation ‘Cuba Lite’ is not inappropriate. Furthermore, in the context of multilateral diplomacy intended to persuade North Korea to relinquish its nuclear weapons programs in exchange for security guarantees, the PSI may be interpreted as pressuring Pyongyang and thus may not be perceived – even by PSI coalition partners – as consistent with that diplomacy.
Arms Control Association , 1994. ‘Aspin Outlines Pentagon’s New Counterproliferation Initiative’ , Arms Control Today24(1): 27-27 .
2.
Bedi, Rahul , 1999. ‘India Accounts for Cargo Seizure’ , Jane’s Defence Weekly32(3); available on subscription at http://www2.janes.com/ (accessed 7 September 2004).
3.
Boese, Wade , 2003. ‘Interdiction Initiative Participants Agree on End, Differ on Means’ , Arms Control Today33(9): 24–25 .
4.
Bolton, John , 2003. ‘A Dictatorship at the Crossroads’, remarks in Seoul, 31 July; available at http://www.state.gov/t/us/rm/23028.htm (accessed 22 December 2004).
5.
Brown, Edward D. , 1994. The International Law of the Sea. Aldershot: Dartmouth .
6.
Brownlie, Ian , 1963. International Law and the Use of Force by States. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
7.
Churchill, Robin R. & Alan V. Lowe , 1999. The Law of the Sea, 3rd edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press .
8.
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australia , 2003. ‘Statement of Interdiction Principles’; available at http://www.dfat.gov.au/globalissues/psi/psi_statement.html (accessed 12 February 2004).
9.
Ellis, Jason D. & Geoffrey D. Kiefer , 2004. Combating Proliferation: Strategic Intelligence and Security Policy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press .
10.
Foreign Ministry of China , 2003: ‘Foreign Ministry Spokesman’s Press Conference on 4 December 2003’; available at http://www.china-embassy.org/eng/fyrth/t55556.htm (accessed 7 September 2004).
11.
Gaddis, John Lewis , 1997. We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
12.
Gerardi, Greg J. & James A. Plotts , 1994. ‘An Annotated Chronology of DPRK Missile Trade and Developments’ , Nonproliferation Review2(1): 65–98 .
13.
Hayes, Peter , 2003. ‘Plutonium Pineapples: Avoiding Awful Choices Over North Korean Nuclear Exports’, Nautilus Policy Forum Online 03-04, 20 August; available at http://www.nautilus.org/fora/security/0340_Hayes.html (accessed 22 December 2004).
14.
Hersh, Seymour M. , 2004. Chain of Command: The Road from 9/11 to Abu Ghraib. New York: HarperCollins .
15.
International Maritime Organization , 2003. ‘Review of the SUA and its Protocol’; available at http://www.imo.org/Conventions/mainframe.asp?topic_id=259&doc_id=686 (accessed 30 August 2004).
16.
Japan Government , 2004. ‘The PSI Maritime Interdiction Exercise “Team Samurai2004”’; available at http://www.infojapan.org/policy/un/disarmament/arms/psi/overview0410.html (accessed 20 November 2004).
17.
Jesus, Jose Luis , 2003. ‘Protection of Foreign Ships Against Piracy and Terrorism at Sea: Legal Aspects’ , International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law18(3): 363–400 .
18.
Kajimoto, Daisuke , 2004. ‘Proliferation Security Initiative: A Case-Study of US–Japan Cooperation Within the Coalition of Willing’, presentation at Stimson Round-table, 19 October 2004; available at http://www.stimson.org/japan/pdf/Kajimotopresentation.pdf (accessed 21 December 2004).
19.
Kampani, Gaurav , 2002, ‘Second Tier Proliferation: The Case of Pakistan and North Korea’ , Nonproliferation Review9(3): 107–116 .
20.
Keefer, Edward C. ; Charles S. Sampson & Louis J. Smith , eds, 1996a. ‘Minutes of the 507th Meeting of the NSC, 22 October 1962’, Document 41 in Foreign Relations of the United States 1961–1963, Cuban Missile Crisis and Aftermath. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office .
21.
Keefer, Edward C. ; Charles S. Sampson & Louis J. Smith , eds, 1996b, ‘Record of Meeting 19 October 1962’, Document 31 in Foreign Relations of the United States 1961–1963, Cuban Missile Crisis and Aftermath. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office .
22.
Keefer, Edward C. ; Charles S. Sampson & Louis J. Smith , eds, 1996c. ‘Letter from Chairman Khrushchev to President Kennedy 24 Oct 1962’, Document 61 in Foreign Relations of the United States 1961–1963, Cuban Missile Crisis and Aftermath. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office .
23.
Koh, Byung Chul , 2004. ‘Six-Party Talks: Round 3’, Nautilus Institute Policy Forum Online PFO 04-26; available at http://www.nautilus.org/fora/security/0426AKoh.html (accessed 3 August 2004).
24.
Larson, Eric V. ; Norman D. Levin , Seonhae Baik & Bogdan Savych , 2004. Ambivalent Allies? A Study of South Korean Attitudes Toward the U.S. Santa Monica, CA: RAND ; available at http://www.rand.org/publications/TR/TR141/ (accessed 10 November 2004).
25.
Litwak, Robert S.2000. Rogue States and U.S. Foreign Policy: Containment After the Cold War. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins .
26.
McDonald, Dian1992. ‘U.S. Expresses Concern About North Korean Ship’, USIA , 8 March; available at http://www.fas.org/news/dprk/1992/26578232-26579936.htm (accessed 5 October 2004).
27.
Mahnken, Thomas G. , 1999. ‘A Critical Appraisal of the Defense Counterproliferation Initiative’ , National Security Studies Quarterly5(3): 91–102 .
28.
Mobley, Richard , 2002. ‘The Beira Patrol: Britain’s Broken Blockade Against Rhodesia’ , Naval War College Review55(1): 63–84 .
29.
O’Sullivan, Meghan L. , 2003. Shrewd Sanctions: Statecraft and State Sponsors of Terrorism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
30.
Porth, Jacquelyn , 1992. ‘US Ship Intercepts Focus on Cargos Destined for Iraq’, USIA , 10 March; available at http://www.fas.org/news/iran/1992/920310-218992.htm (accessed 5 October 2004).
31.
Reuland, Robert C. , 1989, ‘Interference with Non-National Ships on the High Seas: Peacetime Exceptions to the Exclusivity Rule of Flag-State Jurisdiction’ , Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law22: 1161–1229 .
32.
Richardson, Michael , 2004. A Time Bomb for Global Trade: Maritime-Related Terrorism in an Age of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Singapore: ISEAS .
33.
Roh, Moo-hyun , 2004. ‘Controversial Speech by Roh Moo Hyun’, speech delivered in Los Angeles, 14 November; available at http://www.nkzone.org/nkzone/entry/2004/11/controversial_s.php%23more (accessed 28 November 2004).
34.
Stebbins, Richard B. , ed, 1963a. ‘President Kennedy’s Broadcast Report to the People’, 22 October 1962, Document 82 in Documents on American Foreign Relations 1962. New York: Council on Foreign Relations (374–380).
35.
Stebbins, Richard B. , ed., 1963b. ‘Action by the American Governments: Resolution of the Council of the OAS’, 23 October 1962, Document 83 in Documents on American Foreign Relations 1962. New York: Council on Foreign Relations (380–383).
36.
Stebbins, Richard B. , ed., 1963c. ‘Interdiction of the Delivery of Offensive Weapons to Cuba: Presidential Proclamation 3504’, 23 October 1962, Document 84 in Documents on American Foreign Relations 1962. New York: Council on Foreign Relations (383–384).
37.
United Nations , 1988. ‘UN Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances’; available at http://www.incb.org/e/conv/1988/articles.htm (accessed 18 August 2004).
38.
United Nations , 2004. ‘Security Council Decides All States Shall Act To Prevent Proliferation of Mass Destruction Weapons’, Press Release SC/8076, 28 April.
39.
United States , 2002. ‘National Strategy To Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction’; available at http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/16092.pdf.
40.
Walsh, Kathleen , 2003. ‘Countering North Korean Proliferation: The PSI Needs More Time’ , Stimson Centre Quarterly Update on East Asian Security2(3); available at http://www.stimson.org/squeas/?SN=SQ20030826586 (accessed 4 August 2004).
41.
White, Mark J.1996. The Cuban Missile Crisis. London: Macmillan .
42.
Wit, Joel S.2004. ‘The U.S.–ROK Alliance: Something’s Got To Give?’, IFES Forum on Peace and Development in East Asia, Kyungnam University , 19 May; available at http://ifes.kyungnam.ac.kr/ifes/ifes/eng/activity/05_ifes_forum_view.asp?ifesforumNO=112&page=3 (accessed 13 December 2004).
