Reliance on moral principles and professional codes has given nurses direction for ethical decision-making. However, rational models do not capture the emotion and reality of human choice. Intuitive response must be considered.
Research purpose:
Supporting intuition as an important ethical decision-making tool for nurses, the aim of this study was to determine relationships between intuition, years of worked nursing experience, and perceived ethical decision-making ability. A secondary aim explored the relationships between rational thought to years of worked nursing experience and perceived ethical decision-making ability.
Research design and context:
A non-experimental, correlational research design was used. The Rational Experiential Inventory measured intuition and rational thought. The Clinical Decision Making in Nursing Scale measured perceived ethical decision-making ability. Pearson’s r was the statistical method used to analyze three primary and two secondary research questions.
Participants:
A sample of 182 emergency nurses was recruited electronically through the Emergency Nurses Association. Participants were self-selected.
Ethical considerations:
Approval to conduct this study was obtained by the Adelphi University Institutional Review Board.
Findings:
A relationship between intuition and perceived ethical decision-making ability (r = .252, p = .001) was a significant finding in this study.
Discussion:
This study is one of the first of this nature to make a connection between intuition and nurses’ ethical decision-making ability.
Conclusion:
This investigation contributes to a broader understanding of the different thought processes used by emergency nurses to make ethical decisions.
BennerP. Enhancing patient advocacy and social ethics. Am J Crit Care2003; 12(4): 374–375.
2.
BeauchampTLChildressJF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 99–280.
3.
American Nurses Association (ANA). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. Silver Spring, MD: ANA, 2015, pp. 7–30.
4.
SmithTSMcGuireJMAbbottDW. Clinical ethical decision making: an investigation of the rationales used to justify doing less than one believes one should. Prof Psychol Res Pr1991; 22: 235–239.
5.
KahnemanD. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping moral rationality. Am Psychol2003; 58: 697–720.
6.
KahnemanDKleinG. Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree. Am Psychol2009; 64(6): 515–526.
7.
HassaniPAbdiAJalaliR. State of the science, “intuition in nursing practice”: a systemic review study. J Clin Diagn Res2016; 10(2): 7–11.
8.
HutchinsonMHigsonMClearyM. Nursing expertise: a course of ambiguity and evolution in a concept. Nurs Inq2016; 23(4): 290–304.
9.
ChilcoteR. Intuition: a concept analysis. Nurs Forum2017; 52(1): 62–67.
10.
SewallMF. Artistic nursing. Am J Nurs1906; 7(2): 118–122.
11.
RewLBarrowEM. Intuition: a neglected hallmark of nursing knowledge. Adv Nurs Sci1987; 10(1): 49–62.
12.
McCainRF. Nursing by assessment: not intuition. Am J Nurs1965; 65(4): 82–84.
13.
PylesSHSternPN. Discovery of nursing gestalt in critical care nursing: the importance of the gray gorilla syndrome. Image J Nurs Sch1983; 15(1): 51–57.
14.
RewL. Intuition: concept analysis of a group phenomenon. Adv Nurs Sci1986; 8(2): 21–28.
15.
BennerPTannerC. Clinical judgment: how expert nurses use intuition. Am J Nurs1987; 87(1): 23–31.
16.
BennerP. The Dreyfus model of skill acquisition applied to nursing. In: ConnerMAnselmentN (eds) From novice to expert: excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984, pp. 13–38.
17.
CorkLL. Nursing intuition as an assessment tool in predicting severity of injury in trauma patients. J Trauma Nurs2014; 21(5): 244–252.
18.
McCutcheonHPincombeJ. Intuition: an important tool in nursing practice. J Adv Nurs2001; 35(3): 342–348.
19.
SmithA. Exploring the legitimacy of intuition as a form of nursing knowledge. Nurs Stand2009; 23(40): 35–40.
20.
RewL. Intuition: nursing knowledge and the spiritual dimension of persons. Holist Nurs Pract1989; 3(3): 56–68.
21.
MitchellGJ. Intuitive knowing: exposing a myth in theory development. Nurs Sci Q1994; 7(2): 2–3.
22.
KleinG. The power of intuition. New York: Doubleday, 2003; pp. 4–35.
23.
SimonHA. What is an “explanation” of behavior?Clin Psychol Sci1992; 3(3): 150–161.
24.
PolanyiM. The tacit dimension. Chicago, IL: The University Chicago Press, 1966, p. 4.
CarperBA. Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. In: ReedPGCrawford ShearerNB (eds) Perspectives on nursing theory. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1978, pp. 377–384.
27.
Ruth-SahdLATisdellEJ. The meaning and the use of intuition in novice nurses: a phenomenological study. Adult Educ Q2007; 57(2): 115–140.
28.
AganDR. Intuitive knowing as a dimension of nursing. Adv Nurs Sci1987; 10(1): 63–70.
29.
YoungCE. Intuition and the nursing process. Holist Nurs Pract1987; 1(3): 52–62.
30.
PearsonH. Science and intuition: do both have a place in decision making?Br J Nurs2013; 22(4): 212–215.
31.
EasenPWilcocksonJ. Intuition and rational decision-making in professional thinking: a false dichotomy?J Adv Nurs1996; 24: 667–673.
32.
EpsteinS. Cognitive-experiential self-theory: an integrative theory of personality. In: CurtisR (ed.) The relational self: convergences in psychoanalysis and social psychology. New York: Guilford Press, 1991, pp. 111–137.
33.
KahnemanD. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, pp. 4–5.
34.
DaneEPrattMGBaerM. Rational versus intuitive problem solving: how thinking “off the beaten path” can stimulate creativity. Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts2011; 5(1): 3–12.
35.
GreenC. Nursing intuition: a valid form of knowledge. Nurs Philos2012; 13: 98–111.
36.
PretzJEFolseVN. Nursing experience and preference for intuition in decision making. J Clin Nurs2011; 20: 2878–2889.
37.
EnglishI. Intuition as a function of the expert nurse: a critique of Benner’s novice to expert model. J Adv Nurs1993; 18: 387–393.
38.
PaciniREpsteinS. The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and ratio-bias phenomenon. J Pers Soc Psychol1999; 76(6): 972–987.
39.
MinerMPetoczA. Moral theory in ethical decision making: problems, clarifications, and recommendations from a psychological perspective. J Bus Ethics2003; 42: 11–25.
40.
FryS. Towards a theory of nursing ethics. Adv Nurs Sci1989; 11(4): 9–22.
41.
RogersonMDGottliebMCHandelsmanMM. Nonrational processes in ethical decision making. Am Psychol2011; 66(7): 614–623.
42.
BennerPTannerCCheslaC. Expertise in nursing practice: caring, clinical judgment, and ethics. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 2009, p. 18.
43.
KitchenerKS. Intuition, critical evaluation, and ethical principles: the foundation for ethical decisions in counseling psychology. Couns Psychol1984; 12: 43–55.
44.
HaidtJ. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol Rev2001; 108(4): 814–834.
45.
JenkinsHM. A research tool for measuring perceptions of clinical decision making. J Prof Nurs1985; 1: 221–229.
46.
JamesDCSimpsonKRKnoxGE. How do expert labor nurses view their role. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs2003; 32(6): 814–823.
47.
KingLMacLeodCJ. Intuition and the development of expertise in surgical ward and intensive care nurses. J Adv Nurs2003; 37(4): 322–329.
48.
SumnerJ. Reflection and moral maturity in a nurse’s caring practice: a critical perspective. Nurs Philos2010; 11: 159–169.
49.
KohlbergL. Essays on moral development, vol. II: the philosophy of moral development. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row, 1984.
50.
LauriSSalanteraSChalmersK. An exploratory study of clinical decision-making in five countries. J Nurs Scholarsh2001; 33(1): 83–90.
51.
SchefferBKRubenfeldMG. A consensus statement on critical thinking in nursing. J Nurs Educ2000; 39(8): 352–359.
52.
TabakNBar-TalYCohen-MansfieldJ. Clinical decision making of experienced and novice nurses. West J Nurs Res1996; 18: 534–547.
53.
BennerPWrubelJ. Skilled clinical knowledge: the value of perceptual awareness. J Nurs Adm1982; 12(5): 11–14.
54.
WhyteJWardPEcclesDW. The relationship between knowledge and clinical performance in novice and experienced critical care nurses. Heart Lung2008; 38(6): 517–525.
55.
BrooksEMThomasS. The perception and judgment of senior baccalaureate student nurses in clinical decision making. ANS Adv Nurs Sci1997; 19(3): 50–69.
56.
Ruth-SahdLA. A modification of Benner’s hierarchy of clinical practice: the development of clinical intuition in the novice trauma nurse. Holist Nurs Pract1993; 7(3): 8–14.
57.
GilliganC. In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
58.
GreeneJ. From neural “is” to moral “ought”: what are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology. Nat Rev Neurosci2003; 4: 847–850.
59.
GreeneJHaidtJ. How (and where) does moral judgment work?Trends Cogn Sci2002; 6(12): 517–523.
60.
GreeneJNystomLEEngelAD. The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron2004; 44: 389–400.
61.
WoodsM. A nursing ethic: the moral voice of experienced nurses. Nurs Ethics1999; 6(5): 423–433.
62.
LippA. An enquiry into a combined approach for nursing ethics. Nurs Ethics1998; 5(2): 122–138.
Dierckx de CasterleBGrypdonckMJanssenPJ. The relationship between education and ethical behavior of nursing students. West J Nurs Res1996; 18(3): 330–342.
