For 30 years, the opening of internal borders in the European Union has engendered many cross-border exchanges in borderlands. European cross-border regions created within this context are thus framed and characterized by the simultaneous dynamics of bordering and cross-border integration. This paper examines these two processes and the analysis is based on the representations of stakeholders from the Eurometropolis of Lille–Kortrijk–Tournai. It highlights two main results. First, the representations of stakeholders shed light on bordering dynamics that can be combined even though they can also appear to be contradictory. In particular, the paper unveils the dimension of ‘a-bordering’, which refers to a certain status quo of and about the border. Second, the representations of stakeholders show ambivalent and concomitant visions of a ‘cross-border integration with the border’ and a ‘cross-border integration without the border’. These representations challenge the implementation of cross-border policies and schemes.
Amilhat-SzaryA-L (2013) Mobile mountains?Journal of Alpine Research/Revue de Géographie Alpine101(2): 2–5.
2.
Amilhat-SzaryA-LGirautF (2015) Borderities and the Politics of Contemporary Mobile Borders. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
AndersonAWeverE (2003) Borders, border regions and economic integration: one world, ready or not. Journal of Borderlands Studies18(1): 27–38.
4.
BalibarE (2002) Politics and the Other Scene. London: Verso.
5.
BarelY (1979) Le paradoxe et le système – essai sur le fantastique social. Grenoble: Presse universitaire de Grenoble.
6.
BlatterJ (2003) Beyond hierarchies and networks: institutional logics and change in transboundary spaces. Governance16(4): 503–526.
7.
BrackNStartinN (2015) Introduction: Euroscepticism, from the margins to the mainstream. International Political Science Review (Special Issue) 36(3): 239–249.
8.
BrambillaC (2015) Exploring the critical potential of the borderscape concept. Geopolitics20(1): 14–34.
9.
BufonM (2014) Spatial and social (re)integration of border and multicultural regions: creating unity in diversity? In: BufonMMinghiJPaasiA (eds) The New European Frontiers: Social and Spatial (Re)integration Issues in Multicultural and Border Regions. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 2–23.
10.
ChillaTEvrardESchultzC (2012) On the territoriality of cross-border cooperation: “Institutional Mapping” in a multi-level context. European Planning Studies20(6): 961–980.
11.
De BoePGraslandCHealyA (1999) Spatial integration. Study Programme on European Spatial Planning, Final report 1.4.
12.
DecovilleADurandF (2017) Challenges and obstacles in the production of cross-border territorial strategies – the example of the Greater Region, Transactions of the AESOP. DOI: 10.24306/TrAESOP.2017.01.005
13.
DecovilleADurandF (2016) Building a cross-border territorial strategy between four countries: wishful thinking?European Planning Studies24(10): 1825–1843.
14.
DecovilleADurandFSohnCWaltherO (2013) Comparing cross-border metropolitan integration in Europe: towards a functional typology. Journal of Borderlands Studies28(2): 221–237.
15.
DurandF (2015) Theoretical framework of the cross-border space production – the case of the Eurometropolis Lille-Kortrijk–Tournai. Journal of Borderlands Studies30(3): 309–328.
16.
DurandFLamourC (2014) Cross-border metropolitan governance: the multi-faceted state power – the case of Lille–Kortrijk–Tournai. Space and Polity18(3): 197–214.
17.
European Commission (EC) (2015) Flash Eurobarometer 422. Cross Border Cooperation. Survey requested by Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG REGIO) and co-ordinated by Directorate-General for Communication.
18.
FaludiA (2013) Territorial cohesion, territorialism, territoriality, and soft planning: a critical review. Environment and Planning A45(6): 1302–1317.
19.
GänzleSKernK (eds) (2016) A ‘Macro-Regional’ Europe in the Making: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Evidence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
GreenS (2012) A sense of border. In: WilsonTMDonnanH (eds) A Companion to Border Studies. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 573–592.
21.
HamezGAmilhat-SzaryA-LParisDReitelBWaltherO (2013) Modelling and benchmarking of borders. Belgéo (Special Issue) 2013(1).
22.
HarrisonJGroweA (2014) When regions collide: in what sense a new ‘regional problem’?Environment and Planning A46(10): 2332–2352.
23.
HerzogLSohnC (2014) The cross-border metropolis in a global age: a conceptual model and empirical evidence from the US–Mexico and European Border Regions. Global Society28(4): 441–461.
24.
INSEE (2006) Toujours plus de travailleurs frontaliers vers la Belgique, Pages de Profils n° 10.
25.
KnippschildR (2011) Cross-border spatial planning: understanding, designing and managing cooperation processes in the German-Polish-Czech Borderland. European Planning Studies19(4): 629–645.
KolossovVScottJ (2013) Selected conceptual issues in border studies. Belgéo2013(1): 2–16.
28.
KrätkeS (1998) Problems of cross-border regional integration: the case of the German-Polish border region. European Urban and Regional Studies5(3): 249–262.
29.
LefebvreM (2013) La construction de l’Europe et l’avenir des nations. Paris: Armand Colin.
30.
LentackerF (1973) La frontière franco-belge. Étude géographique des effets d’une frontière internationale sur la vie de relations. Lille: Service de reproduction des thèses, Université de Lille III.
31.
Lille Métrople (LMCU) (2010) Les flux d’échanges de personnes entre Métropole européenne de Lille et l’extérieur. Lille: Métropole européenne de Lille – Service études de déplacements.
32.
LundquistK-JTripplM (2013) Distance, proximity and types of cross-border innovation systems: a conceptual analysis. Regional Studies47(3): 450–460.
33.
MartinezO (1994) The dynamics of border interaction. In: SchofieldCH (ed.) Global Boundaries: World Boundaries. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 8–14.
34.
MatthiessenC (2004) The Öresund Area: pre- and post-bridge cross-border functional integration: the bi-national regional question. GeoJournal61: 31–39.
35.
MenasseR (2015) Un messager pour l’Europe. Plaidoyer contre les nationalismes. Paris: Buchet/Chastel.
36.
NellesJDurandF (2014) Political rescaling and metropolitan governance in cross-border regions: comparing the cross-border metropolitan areas of Lille and Luxembourg. European Urban and Regional Studies21(1): 104–122.
37.
NewmanD (2006) The lines that continue to separate us: borders in our ‘borderless’ world. Progress in Human Geography30(2): 143–161
38.
PaasiA (2001) Europe as a social process and discourse: considerations of place, boundaries and identity. European Urban and Regional Studies8(1): 7–28.
39.
PaasiA (2009) The resurgence of the ‘region’ and ‘regional identity’: theoretical perspectives and empirical observations on regional dynamics in Europe. Review of International Studies35: 121–146.
40.
PaasiAZimmerbauerK (2016) Penumbral borders and planning paradoxes: relational thinking and the question of borders in spatial planning. Environment and Planning A48(1): 75–93.
41.
PerkmannM (2003) Cross-border regions in Europe: significance and drivers of regional cross-border co-operation. European Urban and Regional Studies10(2): 153–171.
42.
PerkmannM (2007) Policy entrepreneurship and multilevel governance: a comparative study of European cross-border regions. Environment and Planning C25: 861–879.
PerrinT (2012) Prégnance et renouvellement du référentiel identitaire dans l’action culturelle eurorégionale. In: SaezGSaezJ-P (eds), Les nouveaux enjeux des politiques culturelles. Dynamiques européennes. Paris: Éditions La Découverte, pp. 223–237.
45.
PerrinT (2015) Creative regions on a European Cross-Border Scale: policy Issues and Development Perspectives. European Planning Studies23(12): 2423–2437.
46.
PerrinT (2016) D’Euralille à la métropole européenne de Lille: l’Europe, axe majeur du développement métropolitain? In: LebrasDSeigneuretNTalandierM (eds) Métropoles en chantiers. Boulogne-Billancourt: Berger-Levrault, pp. 63–78.
47.
ProkkolaE-KZimmerbauerKJakolaF (2015) Performance of regional identity in the implementation of European cross-border initiatives. European Urban and Regional Studies22(1): 104–117.
48.
RumfordC (2006) Theorizing borders. European Journal of Social Theory9(2): 155–169.
49.
ScottJ-W (2009) Bordering and ordering the European neighbourhood: a critical perspective on EU territoriality and geopolitics. Trames13(3): 232–247.
50.
ScottJ-W (2011) Reflections on EU Geopolitics: consolidation, neighbourhood and civil society in the reordering of European space. Geopolitics16(1): 146–175.
51.
SohnC (2014) Modelling cross-border integration: the role of borders as a resource. Geopolitics19(3): 587–608.
52.
SohnCReitelB (2016) The role of national states in the construction of cross-border metropolitan regions in Europe: a scalar approach. European Urban and Regional Studies23(3): 306–321.
53.
SvenssonSNordlundC (2015) The building blocks of a Euroregion: novel metrics to measure cross-border integration. Journal of European Integration37(3): 371–389.
54.
TripplM (2010) Developing cross-border regional innovation systems: key factors and challenges. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie101(2): 150–160.
55.
van HoutumHvan NaerssenT (2002) Bordering, ordering and othering. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie93(2): 125–136.
56.
WesselinkEBoschmaR (2016) European neighbourhood policy: history, structure, and implemented policy measures. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie. Epub ahead of print 15 July. DOI: 10.1111/tesg.12207.
